This article examines how Norwegian children with physical disabilities experience friendship during the transition between primary and secondary school. The research was based on 38 life mode interviews with 15 children. Two themes were explored: (1) different kinds of friends: friends with disabilities, friends without disabilities and technology-mediated friendships; and (2) qualities of friendship: understanding, intimacy and trust, mutuality and friendships with children both with and without disabilities. The conclusion is that children with physical disabilities adapt to different, but mutual friendships.
AndenæsA (1991) Fra undersøkelsesobjekt til medforsker? Livsformsintervju med 4-5 åringer. Nordisk psykologi43(4): 274–292.
2.
Aristotle (1999) Aristoteles Etikk, trans. StigenA. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
3.
AsbjørnslettMHemmingssonH (2008) Participation at school as experienced by teenagers with physical disabilities. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy15(3): 153–162.
4.
BondE (2010) Managing mobile relationships: Children’s perceptions of the impact of the mobile phone on relationships in their everyday lives. Childhood17(4): 514–529.
5.
BostadI (2010) Annerledeshet og frihet- den representative frihetens sårbarhet. In: KristevaJEngebretsenE (eds) Annerledeshet. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS, 213–233.
6.
BukowskiWMHozaBBoivinM (1994) Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scale. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships11(3): 471–484.
7.
CocksAJ (2005) The peer groups of children with learning impairments. In: GoodleyDVan HoveG (eds) Another Disability Studies Reader? People with Learning Disabilities and a Disabling World. Antwerp: Garant, 73–92.
8.
CorsaroWA (1992) Interpretive reproduction in children’s peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly55(2): 160–177.
9.
De SchauwerEVan HoveGMortierG (2009) I need help on Mondays, it’s not my day. The other days, I’m OK: Perspectives of disabled children on inclusive education. Children and Society23(2): 99–111.
10.
DoubtLMcCollMA (2003) A secondary guy: Physically disabled teenagers in secondary schools. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy70(3): 139–150.
11.
EstellDBJonesMHPearlRAckerRV (2009) Best friendships of students with and without learning disabilities across late elementary school. Exceptional Children76(1): 110–124.
12.
FurmanWBuhrmesterD (1985) Children’s perceptions on the personal relationships in their social networksDevelopmental Psychology21(6): 1016–1023.
13.
GadamerH-G (2004 [1989]) Truth and Method, new edn.London and New York: Continuum.
14.
GrovenSEngelsrudG (2010) Dilemmas in the process of weight reduction: Exploring how women experience training as a means of losing weight. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being5(2): 1–13.
15.
GrueJ (2001) Motstand og mestring. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag.
16.
GulbrandsenLM (2003) Peer relations as arenas for gender constructions among young teenagers. Pedagogy, Culture and Society11(1): 113–131.
17.
GulbrandsenLM (2010) Annerledeshet og barns deltakelse - deling og mening. In: EngebretsenESolvangPK (eds) Annerledeshet - sårbarhetens språk og politikk. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 179–192.
18.
HallbergUStavropoulosDMohlinBHagbergC (2011) Living with Crouzon syndrome: Transition from childhood to adulthood. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research article 1: 1–13.
19.
HanKGChadseyJG (2004) The influence of gender patterns and grade level on friendship expectations of middle school students toward peers with severe disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities19(4): 205–214.
20.
HartrupWW (1995) The three faces of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships12(4): 569–574.
21.
HeideggerM (1962) Being and Time. New York: Harper and Row.
22.
HelsethSMisværN (2010) Adolescents’ perceptions of quality of life: What it is and what matters. Journal of Clinical Nursing19(9–10): 1454–1461.
23.
HelsethSSlettebøÅ (2004) Research involving children: Some ethical issues. Nursing Ethics11(3): 290–308.
KalymonKGettingerMHanley-MaxwellC (2010) Middle school boys’ perspectives on social relationships with peers with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education31(4): 305–316.
26.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) Interviews. Los Angeles, London and New Delhi: Sage.
27.
KvelloØ (2006) Barns og unges vennskap. Trondheim: Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse, Pedagogisk Institutt.
28.
MishnaFCookCSainiMWuM-JMacFaddenR (2009) Interventions for children, youth, and parents to prevent and reduce cyber abuse. Campbell Systematic Reviews2–54.
29.
MulcaheyMJ (1992) Returning to school after a spinal cord injury: Perspectives from four adolescents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy46(4): 305–312.
30.
MulderijKJ (1997) Peer relations and friendship in physically disabled children. Child: Care, Health and Development23(5): 379–389.
31.
NotaLFerrariLSoresiS (2005) Elementary school children’s willingness to help and be friends with their disabled peers. International Journal of Disability and Human Development4(2): 131–137.
32.
PeterJValkenburgPMSchoutenMA (2005) Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. CyberPsychology and Behaviour8(5): 423–430.
33.
PollockNStewartD (1990) A survey of activity patterns and vocational readiness of young adults with physical disabilities. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation4(1): 17–26.
34.
SeymourWLuptonD (2004) Holding the line online: Exploring wired relationships for people with disabilities. Disability and Society19(4): 291–305.
35.
ShakespeareT (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs. London and New York: Routledge.
36.
StandahlOF (2009) Relations of Meaning: A Phenomenology Oriented Case Study of Learning Bodies in a Rehabilitation Context. Oslo: The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences.
37.
StevensSESteeleCAJutaiJWKalninsiIVBorolussiJABiggarWD (1996) Adolescents with physical disabilities: Some psychosocial aspects of health. Journal of Adolescent Health19(2): 157–164.
38.
SvenaeusF (2000) The Hermeneutics of Medicine and the Phenomenology of Health: Steps towards a Philosophy of Medical Practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
39.
TøssebroJEnganEYtterhusB (2006) Har vi en inkluderende skole? In: TøssebroJYtterhusB (eds) Funksjonshemmete barn i skole og barnehage. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS, 75–98.
40.
ValkenburgPMPeterJ (2009) The effect of instant messaging on the quality of adolescents’ existing friendships: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication59(1): 79–97.
41.
WatsonNShakespeareTCunningham-BurleySBarnesC (1999) Life as a Disabled Child: A Qualitative Study of Young People’s Experiences and Perspectives. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh.
42.
WeiserbsBGottliebJ (1995) The perception of risk over time as a factor influencing attitudes toward children with physical disabilities. The Journal of Psychology129(6): 689–699.
43.
WendelborgC (2010) Å vokse opp med funksjonshemming i skole og blant jevnaldrende. Trondheim: Norges teknisk - naturvitenskapelige universitet, Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse. Institutt for sosialt arbeid og helsevitenskap.
44.
WendelborgCKvelloØ (2010) Perceived social acceptance and peer intimacy among children with disabilities in regular schools in Norway. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities23(2): 143–153.
