Childhood research has long shared a bio-political terrain with state agencies in which children figure primarily as ‘human futures’. In the 20th century bio-social dualism helped to make that terrain navigable by researchers, but, as life processes increasingly become key sites of bio-political action, bio-social dualism is becoming less useful as a navigational aid. The contribution that a view of childhood as a ‘hybrid’ phenomenon might make to developing new navigational aids is considered. A Foucaultian reading of the history of childhood bio-politics yields three ‘multiplicities’ of childhood. The assistance these can offer in navigating the contemporary biopolitics of childhood is described.
Alderson P. ( 2000) Young Children’s Rights: Exploring Beliefs, Principles and Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley .
2.
Blakemore S. and Frith U. ( 2005) The Learning Brain: Lessons for Education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
3.
Burman E. ( 1994) Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. London: Routledge.
4.
Deleuze G. and Guattari F. ( 1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia . London: Athlone.
5.
Foucault M. ( 2007) Security, Territory, Population. New York: Picador.
6.
Foucault M. ( 2008) The Birth of Biopolitics. New York : Picador.
7.
Giddens A. ( 2009) The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge : Polity.
8.
Hart R. ( 2007) Children’s Participation in Sustainable Development . London: Earthscan.
9.
James A and Prout A (eds) (1997) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood, 2nd edn. London: Falmer.
10.
Latour B. ( 1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Lee NM ( 2001) Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty . Maidenhead: Open University Press .
12.
Motzkau JF ( 2010) Speaking up against justice: Credibility, suggestibility and children’s memory on trial. In: Haaken J and Reavey P (eds) Memory Matters: Contexts for Understanding Sexual Abuse Recollections . London: Routledge.
13.
Office of Science and Technology. (2005) Drugs Futures 2025. London: TSO .
14.
Oswell D.(2009) Infancy and experience: Voice, politics and bare life. European Journal of Social Theory12(1): 135-154.
15.
Parsons T. ( 1956) The American family: Its relation to personality and the social structure. In: Parsons T and Bales RF (eds) Family, Socialisation and Interaction Process. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Piaget J. ( 1927) The Child’s Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
17.
Prout A. ( 2005) The Future of Childhood. London : Routledge.
18.
Rose N. ( 2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Bio-medicine, Power and Subjectivity in the 21st Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Sen A. and Nussbaum M. ( 2001) Development as Freedom. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
20.
Serres M. ( 1995) The Natural Contract. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press.
21.
Smith R. ( 2010) A Universal Child?London: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
Stainton Rogers R. and Stainton Rogers W. ( 1992) Stories of Childhood: Shifting Agendas of Child Concern . New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
23.
Thorne B. ( 2007) Editorial: Crafting the interdisciplinary field of childhood studies. Childhood14(2): 147-152.
24.
Thrower NJW ( 2008) Maps and Civilization: Cartography in Culture and Society . Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
25.
Wright J. and Harwood V. ( 2008) Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies. London: Taylor and Francis .
