Data on 12 local chapters of a high status women’s community service organization and their communities are used to assess the relative impact of community needs, members’ perceptions and preferences, and interorganizational ties on decisions about how to allocate volunteers and funds among 17 community problem areas. Quantitative analysis indicates that the distribution of volunteer time and funds was unrelated to community needs as measured by objective indicators. Instead, members’ and leaders’ perceptions of the severity of community problems and their willingness to work in some problem areas more than others were the most important determinants of resource allocation. Qualitative evidence also suggests that members’ ties to other organizations played a role in the chapters’ decisions about project selection.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apple, R. W., Jr.Voluntarism campaign: Political spotlight shines on volunteerism conference (1997, April 25). The New York Times, pp. A16-A16, A25-A25.
2.
Bonjean, C. M.
, Markham, W. T., & Macken, P. O. (1994). Measuring self-expression in volunteer organizations: A theory-based questionnaire. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30, 487-515.
3.
Camasso, M. J.
, & Moore, D. E. (1985). Rurality and residualist social welfare response. Rural Sociology, 50, 397-408.
4.
Carpinello, S. E.
, Newman, D. L., & Jatulis, L. L. (1992). Health decision makers’ perceptions of program evaluation: Relationship to purpose and information needs. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 15, 405-419.
5.
Covelli, L.
(1985). Dominant class culture and legitimation: Female volunteer directors. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14, 24-35.
6.
Covington, S.
(1994, October). Community foundations and the disenfranchised: At the margins of change. Paper presented at the annual meetings of ARNOVA, Berkeley, CA.
7.
Daniels, A. K.
(1988). Invisible careers: Women civic leaders from the volunteer world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Domhoff, G. W.
(1998). Who rules America? Power and politics in the year 2000. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
9.
Etzioni, A.
(1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
10.
Galaskiewicz, J.
(1979). The structure of community organizational networks. Social Forces, 57, 1346-1364.
11.
Gergen, D.Renewing the call to service (1996, May 20). U.S. News & World Report, p. 76-76.
12.
Gittell, M.
, Gross, J., & Newman, K. (1994). Race and gender in neighborhood development organizations. New York: Howard Samuels State Management and Policy Center, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York.
13.
Gronbjerg, K.
, Harmon, L., Olkkonen, A., & Raza, A. (1995). The United Way system at the crossroads: Community planning and allocation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 428-452.
14.
Hall, R. H.
(1996). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Harden, B.Summit on volunteerism ends with calls to keep promise to help children (1997, April 30). The Washington Post, p. A7-A7.
16.
Hodgkinson, V. A.
, & Weitzman, M. S. (1996). Giving and volunteering in the United States. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
17.
Hodgkinson, V. A.
, Weitzman, M. S., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1993). A portrait of the Independent Sector: The activities and finances of charitable organization. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
18.
Jencks, C.
(1987). Who gives to what? In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 321-339). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Johnson, M. A. (1994). Change in a voluntary association, 1975-1992: A consideration of social change, organizational structure, gender, and class. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
20.
Levine, S.
, & White, P. E. (1961). Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583-610.
21.
Loos, G.
(1995). A blended qualitative-quantitative assessment model for identifying and rank-ordering service needs of indigenous peoples. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 237-244.
22.
Markham, W. T.
, & Bonjean, C. M. (1995). Community orientations of higher status female volunteers. Social Forces, 73, 1553-1572.
23.
Markham, W. T.
, & Bonjean, C. M. (1996). Employment status and the attitudes and behaviors of higher status women volunteers, 1975 and 1992: A case study. Sex Roles, 34, 695-716.
24.
McCarthy, C.The assault on AmeriCorps (1995, July 29). The Washington Post, p. A13-A13.
25.
McCarthy, K. D.
(Ed.). (1990). Lady bountiful revisited: Women, philanthropy, and power. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
26.
Odendahl, T.
(1989). The culture of elite philanthropy in the Reagan years. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 237-248.
27.
Odendahl, T.
(1990). Charity begins at home. New York: Basic Books.
28.
Ostrander, S.
(1984). Women of the upper class. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Ostrander, S.
(1987). Elite domination in private social agencies. In G. W. Domhoff & T. R. Dye (Eds.), Power elites and organizations (pp. 85-102). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Ostrander, S.
(1989). The problem of poverty and why philanthropy neglects it. In V. A. Hodgkinson, R. W. Lyman, & Associates (Eds.), The future of the nonprofit sector, (pp. 219-236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Ostrower, F.
(1995). Why the wealthy give. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Paprocki, S. L.
, & Bothwell, R. O. (1994). Corporate grantmaking: Giving to racial/ethnic populations. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
33.
Peterson, J.Former foes Bush, Clinton unite to make community service push (1997, January 25). Los Angeles Times, p. A11-A11.
34.
Plambeck, D. L.
(1985). The implication of board member composition for fund-raising success. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14, 60-66.
35.
Powell, W. W.
, & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Salamon, L.
(1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 29-49.
37.
Serious social issues targeted by points of light. (1995, August). The NonProfit Times, p. 4-4.
38.
Shogren, E.GOP assembles its private safety net welfare: Gingrich brings in activists from grassroots groups that Republicans would want to fill gaps left by huge budget cutbacks (1995, February 3). Los Angeles Times, p. A12-A12.
39.
Sleeper, J.The other Bill (1995, March 20). The New Republic, p. 16-16.
40.
Smith, S. R.
, & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Ware, A.
(1989). Between profit and the state: Intermediate organizations in Britain and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
Warren, R. L.
(1967). The interorganizational field as a focus of investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 396-419.
43.
Warren, R. L.
, Rose, S., & Bergunder, A. (1974). The structure of urban reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
44.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1974). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. S. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory (pp. 171-196). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
Weisbrod, B. A.
(1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Widmer, C.
(1987). Minority participation on boards of directors of human service agencies: Some evidence and suggestions. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 33-44.
47.
Wilson, J. Q.
(1973). Political organizations. New York: Basic Books.
48.
Witkin, B. R.
(1994). Needs assessment since 1981: The state of the practice. Evaluation Practice, 15, 17-27.
49.
Wolpert, J.
(1988). The geography of generosity: Metropolitan disparities in donations and support for amenities. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 78, 665-679.
50.
Wolpert, J.
, & Reiner, T. (1985). The not-for-profit sector in stable and growing metropolitan regions. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 20, 487-510.
51.
Zucker, L. G.
(1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. B. Bachrach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1-42). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
