Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article describes the relationship between governing boards' effective ness in private colleges and the specie factors that motivate trustees to join and serve on boards. Far more often among members of effective rather than ineffective boards, trustees' motives are institution-specific and institution-centered, springing from deep affection and a sense of connection to the college. Research results are analyzed in terms of three motivational frameworks, none of which is capable of reflecting the differ ences in motivation that distinguish members of effective boards. We offer a rudimentary new framework for differentiating boards on the basis of the extent of trustees' identification with the institution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges. (1986). Composition of Governing Boards, 1985 Washington, DC: Author.

Auerbach, Arnold J. (1961). Aspirations of People, Power, and Agency Goals . Social Work, 6, 66-73.

Blau, Peter M. (1986). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Chait, Richard P. , Thomas P. Holland , and Barbara E. Taylor . (1988). Understanding Governance: Issues in Studying the Effectiveness of Institutional Boards. College Park, MD: National Center for Postsecondary Governance and Finance.

Etzioni, Amitai. (1988). The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.

Fenn, Dan H. , Jr. (1971). Executives as Community Volunteers. Harvard Business Review, 49, 4-16, 156-157.

Foa, Uriel G. (1971). Interpersonal and Economic Resources. Science, 171, 345-351.

Glaser, Barney G. , and Anselm L. Strauss. (1974). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

Guilford, J.P. , and Benjamin Fruchter . (1978). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Holland, Thomas P. (1988). The Effectiveness of Nonprofit Organizations. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 12(2), 201-221.

11.

Holland, Thomas P. , Richard P. Chait , and Barbara E. Taylor . (1989). Board Effectiveness : Identifying and Measuring Trustee Competencies. Journal of Research in Higher Education, 30(4), 451-468.

12.

Kramer, Ralph M. (1965). Ideology, Status, and Power in Board-Executive Relations. Social Work, 10, 107-114.

13.

McClelland, David C. (1987). Human Motivation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Middleton, Melissa. (1989). "The Characteristics and Influence of Intraboard Networks : A Case Study of a Nonprofit Board of Directors." In Robert D. Herman and Jon Van Til (eds.), Nonprofit Boards of Directors (pp. 160-192). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

15.

Miles, Matthew B. , and A. Michael Huberman . (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

16.

Siegel, Sidney. (1956). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences . New York: McGraw-Hill.

17.

Widmer, Candace. (1985). Why Board Members Participate. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 14(4), 8-23.

18.

Wilson, James Q. (1973). Political Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

19.

Yin, Robert K. (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Trustee Motivation and Board Effectiveness

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References