Many theoretical and methodological difficulties have limited the develop
ment of research on the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations. After
reviewing contemporary approaches to the task of defining and distin
guishing among voluntary, nonprofit organizations, this article suggests
several workable indicators that can advance research into effectiveness,
especially if they are used in combination. It also presents and illustrates
the uses of Boolean algebra as an analytical technique that promises to
enhance comparative case study research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin, E. (1978). An Empirical Study of the Effect of Organizational Differentiation and Integration on Hospital Performance. In A. Kovner and P. Neuhauser (eds.), Health Services Management. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.
2.
Blau, Peter M., and W Richard Scott . (1962). Formal Organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.
3.
Cameron, Kim. (1981). Construct Space and Subjectivity Problems in Organizational Effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 5, 105-121.
4.
Campbell, John P. (1977). On the Nature of Organizational Effectiveness . In P. S. Goodman and J. M. Pennings (eds.), New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Clark, Peter B., and James Q. Wilson. (1961). Incentive Systems: A Theory of Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 129-166.
6.
DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter W Powell . (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields . American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
7.
Etzioni, Amitai. (1961). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations . New York: Free Press.
8.
Gamson, William A. (1975). The Strategies of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
9.
Glisson, Charles A., and Patricia Y Martin . (1980). Productivity and Efficiency in Human Service Organizations as Related to Structure, Size, and Age. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 21-37.
10.
Gordon, C. Wayne, and Nicholas Babchuk . (1966). A Topology of Voluntary Associations. In W A. Glaser and D. L. Sills (eds.), The Government of Associations . Totowa, NJ: Bedminster.
11.
Hansmann, Henry. (1980). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. Yale Law Joumal, 89, 835-901.
12.
Hansmann, Henry. (1987). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In W. W Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Hansmann, Henry. (1989). Two Nonprofit Sectors: Fee-for-Service Versus Donative Organizations. In V A. Hodgkinson , R. W Lyman, and Associates (eds.), The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes, and Policy Considerations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Holland, Thomas P., and others. (1981). Institutional Structure and Resident Outcomes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 433-444.
15.
Hopkins, Bruce R. (1987). The Law of Tax-Exempt Organizations (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
16.
Hopkins, Bruce R. (1989). Nonprofit Organizations: What Will 1989 Bring ? The Nonprofit Counsel, 6 (1), 1-4.
17.
Jenkins, J. Craig. (1987). Nonprofit Organizations and Policy Advocacy. In W W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Kramer, Ralph M. (1981). Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State. Berkeley: University of California Press .
19.
Knoke, David. (1988). Incentives in Collective Action Organizations . American Sociological Review, 53, 311-329.
20.
Milofsky, Carl, and Frank P. Romo. (1988). The Structure of Funding Arenas for Neighborhood Based Organizations. In C. Milofsky (ed.), Community Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
National Center for Charitable Statistics. ( 1987). National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities. Washington, DC: Author.
22.
Olson, Mancur. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Ostrander, Susan, and Paul Schervish. (1990). Giving and Getting: Philanthropy as a Social Relation. In J. Van Til (ed.), Critical Issues in American Philanthropy: Strengthening Theory and Practice (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory. Boston: Pitman.
25.
Price, James L., and Charles W Mueller. (1986). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Marshfield, MA:Pitman .
26.
Quinn, Robert E., and John Rohrbaugh. (1983). A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis. Management Science, 29, 363-377.
27.
Quinn, R.P., and G.L. Staines. (1979). The 1977 Quality of Employment Survey . Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
28.
Ragin, Charles C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Simon, John G. (1987). The Tax Treatment of Nonprofit Organizations: A Review of Federal and State Policies. In W W Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research HandbookNew Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
30.
Smith, David Horton, Burt R. Baldwin, and Eugene D. White . (1980). The Nonprofit Sector. In T. D. Connors (ed.), The Nonprofit Organization Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Tannenbaum, Arnold S. (1956). Control Structure and Union Functions. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 536-545.
32.
Tannenbaum, Arnold S. (1961). Control and Effectiveness in a Voluntary Organization . American Journal of Sociology, 67, 33-46.
33.
Tannenbaum, Arnold S., and R.A. Cooke. (1979). Organizational Control: A Review of Studies Employing the Control Graph Method. In C. S. Lammers and D. J. Hickson (eds.), Organizations Alike and Unlike. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
34.
Van Til, Jon. (1988). Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing Social Economy. New York: Foundation Center.
