This work explores civic engagement in Ukraine in 2022 soon after the full-scale Russian invasion. We collected responses from 998 Ukrainian citizens to understand their perspectives on civil society in the first year of the invasion, and more importantly, what motivated them to potentially act. Empirical findings support the relevance of psychological experiences of community as motivators in crisis management settings, that experiencing community can lead to prosocial behavior at various “levels” (macro, meso, micro) in the face of a national crisis, and that these experiences may be the building blocks of the development of a more formal civil society. This work helps integrate the literatures in community psychology and civil society, and also provides a mechanism for understanding the path from psychological experiences of community to individual action, informal networks, and formal organizing.
AlexanderJ. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press.
2.
AndionC. (2025). In search of a positive, historical and experimentalist definition of civil society. In BassiA.Aquino AlvesM.CorderyC. (Eds.), The future of third sector research: From theory to definitions, classifications and aggregation towards new research paths (pp. 67–80). Springer.
3.
BabajanianB. (2005). Bottom up and top down? Community development in Post-Soviet Armenia: The social fund model. Social Policy Administration, 39(4), 448–462.
4.
BaćaB. (2022). Practice theory and postsocialist civil society: Toward a New Analytical Framework. International Political Sociology, 16(1), 1–21.
5.
BaćaB. (2024). Postsocialist civil society or post socialist civil societies? A comparative analysis of regional commonalities and difference in Central and Eastern Europe. NEC Yearbook 2024-2025, 2, 11–44.
6.
BelinaA. (2022). Semi-structured interviewing as a tool for understanding informal civil society. Voluntary Sector Review, 14(2), 331–347.
7.
BoersmaK.KraiukhinaA.LarruinaR.LehotaZ.Omar NuryE. (2019). A port in the storm: Spontaneous volunteering and grassroots movements in Amsterdam. A resilient approach to the (European) refugee crisis. Social Policy & Administration, 53, 728–742.
8.
BoichakO.McKernanB. (2022). Narratives of volunteering and social change in wartime Ukraine. Cultural Sociology, 18(1), 48–71.
9.
BoydN.LarsonS. (2023a). Building community at work: An exploratory study in healthcare system management. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(5), 2276–2299.
10.
BoydN.LarsonS. (2023b). Organizational cultures that support community: Does the competing values framework help us understand experiences of community at work?Journal of Community Psychology, 51(4), 1695–1715.
11.
BoydN.MartinE. (2020). Sense of community responsibility at the forefront of crisis management. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(1), 71–83.
12.
BoydN.NowellB. (2014). Psychological sense of community: A new construct for the field of management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(2), 107–122.
13.
BoydN.NowellB. (2020). Public service motivation, sense of community, sense of community responsibility, organizational commitment, and identification: Testing an integrated model of employee well-being and engagement in a public service work context. Public Management Review, 22(7–8), 1024–1050.
14.
BoydN.NowellB.YangZ.HanoM. (2018). Sense of community, sense of community responsibility, and public service motivation as predictors of employee well-being and engagement in public sector organizations. American Review of Public Administration, 48(5), 428–443.
15.
BoydN.PiatakJ. (2026). Testing the conceptual boundaries of public service motivation, sense of community, and sense of community responsibility: Prosocial actions in voluntary, political, and community engagement. Public Management Review, 28, 869–889.
16.
CariusC.GrawJ.SchultzC. (2024). Achieving organizationality in large-scale crises: A comparative case study on the communicative constitution of spontaneous volunteer collectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 54(1), 104–128.
17.
Channell-JusticeE. (2022). Without the state: Self-organization and political activism in Ukraine (Anthropological Horizons). University of Toronto Press.
18.
CrottyJ.LjubownikowS. (2024). Adapting to survive or thrive? Civil society, the third sector and social movements in ‘post-soviet’ spaces: An introduction to the themed section. Voluntary Sector Review, 15(1), 3–11.
19.
DeHoogR.RacanskaL. (2003). The role of the nonprofit sector amid political change: Contrasting approaches to Slovakian civil society. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(3), 263–282.
DomaradzkaA. (2025). Defining civil society in the turbulent times: Lessons from Poland. In BassiA.Aquino AlvesM.CorderyC. (Eds.), The future of third sector research: From theory to definitions, classifications and aggregation towards new research paths (pp. 81–94). Springer.
22.
EkiertG.KubikJ. (2014). Myths and realities of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 46–58.
23.
FedinecC. (2023). The Ukrainian Civil Volunteer Movement during Wartime (2014-2022). In MadlovicsB.MagyarB. (Eds.), Ukraine’s patronal democracy and the Russian invasion: The Russia-Ukraine war, volume one (pp. 331–352). Central European University Press.
24.
FukuyamaF. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.
25.
GatskovaK.GatskovM. (2016). Third sector in Ukraine: Civic engagement before and after the “Euromaidan.”Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(2), 673–694.
26.
HabermasJ. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
27.
HowardM. (2002). The weakness of postcommunist civil society. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 157–169.
28.
IizukaA.AldrichD. (2022). Attracting altruists: Explaining volunteer turnout during natural hazard events in Japan. Disasters, 46(2), 526–544.
29.
KrasynskaS.MartinE. (2017). The formality of informal civil society: Ukraine’s EuroMaidan. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(1), 420–449.
30.
KubikJ. (2005). How to study civil society: The state of the art and what to do next. East European Politics and Societies, 19(1), 105–120.
31.
LjubownikowS.CrottyJ. (2014). Civil society in a transitional context: The response of health and educational NGOs to legislative changes in Russia’s industrialized regions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 759–776.
32.
LjubownikowS.CrottyJ.RodgersP. (2013). The state and civil society in post-Soviet Russia: The development of a Russian-style civil society. Progress in Development Studies, 13(2), 153–166.
33.
MartinE.NolteI. (2019). Might less accountability be more? INGO-volunteer relationships in the European refugee response. Public Management Review, 22, 408–431.
McMillanD.ChavisD. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6–23.
36.
MikheievaO.KuznetsovaI. (2024). War-time volunteering and population displacement: From spontaneous help to organized volunteering in post-2014 Ukraine. Voluntary Sector Review, 15(1), 74–91.
37.
MinakovM. (2014). Changing civil society after Maidan. Danyliw Seminar.
38.
NissenS.CarltonS.WongJ. (2022). Gaining ‘authority to operate’: Student-led emergent volunteers and established response agencies in the Canterbury earthquakes. Disasters, 46(3), 832–852.
39.
NowellB.BoydN. (2010). Viewing community as a responsibility as well as resource: Deconstructing the theoretical roots of psychological sense of community. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(7), 828–841.
40.
NowellB.BoydN. (2014). Sense of community responsibility in community collaboratives: Advancing a theory of community as resource and responsibility. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54, 229–242.
41.
PiatakJ. S.HoltS. B. (2020a). Disentangling altruism and public service motivation: Who exhibits organizational citizenship behaviour?Public Management Review, 22(7), 949–973.
42.
PiatakJ. S.HoltS. B. (2020b). Prosocial behaviors: A matter of altruism or public Service Motivation?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 504–518.
SimsaR.RamederP.AghamanoukjanA.TotterM. (2018). Spontaneous Volunteering in social crises: Self-organization and coordination. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(Suppl. 2), 103–122.
46.
StepaniukN. (2022). Wartime civilian mobilization: Demographic profile, motivations, and pathways to volunteer engagement amidst the Donbas War in Ukraine. Nationalities Papers, 50(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.82
47.
TyshchenkoY. (2019). The state of Ukrainian civil society: General Tendencies. In KorniievskyiO.TyshchenkoY.YablonskyiV. (Eds.), Ukrainian public society: Politics of expansion and inclusion, challenges and transformations. (pp. 7–24). National Institute for Strategic Studies.
48.
UdovykO. (2017). Beyond conflict and weak civil society; stories from Ukraine: Cases of grassroots initiatives for sustainable development. East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 4(2), 187–210.
WimeliusM.StrandhV. (2024). Organized crisis volunteers, COVID-19, and the political steering of crisis management in Sweden. Disasters, 48(2), Article e12604.
51.
WorschechS. (2018). Is conflict a catalyst for civil society? Conflict-related civic activism and democratization in Ukraine. In ShapovalovaN.BurlyukO. (Eds.), Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation (pp. 69–100). Ibidem Press.
52.
ZaremboK. (2017). Substituting for the State: The role of volunteers in defense reform in Post-Euromaidan Ukraine. Kyiv-Mohyla Law & Politics Journal, 3, 47–70.
53.
ZaremboK. (2018). Doing the state’s job: The impact of volunteers on Ukraine’s defense capacity after Euromaidan. In ShapovalovaN.BurlyukO. (Eds.), Civil society in post-Euromaidan Ukraine: From revolution to consolidation (pp. 101–128). Ibidem Press.
54.
ZaremboK.MartinE. (2023). Civil society and sense of community in Ukraine: From dormancy to action. European Societies, 26(4), 203–229.
