Despite the importance of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices and policies, some public service organizations do not have them. Discourse surrounding DEI has pressured many organizations to remove DEI policies given their resource dependence and stakeholder expectations. During 2024, we used Qualtrics to survey nonprofit organizations in North Carolina with budgets over $1 million (n = 111) to examine their DEI policies and consider how stakeholder pressures influence commitment to DEI. Findings reveal that pressure from staff and state government significantly influences organizational commitment to DEI. We also find that perceived amount of negative controversy surrounding DEI within organizations, communities, and the state positively affects commitment to DEI. These findings show that North Carolina’s nonprofits are doubling down on DEI, likely due to belief in their mission, alignment with marginalized communities, and commitment to long-term, systemic change, allowing them to remain steadfast in their DEI efforts despite shifting cultural and political winds.
AzevedoL.BellA. (2025). Equitable decision-making in community foundations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 35, 765–781.
2.
AzevedoL.GaynorT. S.ShelbyK.SantosG. (2021). The complexity of diversity and importance for equitable philanthropy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(3), 595–607.
3.
AzevedoL.ShiW. (2024). Teaching social equity in nonprofit management courses. In McCandlessS. A.GoodenS. T. (Eds.), Teaching social equity in public administration (pp. 232–252). Routledge.
BellM. P.BerryD.LeopoldJ.NkomoS. (2021). Making Black Lives Matter in academia: A Black feminist call for collective action against anti-blackness in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization, 28, 39–57.
6.
BellM. P.BerryD. P. (2007). Viewing diversity through different lenses: Avoiding a few blind spots. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 21–25.
7.
BerrettJ. L.HollidayB. S. (2018). The effect of revenue diversification on output creation in nonprofit organizations: A resource dependence perspective. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 1190–1201.
8.
BishuS. G.KennedyA. R. (2020). Trends and gaps: A meta-review of representative bureaucracy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 559–588.
9.
BlessettB.DodgeJ.EdmondB.GoerdelH. T.GoodenS. T.HeadleyA. M.WilliamsB. N. (2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299.
10.
BloodgoodE.Tremblay-BoireJ. (2017). Does government funding depoliticize non-governmental organizations? Examining evidence from Europe. European Political Science Review, 9(3), 401–424.
BradburyM.KelloughJ. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence on active representation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167.
14.
BrownW. A. (2002). Racial diversity and performance of nonprofit boards of directors. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 43–57.
15.
BuseK.BernsteinR. S.BilimoriaD. (2014). The influence of board diversity, board diversity policies and practices, and board inclusion behaviors on nonprofit governance practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 179–191.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
20.
DingF.RiccucciN. M. (2023). How does diversity affect public organizational performance? A meta-analysis. Public Administration, 101(4), 1367–1393.
FredericksonH. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228–237.
23.
FredetteC.Sessler BernsteinR. (2019). Ethno-racial diversity on nonprofit boards: A critical mass perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 931–952.
24.
GaynorT. S.WilsonM. E. (2020). Social vulnerability and equity: The disproportionate impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review, 80(5), 832–838.
GoodenS. T. (2015). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. Routledge.
27.
GündemirS.DovidioJ. F.HomanA. C.De DreuC. K. (2017). The impact of organizational diversity policies on minority employees’ leadership self-perceptions and goals. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(2), 172–188.
28.
GuoC.AcarM. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.
29.
HamidullahM. F.PiatakJ. S.ChenY. (2024). DEI and human resources management. In SabharwalM.ViswanathS. (Eds.), Handbook on diversity, equity, and inclusion in public administration (pp. 125–144). Edward Elgar.
30.
Hanappi-EggerE. (2012). “Shall I stay or shall I go”? On the role of diversity management for women’s retention in SET professions. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 31(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151211202790
31.
HarrisG. L. A. (2012). Multiple marginality: How the disproportionate assignment of women and minorities to manage diversity programs reinforces and multiplies their marginality. Administration & Society, 45(7), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399712445872
32.
HecklerN. (2019). Whiteness and masculinity in nonprofit organizations: Law, money, and institutional race and gender. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(3), 266–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1621659
33.
HecklerN. (2023). Critical whiteness studies as self-work for white nonprofit and government workers. Public Integrity, 25(3), 326–336.
34.
HoangT.SuhJ.SabharwalM. (2022). Beyond a numbers game? Impact of diversity and inclusion on the perception of organizational justice. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 537–555.
35.
KaoA. C. (2021). Invisibility of anti-Asian racism. AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(7), 507–511.
36.
KhazanchiR.EvansC. T.MarcelinJ. R. (2020). Racism, not race, drives inequity across the COVID-19 continuum. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), Article e2019933.
37.
KingsleyJ. D. (2016). Representative bureaucracy. In DolanJ.RosenbloomD. H. (Eds.), Representative bureaucracy (pp. 12–18). Routledge.
38.
KrauseG. A.ParkJ. (2024). Improving social equity within public organizations: Authority differentials as reference points for fostering diversity and inclusion within US federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 46(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X241286176
39.
LeeH. (2019). Does increasing racial minority representation contribute to overall organizational performance? The role of organizational mission and diversity climate. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 454–468.
40.
LeeY. J. (2023). The color of nonprofit leadership: Nonprofits with a CEO of color. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 33(4), 865–878.
41.
LeRouxK. (2020). Racial diversity and organizational performance in the US nonprofit sector. In RutherfordA.MeierK. (Eds.), Race and public administration (pp. 119–139). Routledge.
42.
LeRouxK.MedinaA. (2023). Bending the arc of nonprofit leadership toward justice: Impacts of racial representation and organizational publicness on diversifying executive leadership. Public Administration Review, 83(1), 103–116.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25.
45.
MasonD. P. (2020). Diversity and inclusion practices in nonprofit associations: A resource-dependent and institutional analysis. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 6(1), 22–43.
46.
McCandlessS.BishuS. G.Gomez HernandezM.Paredes ErasoE.SabharwalM.SantisE. L.YatesS. (2022). A long road: Patterns and prospects for social equity, diversity, and inclusion in public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 129–148.
47.
McClellandC. (2021). Exploring needs for diversity, equity, and inclusion practices in arts and culture nonprofits in Denver, Colorado. The Foundation Review, 13(1), 5.
48.
MedinaP. S.AzevedoL. (2021). Latinx COVID-19 outcomes: Expanding the role of representative bureaucracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(4), 447–461.
49.
MeierK. J. (2019). Theoretical frontiers in representative bureaucracy: New directions for research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(1), 39–56.
50.
MeyerS. J.DaleE. J.WillisK. K. M. (2021). “Where my hays at?” The status of LGBTQ people and queer theory in nonprofit research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(3), 566–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211021497
51.
MoonK. K.ChristensenR. K. (2020). Realizing the performance benefits of workforce diversity in the US federal government: The moderating role of diversity climate. Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 141–165.
52.
MumfordS. W. (2022). Doing more with less: Racial diversity in nonprofit leadership and organizational resilience. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 8, Article 57.
NgE.FitzsimmonsT.KulkarniM.OzturkM. B.AprilK.BanerjeeR.MuhrS. L. (2025). The anti-DEI agenda: navigating the impact of Trump’s second term on diversity, equity and inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 44(2), 137–150.
57.
NickelsA. E.LeachK. A. (2021). Toward a more just nonprofit sector: Leveraging a critical approach to disrupt and dismantle white masculine space. Public Integrity, 23(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1870833
OzturkO. (2021). Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: an overview. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 525–552.
62.
ParkS.LiangJ. (2020). Merit, diversity, and performance: Does diversity management moderate the effect of merit principles on governmental performance?Public Personnel Management, 49(1), 83–110.
63.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (2015). External control of organizations: Resource dependence perspective. In MinerJ. B. (Ed.), Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 355–370). Routledge.
64.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
65.
Pickett-ErwayC.SpringgateS.Stotz-GhoshS.VanceT. (2014). Difficult conversations: lessons along the journey toward inclusion. The Foundation Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1193
66.
PittsD. W.HicklinA. K.HawesD. P.MeltonE. (2010). What drives the implementation of diversity management programs? Evidence from public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 867–886. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup044
67.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5), 377–391.
68.
RaffoD. M.ClarkL. A.ArikM. (2016). Strategic responses of non-profit organizations to the economic crisis: Examining through the lenses of resource dependency and resourced-based view theories. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 48–70.
69.
RiccucciN. M. (2021). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Routledge.
70.
RiccucciN. M.Van RyzinG. G. (2017). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30.
71.
SabharwalM. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.
72.
SabharwalM.LevineH.D’AgostinoM. (2018). A conceptual content analysis of 75 years of diversity research in public administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(2), 248–267.
73.
Sessler BernsteinR.BilimoriaD. (2013). Diversity perspectives and minority nonprofit board member inclusion. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 32(7), 636–653.
74.
SmithZ.RyanV.WillsonS. (2023). Using interpretive question evaluation methods to assess race and ethnicity items. Survey Practice, 16(1), Article 1.
75.
SowaJ. E.SeldenS. C. (2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 700–710.
76.
StarrP.FreelandE. P. (2024). “People of color” as a category and identity in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50(1), 47–67.
77.
StraderE.GriffieV.IrelanP. C.KwanL. Y.NorthcottE.PandeyS. K. (2023). Race in representative bureaucracy theory: A problematizing review. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1687–1703.
78.
Study shows donors care about nonprofits’ DEI efforts. (2022). Board & Administrator for Administrators Only, 39(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ban.31426
79.
SvaraJ. H.BrunetJ. R. (2005). Social equity is a pillar of public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11(3), 253–258.
80.
SweetingK. D. (2022). Strategies to foster engagement, empathy, equity, and ethics in public service: A conceptual model for public and nonprofit administrators. Public Integrity, 24(4–5), 432–447.
WeisingerJ. Y.Borges-MéndezR.MilofskyC. (2016). Diversity in the nonprofit and voluntary sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1_Suppl.), 3S–27S.
83.
WillisK. K.NicholsonW. M.McDougleL. M. (2024). Diversity, equity, and inclusion in nonprofit management. In ViswanathS.SabharwalM.McCandlessS. A. (Eds.), Handbook on diversity, equity, and inclusion in public administration (pp. 145–155). Edward Elgar.
84.
YangM.HylandM. (2012). Re‐examining mimetic isomorphism: Similarity in mergers and acquisitions in the financial service industry. Management Decision, 50(6), 1076–1095.
