The study addresses the issue of technology and social inclusion within tactile museums, as cultural institutions that have an exhibition structure in which art can be enjoyed through touch. The aim of the work is to investigate the relationship between technological innovations (TIs) and the processes of social inclusion to understand the role of the tactile museum in promoting a broader cultural and ethical change. The research design, based on the literature that investigates the role of technologies in cultural institutions and the ways of enjoying and managing museums according to an inclusive logic, presents a qualitative case study, the Omero Tactile Museum of Ancona (OTMA), among the most significant in the world offering museum services based on tactile perception. The results of the empirical analysis highlight a close relationship between TIs and the management of social inclusion in the investigated institution.
AgostinoD.ArnaboldiM.LorenziniE. (2020). Verso un «new normal» dei musei post- COVID 19: quale ruolo per il digitale? [Toward a “new normal” for museums post-COVID-19: What role for digital? Cultural Economy] Economia della Cultura, 30(1), 79–83.
2.
AsonguS. A.NnannaJ.Acha-AnyiP. N. (2020). Inequality and gender economic inclusion: The moderating role of financial access in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic Analysis and Policy, 65, 173–185.
3.
AlvessonaM.SandbergJ. (2020). The problematizing review: A counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1290–1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12582
4.
BakhshiH.ThrosbyD. (2012). New technologies in cultural institutions: Theory, evidence and policy implications. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 18(2), 205–222.
5.
BelfioreE. (2004). Auditing culture. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2), 183–202.
6.
BhallaA.LapeyreF. (1997). Social exclusion: Towards an analytical and operational framework. Development and Change, 28(3), 413–433.
7.
BradshawJ.KempP.BaldwinS.RoweA. (2004). The drivers of social exclusion. A review of the literature for the Social Exclusion Unit in the Breaking the Cycle series. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Publication.
8.
BruniL.TufanoF. (2015). The value of vulnerability: The transformative capacity of risky trust (CeDEx Discussion Paper Series, No. 2015–19). Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics.
9.
Cerdan ChiscanoM.Jiménez-ZarcoA. I. (2021). Towards an inclusive museum management strategy: An exploratory study of consumption experience in visitors with disabilities – The case of the CosmoCaixa science museum. Sustainability, 13(2), 660.
10.
CerquettiM.CutriniE. (2023). Structure, people, and relationships: A multidimensional method to assess museum resilience. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1), 130–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211068409
11.
CharbandY.Jafari NavimipourN. (2016). Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 1131–1151.
12.
ChenK. K.LuneH.QueenE. L. (2013). How values shape and are shaped by nonprofit and voluntary organizations: The current state of the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 856–885.
13.
DarcyS. (2005). Disability and tourism: A bibliography, school of leisure, sport and tourism. University of Technology, Sydney.
14.
Della LuciaM.PellacaniM. (2021). Social inclusion in museums and visual disabilities: The State Tactile Museum Omero of Ancona. In CastaldoS.Li DestriA. M.PencoL.UgoliniM. (Eds.), Leveraging intersections in management theory and practice (pp. 211–216). Fondazione CUEIM.
15.
EspositoP.BragaASancinoA.RicciP. (2023). The strategic governance of the digital accounting environment: Insights from the virtual museums. Meditary Accountancy Research, 31(2), 366–380.
16.
FrisoV.MarchesaniS. (2022). Beyond barriers. The challenge of artistic and cultural accessibility for people with visual impairments. Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, 10(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.7346/sipes-02-2022-18
GinleyB. (2013). Museums: A whole new world for visually impaired people. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 5–12.
19.
GrassiniA. (2018). L’accessibilità: la via maestra verso un’arte nuova [Accessibility: the main road to a new art], in Cetorelli G. and Guido M. R. (eds) (2018), Il Patrimonio Culturale per tutti. Fruibilità, riconoscibilità, accessibilità. Proposte, interventi, itinerari per l’accoglienza ai beni storico-artistici e alle strutture turistiche [Accessibility. Proposals, Interventions, and Itineraries for the Reception of Historical-Artistic Heritage and Tourist Facilities]. Quaderni della Valorizzazione-NS, 4, Ministero dei Beni, delle Attività Culturali e del Turismo, Direzione generale Musei, Roma [Ministry of Cultural Heritage, Activities and Tourism, General Directorate of Museums, Rome].
20.
HollinsH. (2010). Reciprocity, accountability, empowerment: Emancipatory principles and practices in the museum. In SandellR.DoddJ.Garland-ThomsonR. (Eds.), Re-presenting disability (pp. 228–243). Routledge.
21.
ISTAT. (2019). Knowing the world of disability: People, relationship and institution.
22.
JayJ.Van BurenH. J.III (2021). Entrepreneurship, conflict, and peace: The role of inclusion and value creation. Business & Society, 61(6), 1558–1593.
KaradumanH.AlanÜ.YiğitE. Ö. (2023). Beyond ‘do not touch’: The experience of a three-dimensional printed artifacts museum as an alternative to traditional museums for visitors who are blind and partially sighted. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(3), 811–824.
25.
KawashimaN. (2006). Audience development and social inclusion in Britain: Tensions, contradictions and paradoxes in policy and their implications for cultural management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 12(1), 55–72.
26.
KeaneyE. (2006). Public value and the arts: Literature review. Arts Council.
27.
KumarD.GuptaP. (2022). Social innovation for sustainability and social inclusion. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 18(3–4), 169–177.
28.
LazzerettiL.SartoriA. (2016). Digitization of cultural heritage and business model innovation: The case of the Uffizi Gallery in Florence. Capitale Culturale, XIV, 945–970.
29.
López SintasJ.García ÁlvarezE.Pérez RubialesE. (2014). Art museum visitors: Interaction strategies for sharing experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(3), 241–259.
30.
MaddikuntaP. K. R.PhamQ.PrabadeviB.DeepaN.DevK.GadekalluT. R.RubyR.LiyanageM. (2021). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 26(2), 1–19.
31.
McMillenR. (2015). Museum disability access: Social inclusion opportunities through innovative new media practices. Pacific Journal, 10, 95–107.
32.
McMillenR.AlterF. (2017). Social media, social inclusion, and museum disability access. Museums & Social Issues, 12(2), 115–125.
33.
MillerG.Torres-DelgadoA. (2023). Measuring sustainable tourism: A state of the art review of sustainable tourism indicators. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(7), 1483–1496.
34.
MondalS.SamaddarK. (2020). Issues and challenges in implementing sharing economy in tourism: A triangulation study. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 32(1), 64–81.
35.
MoralesL.GiugniM. (2011). Political opportunities, social capital and the political inclusion of immigrants in European cities. In MoralesL.GiugniM. (Eds.), Social capital, political participation and migration in europe. Migration, Minorities and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302464_1
36.
MorseN. (2019). The social role of museums: From social inclusion to health and wellbeing. In O’NeillM.HooperG. (Eds.), Connecting museums (pp. 48–65). Routledge.
37.
MuukkonenM. (2009). Framing the field: Civil society and related concepts. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333245
38.
NaumesW.NaumesM.J. (2006). The art and craft of case writing (2nd ed.). M.E. Sharp.
39.
NavarreteC. C. (2013). Creative thinking in digital game design and development: A case study. Computers & Education, 69, 320–331.
40.
NavarreteT. (2019). Digital heritage tourism: Innovations in museums. World Leisure Journal, 61(3), 200–214.
41.
OlivaresA.PiatakJ. (2022). Exhibiting inclusion: An examination of race, ethnicity, and museum participation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 33(1), 121–133.
42.
Orea-GinerA.Muñoz-MazónA.Villacé-MolineroT.Fuentes-MoraledaL. (2022). Cultural tourist and user experience with artificial intelligence: A holistic perspective from the Industry 5.0 approach. Journal of Tourism Futures, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-04-2022-0115
43.
ParodiG.SciulliD. (2012). Disability and social exclusion dynamics in Italian households. University Library of Munich.
44.
PegnoM.BrindzaC. (2021). Redefining curatorial leadership and activating community expertise to build equitable and inclusive art museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 64(2), 343–362.
45.
RichardsonF. L. (2023). Patterns of tactility and sound: Collaboration through sensory textile practice with the visually impaired at Macclesfield museums [Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield].
46.
SandellR. (1998). Museums as agents of social inclusion. Museum Management and Curatorship, 17, 401–418.
47.
ScapensR. W. (2004). Doing case study research. In HumphreyC.LeeB. (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research: A behind the scenes view of using qualitative research methods (pp. 257–279). Elsevier.
48.
SchepersJ.WetzelsM. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects. Information & Management, 44(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007
49.
SekharC. (2020). The inclusion of sustainability in management education institutions: Assessing critical barriers using the DEMATEL method. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(2), 200–227.
50.
Sibilio ParriB. (2004). Creare e valorizzare i distretti museali [Creating and enhancing museum districts]. Franco Angeli.
51.
Sibilio ParriB.DonatoF. (Eds.). (2015). Governare e gestire le aziende culturali [Governing and managing cultural companies]. Franco Angeli.
52.
SilverH.MillerS. M. (2003). Social exclusion. Indicators, 2(2), 5–21.
53.
SordiA. L.TateW.HuangF. (2022). Going beyond supplier diversity to economic inclusion: Where are we now and where do we go from here?Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(2), 100751.
54.
TsatsouP. (2020). Digital inclusion of people with disabilities: A qualitative study of intra-disability diversity in the digital realm. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(9), 995–1010.
55.
Van DoornJ.MendeM.NobleS. M.HullandJ.OstromA. L.GrewalD.PetersenJ. A. (2017). Domo arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679272
56.
VazR.FernandesP. O.VeigaA. C. R. (2018). Designing an interactive exhibitor for assisting blind and visually impaired visitors in tactile exploration of original museum pieces. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 561–570.
57.
World Health Organization. (2019). World report on vision. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. World Health Organization.
58.
YinR. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
