This article investigates the transition of North-South development partnerships toward more balanced dependence structures, using a case study in global health to illuminate the Southern partner’s strategic evolution. While extant nonprofit literature emphasizes how Southern partners reduce the perceived cost of dependence through antagonistic approaches, our analysis reveals how a Southern partner reduced reliance not by resisting, but by engaging with the established North-South dynamic to foster South-South cooperation. We trace this evolution through key stages, highlighting changes in the Southern partner’s resource profile as key enablers of these shifts. Our study connects nonprofit literature on North-South, triangular, and South-South cooperation, emphasizing how diverse resource profiles underpin and facilitate these partnership models. As unbalanced dependence structures are inherently unstable, evolutions toward more balanced dependence structures are of interest to recipients and donors alike and to the stakeholders they seek to serve.
AppeS. (2018). Directions in a post-aid world? South–South development cooperation and CSOs in Latin America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9838-0
2.
AshmanD. (2001). Strengthening North-South partnerships for sustainable development. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001301004
3.
BiermannR.HarschM. (2017). Resource dependence theory. In KoopsJ.BiermannR. (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 135–155). Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-36039-7
4.
BouchardM.RauffletE. (2019). Domesticating the beast: A “resource profile” framework of power relations in nonprofit–business collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(6), 1186–1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764019853378
5.
BurlakotiR. R.LynchD.HaldeC.BeachT.DahalS.DebnathS. C. (2012). Organic agriculture project in Nepal: An international twinning partnership program initiative. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92(6), 997–1003. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps2011-198
6.
CadéeF.NieuwenhuijzeM. J.Lagro-JanssenA. L. M.De VriesR. (2016). The state of the art of twinning, a concept analysis of twinning in healthcare. Globalization and Health, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-016-0205-5
7.
CasciaroT.PiskorskiM. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.2.167
8.
ChiambarettoP. (2015). Resource dependence and power-balancing operations in alliances: The role of market redefinition strategies. M@n@gemen, 3, 205–233. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.183.0205
9.
CloutierC.LangleyA. (2020). What makes a process theoretical contribution?Organization Theory, 1(1), Article 2631787720902473. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720902473
10.
DreesJ. M.HeugensP. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1666–1698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471391
11.
DreherA.NunnenkampP.ThieleR. (2011). Are “new” donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between nonDAC and DAC donor countries. World Development, 39(11), 1950–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.024
12.
EbrahimA. (2002). Information struggles: The role of information in the reproduction of NGO-funder relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 84–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002311004
13.
ElbersW.ArtsB. (2011). Keeping body and soul together: Southern NGOs’ strategic responses to donor constraints. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 713–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311419388
14.
ElbersW.SchulpenL. (2011). Decision making in partnerships for development: Explaining the influence of local partners. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010366304
15.
ElbersW.SchulpenL. (2013). Corridors of power: The institutional design of North–South NGO partnerships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 48–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9332-7
FosterM. K.MeinhardA. G. (2002). A regression model explaining predisposition to collaborate. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764002238100
18.
GatignonA. (2022). The double-edged sword of boundary-spanning Corporate Social Responsibility programs. Strategic Management Journal, 43(10), 2156–2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3403
HarrowJ.SolaY. (2023). Buried treasure? Local foundations’ knowledge sharing in Jordan and Palestine. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(2), 493–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221102130
22.
HungC.HagerM. A. (2019). The impact of revenue diversification on nonprofit financial health: A meta-analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018807080
MorvaridiB.HughesC. (2018). South–South cooperation and neoliberal hegemony in a post-aid world. Development and Change, 49(3), 867–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12405
27.
MurphyD. F.StottL. (2021). Partnerships for the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustainability, 13(2), Article 658. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020658
28.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper & Row.
29.
PrenticeT. (2008). Health, history, and hard choices: Funding dilemmas in a fast-changing world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(Suppl. 4), 63S–75S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007310533
30.
RaeymaeckersP.Van PuyveldeS. (2021). Nonprofit advocacy coalitions in times of COVID-19: Brokerage, crowdfunding, and advocacy roles. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1304–1317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764021991675
SanderA. (2021). Reclaiming partnership–“Rightful resistance” in a Norths/Souths cooperation. Third World Quarterly, 42(11), 2538–2551. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1957672
StapletonO.StadtlerL.Van WassenhoveL. N. (2011). Private–humanitarian supply chain partnerships on the silk road. In HaksözÇ.SeshadriS.IyerA. V. (Eds.), Managing supply chains on the silk road: Strategy, performance, and risk (1st ed., pp. 217–238). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11368
35.
TranL.AbouAssiK. (2021). Local organizational determinants of local-international NGO collaboration. Public Management Review, 23(6), 865–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1708436
36.
WillemsJ.WaldnerC. J.VogelD. (2019). Reputation spillover effects from grant-providing institutions. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(1), 9–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nml.21357
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
