This article develops and tests a theoretical model of volunteering during crises suggesting a dual structure referring to the mobilization of two types of volunteers engaging in different voluntary tasks. By combining theories on civic virtue and crisis adaption, I develop and test the theoretical model using survey data on a representative random sample of Danish adults collected during the pandemic in 2020. The results of the analysis support some parts of the model as volunteers fall into two groups. One group of previous volunteers had high levels of generalized trust and took on both ordinary volunteering and COVID-19-specific voluntary tasks. Another group of new volunteers had high levels of anxiety and almost exclusively engaged in COVID-19-specific tasks. The article contributes to volunteering and crisis research by demonstrating how both mechanisms of civic responsibility and crisis adaption influence volunteering during crises.
Al-DahashH.ThayaparanM.KulatungaU. (2016). Understanding the terminologies: Disaster, crisis and emergency. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, ARCOM 2016 (pp. 1191–1200). ARCOM. https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/872x5
AndersenD.ToubølJ.KirkegaardS.Bang CarlsenH. (2022). Imposed volunteering: Gender and caring responsibilities during the COVID-19 lockdown. The Sociological Review, 70(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211052396
4.
BinderS. B.BakerC. K. (2017). Culture, local capacity, and outside aid: A community perspective on disaster response after the 2009 tsunami in American Sāmoa. Disasters, 41(2), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12203
5.
BoinA.EkengrenM.RhinardM. (2020). Hiding in plain sight: Conceptualizing the creeping crisis. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 11(2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12193
6.
BonannoG. A.BrewinC. R.KaniastyK.GrecaA. M. L. (2010). Weighing the costs of disaster: Consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387086
7.
CarlsenH. B.ToubølJ.BrinckerB. (2021). On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: The impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23(Suppl. 1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270
8.
ChawłowskaE.StaszewskiR.LipiakA.GiernaśB.KarasiewiczM.BazanD.WysockiJ. (2021). Student volunteering as a solution for undergraduate health professions education: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, Article 633888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.633888
9.
CheungC. K.LoT. W.LiuS. C. (2015). Relationships between volunteerism and social responsibility in young volunteers. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26, 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9486-6
10.
ClarkS.GadeikytėG.Kasper, . (2011). People power: Natural disasters as catalyst for civic agency. LCC Liberal Arts Studies, IV, 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2011.622653
11.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243
12.
DawsonC.BakerP. L.DowellD. (2019). Getting into the “Giving Habit”: The dynamics of volunteering in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(5), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00133-4
13.
DederichsK. (2023). Volunteering in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: Who started and who quit?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1458–1474. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221122814
14.
DohertyB.HayesG. (2018). Tactics and strategic action. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH.McCammonH. J. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 269–288). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119168577.ch15
15.
DomaradzkiJ. (2022). “Who else if not we.” Medical students’ perception and experiences with volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Poznan, Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042314
16.
DynesR. R. (1970). Organizational involvement and changes in community structure in disaster. American Behavioral Scientist, 13(3), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427001300313
17.
DynesR. R.AguirreB. E. (1979). Organizational adaptation to crises: Mechanisms of coordination and structural change. Crisis Management, 3(1), 320. http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/386
FerrisA.MarreseT.CnaanR.ChoiD.HandyF. (2024). Who volunteers at refugee and immigrant nonprofits? Results from two studies. In Nonprofit Policy Forum. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2023-0066
20.
GrantE. M.FrenchJ. I.BolicM.HammondS. I. (2024). Volunteering trajectories and the COVID-19 pandemic: Persistent, emergent, and former volunteers and personal, moral, and prudential reasoning. Journal of Adolescent Research, 39(6), 1693–1719. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241256584
21.
HaraokaT.OjimaT.MurataC.HayasakaS. (2012). Factors influencing collaborative activities between non-professional disaster volunteers and victims of earthquake disasters. PLoS ONE7(10), Article e47203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047203
22.
HenriksenL. S.Koch-NielsenI.RosdahlD. (2008). Formal and informal volunteering in a Nordic context: The case of Denmark. Journal of Civil Society, 4(3), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680802559685
23.
HustinxL.HandyF.CnaanR. A.BrudneyJ. L.PessiA. B.YamauchiN. (2010). Social and cultural origins of motivations to volunteer: A comparison of university students in six countries. International Sociology, 25(3), 349–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580909360297
24.
JegermalmM.HermansenJ.FladmoeA. (2019). Beyond voluntary organizations and the welfare state: Patterns of informal helping in the Scandinavian countries. In HenriksenL. S.StrømsnesK.SvedbergL. (Eds.), Civic engagement in Scandinavia: Volunteering, informal help and giving in Denmark, Norway and Sweden (pp. 95–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98717-0_4
25.
KendraJ.ClayL.GillK.TrivediJ.MarloweV.AguirreB.LinksJ. (2021). Community resilience: Toward a framework for an integrated, interdisciplinary model of disaster. Natural Hazards Review, 22(4), 04021049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000495
26.
KendraJ. M.ClayL. A.GillK. B. (2018). Resilience and disasters. In SerpeR. T. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 87–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_5
27.
LaLoneM. B. (2012). Neighbors helping neighbors: An examination of the social capital mobilization process for community resilience to environmental disasters. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1936724412458483
28.
LeeY. J.BrudneyJ. L. (2012). Participation in formal and informal volunteering: Implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21060
29.
LettieriE.MasellaC.RadaelliG. (2009). Disaster management: Findings from a systematic review. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 18(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560910953207
30.
LindseyR.MohanJ.BullochS.MetcalfeE. (2018). Volunteering trajectories: Individual patterns of volunteering over the life course. In MohanJ.LindseyR. (Eds.), Continuity and change in voluntary action (pp. 153–182). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447324867.ch007
31.
LoweS.FothergillA. (2003). A need to help: Emergent volunteer behavior after September 11th. In MondayJ. L. (Ed.), Beyond September 11th: An account of post-disaster research (pp. 293–314). University of Colorado.
32.
MakH. W.FancourtD. (2022). Predictors of engaging in voluntary work during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyses of data from 31,890 adults in the UK. Perspectives in Public Health, 142(5), 287–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913921994146
33.
MaoG.Fernandes-JesusM.NtontisE.DruryJ. (2021). What have we learned about COVID-19 volunteering in the UK? A rapid review of the literature. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11390-8
34.
MarjanovicZ.GreenglassE. R.StruthersC. W.FayeC. (2009). Helping following natural disasters: A social-motivational analysis 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(11), 2604–2625. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00540.x
MeijerenM.LubbersM.ScheepersP. (2023). Socio-structural determinants in volunteering for humanitarian organizations: A resource-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(4), 1058–1076. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221114821
37.
MeijerenM.LubbersM.ScheepersP. (2024). Assessing the “why” in volunteering for refugees: Exploring volunteer motivations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00574-y
38.
MiaoQ.SchwarzS.SchwarzG. (2021). Responding to COVID-19: Community volunteerism and coproduction in China. World Development, 137, 105128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105128
39.
MirantiR.EvansM. (2019). Trust, sense of community, and civic engagement: Lessons from Australia. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22119
40.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Indiana University Press.
41.
NakagawaY.ShawR. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters, 22(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072700402200101
42.
NesbitR. (2012). The influence of major life cycle events on volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011429181
43.
NorrisF. H.MurrellS. A. (1988). Prior experience as a moderator of disaster impact on anxiety symptoms in older adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930020
44.
PaikA.Navarre-JacksonL. (2011). Social networks, recruitment, and volunteering: Are social capital effects conditional on recruitment?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009354647
45.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
46.
RaiberK.VerbakelE.de BoerA. (2022). Testing the informal care model: Intrapersonal change in care provision intensity during the first lockdown of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Ageing, 19(4), 1287–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00713-2
47.
RamaekersM. J.VerbakelE.KraaykampG. (2024). Decline in informal helping during the first COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal analysis of Dutch data. European Societies, 26, 690–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2200503
48.
RotoloT.WilsonJ.DietzN. (2015). Volunteering in the United States in the aftermath of the foreclosure crisis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 924–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014546669
49.
SalamonL. M.AnheierH. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9, 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985
SiddiqiM. U. A.GiordonoL.ZanoccoC.StelmachG.FloraJ.BoudetH. (2023). Disaster preparedness and community helping behaviour in the wake of the 2020 Oregon wildfires. Disasters, 47(4), 1138–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12584
52.
SiebersV.GradusR.GrotensR. (2019). Citizen engagement and trust: A study among citizen panel members in three Dutch municipalities. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.010
SteffenS. L.FothergillA. (2009). 9/11 volunteerism: A pathway to personal healing and community engagement. The Social Science Journal, 46(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2008.12.005
55.
TalòC.MannariniT.RochiraA. (2014). Sense of community and community participation: A meta-analytic review. Social Indicators Research, 117, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0347-2
56.
TillyC. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.
57.
TuckerR.GearhartM. C. (2022). Social ties and collective efficacy as predictors of volunteering. Community Development, 53(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1943697
58.
TwiggJ.MoselI. (2017). Emergent groups and spontaneous volunteers in urban disaster response. Environment and Urbanization, 29(2), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247817721413
59.
Van IngenE.BekkersR. (2015). Generalized trust through civic engagement? Evidence from five national panel studies. Political Psychology, 36(3), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12523
60.
WakefieldJ. R. H.BoweM.KelleziB. (2022). Who helps and why? A longitudinal exploration of volunteer role identity, between-group closeness, and community identification as predictors of coordinated helping during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 907–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12523
61.
WangL.MookL.HandyF. (2017). An empirical examination of formal and informal volunteering in Canada. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9725-0
62.
WearingS.BeirmanD.GrabowskiS. (2020). Engaging volunteer tourism in post-disaster recovery in Nepal. Annals of Tourism Research, 80, 102802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.102802
63.
WhittakerJ.McLennanB.HandmerJ. (2015). A review of informal volunteerism in emergencies and disasters: Definition, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 13, 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.07.010
64.
YangZ. (2021). Understanding spontaneous volunteering in crisis: Towards a needs-based approach of explanation. The Social Science Journal, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1884778
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
