This article explores the relationship between solicitation messages posted by nonprofit organizations on their Facebook profile and attracting donations during online fundraising events. Recent studies suggest that certain types of messages are more effective at spurring donors to give, but the evidence base is founded mainly on experimental designs. We use observational data for 752 nonprofits that participated in one or both of the Omaha Gives fundraising events in 2015 and 2020. Using the total amount of money donated to each organization as our outcome, we find nonprofits that post more diverse solicitation messages raise more money during online fundraising events. Consistent with previous studies, social media network size and activity (likes, posts, and shares) are once again important factors in explaining fundraising success. Our results provide deeper insights into the nuances of social media strategies for attracting donors and raising funds.
AllisonP. (1999). Multiple regression: A primer. Pine Forge Press.
2.
BaekT.YoonS. (2022). Pride and gratitude: Egoistic versus altruistic appeals in social media advertising. Journal of Business Research, 142, 499–511.
3.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.
4.
BhatiA.McDonnellD. (2020). Success in an online giving day: The role of social media in fundraising. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(1), 74–92.
5.
BortreeD.SeltzerT. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319.
6.
BrionesR.KuchB.LiuB.JinY. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37–43.
7.
BürgerT. (2015). Use of digital advocacy by German nonprofit foundations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 41(4), 523–525.
8.
CampbellD.LambrightK. (2020). Terms of engagement: Facebook and Twitter use among nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 30(4), 545–568.
9.
CampbellD.LambrightK.WellsC. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663.
10.
CarboniJ.MaxwellS. (2015). Effective social media engagement for nonprofits: What matters?Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 1(1), 18–28.
11.
CastilloM.PetrieR.WardellC. (2014). Fundraising through online social networks: A field experiment on peer-to-peer solicitation. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 29–35.
12.
CryderC.LoewensteinG.SeltmanH. (2013). Goal gradient in helping behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1078–1083.
13.
DaiH.ZhangD. (2019). Prosocial goal pursuit in crowdfunding: Evidence from kickstarter. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(3), 498–517.
14.
DanielJ. L.CurleyC.WalkM. (2024). Message (in)congruence: Tweeting while completing for donations. Communication and the Public, 9, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473231224822
15.
DuncanB. (2004). A theory of impact philanthropy. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 2159–2180.
16.
Elvira-LorillaT.Garcia-RodriguezI.Romero-MerinoM.Santamaria-MariscalM. (2024). The role of social media in nonprofit organizations’ fundraising. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 53, 1353–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640231213286
17.
EnjolrasB. (2023). Determinants of voluntary organizations’ attention on Facebook: The case of Norwegian voluntary organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1308–1330.
GuidryJ.WatersR.SaxtonG. (2014). Moving social marketing beyond personal change to social change. Journal of Social Marketing, 4(3), 240–260.
20.
GuoC.SaxtonG. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.
21.
GuoC.SaxtonG. (2018). Speaking and being heard: How nonprofit advocacy organizations gain attention on social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 5–26.
22.
GuoC.SaxtonG. (2020). The quest for attention: Nonprofit advocacy in a social media age. Stanford University Press.
23.
HacklerD.SaxtonG. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: Increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 474–487.
24.
HarrisE.NeelyD.SaxtonG. (2023). Social media, signaling, and donations: Testing the financial returns on nonprofits’ social media investment. Review of Accounting Studies, 28, 658–688.
25.
HuangY.LinY.SaxtonG. (2016). Give me a like: How HIV/AIDS nonprofit organizations can engage their audience on Facebook. AIDS Education and Prevention, 28(6), 539–556.
26.
KangS.NortonH. (2004). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals?Public Relations Review, 30(3), 279–284.
27.
LaceteraN.MacisM.MeleA. (2016). Viral altruism? Charitable giving and social contagion in online networks. Sociological Science, 3, 202–238.
28.
LeeY. (2021). Liked on Facebook, liked for real? Nonprofits’ online popularity and financial performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(3), 609–621.
29.
LiP.MenL.YueC. (2020). An exploratory study of stewardship for Chinese nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 25(2), 1–12.
30.
LovejoyK.SaxtonG. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353.
31.
MildeK.YawsonR. (2017). Strategies for social media use in nonprofits. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 18(1), 19–27.
OlinskiM.SzamrowskiP. (2021). Facebook as an engagement tool: How are public benefit organizations building relationships with their public?PLOS ONE, 16(9), Article e0256880. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256880
34.
SaxtonG.WangL. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868.
35.
SaxtonG.WatersR. (2014). What do stakeholders like on Facebook? Examining public reactions to nonprofit organizations’ informational, promotional, and community-building messages. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 280–299.
36.
SmithJ.McSweeneyA. (2007). Charitable giving: The effectiveness of a revised theory of planned behaviour model in predicting donating intentions and behaviour. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17(5), 363–386.
37.
SuhJ. (2022). Revenue sources matter to nonprofit communication? An examination of museum communication and social media engagement. Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 34(3), 271–290.
38.
SunR.AsencioH. (2019). Using social media to increase nonprofit organizational capacity. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 392–404.
39.
SvenssonP.MahoneyT.HambrickM. (2015). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: A study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1086–1106.
40.
WatersR.BurnettE.LammA.LucasJ. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106.
41.
WatersR.FeneleyK. (2013). Virtual stewardship in the age of new media: Have nonprofit organizations’ moved beyond Web 1.0 strategies?International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(3), 216–230.
42.
WatersR.JamalJ. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324.
43.
XiaoA.HuangY.BortreeD.WatersR. (2022). Designing social media fundraising messages: An experimental approach to understanding how message concreteness and framing influence donation intentions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(4), 832–856.
44.
ZhouH.PanQ. (2016). Information, community, and action on Sina-Weibo: How Chinese philanthropic NGOs use social media. Voluntas, 27(5), 2433–2457.
