Voluntary certification that signals nonprofit organizations’ legitimacy has been found to be positively related to charitable donations in Europe and North America. However, whether these proxies of organizational legitimacy matter under authoritarian regimes where political connections are deemed critical for resource acquisition has not been explored. Based on a sample of 2,021 Chinese foundations, this article finds that organizational legitimacy achieved through certification is tied to an increase in charitable donations. Meanwhile, organizational legitimacy tends to negatively moderate the relationship between foundations’ political affiliation and charitable donations. That is, certification lifts the amount of charitable donations to civic foundations that are not formally affiliated with the state more than it does for politically affiliated foundations. As the first quantitative study on the effect of voluntary nonprofit certification programs on charitable donations outside Western democracies, this article contributes to our understanding of fundraising in China and other authoritarian states.
AdenaM.AlizadeJ.BohnerF.HarkeJ.MestersF. (2019). Quality certification for nonprofits, charitable giving, and donors’ trust: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 159, 75–100.
2.
BekkersR. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615.
3.
BrodyE. (2002). Accountability and public trust. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 471–498). Brookings Institution.
4.
ChengY.WuZ. (2021). The contingent value of political connections on donations to Chinese foundations: Exploring the moderating role of transparency. Administration & Society, 53(1), 36–63.
FengN. C.NellyD. G.SlattenL. A. D. (2016). Accountability standards for nonprofit organizations: Do organizations benefit from certification programs?International Journal of Public Administration, 39(6), 470–479.
7.
FengN. C.NellyD. G.SlattenL. A. D. (2019). Stakeholder groups and accountability accreditation of non-profit organizations. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 31(2), 218–236.
8.
FischerR. L.WilskerA.YoungD. R. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 662–681.
9.
ForbesK. F.ZampelliE. M. (2011). An assessment of alternative structural models of philanthropic behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1148–1167.
10.
GalaskiewiczJ.BielefeldW. (1998). Nonprofit organizations in an age of uncertainty. Aldine de Gruyter.
11.
GibelmanM.GelmanS. R. (2004). A loss of credibility: Patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(4), 355–381.
12.
GugertyM. K. (2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 243–273.
13.
GuoC. (2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effects of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 458–473.
14.
GuoC.LaiW. (2019). Community foundations in China: In search of identity?VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(4), 647–663.
15.
HeissA. (2019). NGOs and authoritarianism. In DaviesT. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of NGOs and international relations (pp. 557–572). Routledge.
16.
HendersonS. (2011). Civil society in Russia: State-society relations in the post-Yeltsin era. Problems of Post-communism, 58(3), 11–27.
17.
HoP. (2007). Embedded activism and political change in a semiauthoritarian context. China Information, 21(2), 187–209.
18.
HsuC. L.JiangY. (2015). An institutional approach to Chinese NGOs: State alliance versus state avoidance resource strategies. The China Quarterly, 221, 100–122.
19.
HsuJ.HasmathR. (2017). A maturing civil society in China? The role of knowledge and professionalization in the development of NGOs. China Information, 31(1), 22–42.
20.
HuM.KongD. (2021). Examining Chinese charitable giving under state intervention: A political participation perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211057438
21.
HwangH.PowellW. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.
22.
JiaX. (2011). Civil organization-government relationships: Functional cooperation and power dilemmas. In WangM. (Ed.), Emerging civil society in China, 1978–2008 (pp. 209–237). Brill.
23.
JohnsonJ. G.NiN. (2015). The impact of political connections on donations to Chinese NGOs. International Public Management Journal, 18(4), 514–535.
24.
KangX. (2018). Moving toward neo-totalitarianism: A political-sociological analysis of the evolution of administrative absorption of society in China. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 9(1), 1–8.
25.
LiH.LoC. W.TangS. (2017). Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 103–117.
26.
LiH.TangS. Y.LoC. W. H. (2018). The institutional antecedents of managerial networking in Chinese environmental NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 325–346.
27.
LiM.TaoR.SuF. (2020). Bringing politics back in charitable giving: Evidence from donations after China’s Sichuan earthquake. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(2), 272–291.
28.
LivshinA.WeitzR. (2006). Civil society and philanthropy under Putin. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(3), 7–12.
29.
MaJ.WangQ.DongC.LiH. (2017). The research infrastructure of Chinese foundations, a database for Chinese civil society studies. Scientific Data, 4, 170094.
30.
MaQ. (2006). Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society?. Routledge.
31.
NewmanC.HenchionM.MatthewsA. (2003). A double-hurdle model of Irish household expenditure on prepared meals. Applied Economics, 35(9), 1053–1061.
32.
NguyenP. A.DoanD. R. H. (2015). Giving in Vietnam: A nascent third sector with potential for growth. In WiepkingP.HandyF. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 473–487). Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
NiN.ZhanX. (2017). Embedded government control and nonprofit revenue growth. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 730–742.
34.
OrtmannA.MyslivecekJ. (2010). Certification and self-regulation of nonprofits, and the institutional choice between them. In SeamanB. A.YoungD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on nonprofit economics and management (pp. 280–290). Edward Elgar Publishing.
35.
ParsonsL. M. (2007). The impact of financial information and voluntary disclosures on contributions to not-for-profit organizations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), 179–196.
36.
PearsonM. M. (2007). Governing the Chinese economy: Regulatory reform in the service of the state. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 718–730.
RichterJ.HatchW. (2013). Organizing civil society in Russia and China: A comparative approach. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 26(4), 323–347.
42.
SaxtonG. D.WangL. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868.
43.
SlattenL. A. D.GuidryB. N.AustinW. (2011). Accreditation and certification in the non-profit sector: Organizational and economic implications. Organization Management Journal, 8, 112–127.
44.
SmithD. H.MoldavanovaA.KrasynskaS. (Eds.). (2018). The nonprofit sector in Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. Brill.
45.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
46.
ToeplerS.FröhlichC. (2020). Advocacy in authoritarian contexts: The case of disability NGOs in Russia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(11/12), 1473–1489.
47.
ToeplerS.ZimmerA.FröhlichC.ObuchK. (2020). The changing space for NGOs: Civil society in authoritarian and hybrid regimes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31, 649–662.
48.
WangH.QianC. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.
49.
WangQ. (2018a). Have foundations become an independent sector in China? An examination of the links between foundations and the state. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 68–73.
50.
WangQ. (2018b). A typological study of the recent development and landscape of foundations in China. Chinese Political Science Review, 3(3), 297–321.
51.
WangQ. (2020). Government control, governance and spatial distribution: What we have learned from the Research Infrastructure of Chinese Foundations. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 33–45.
52.
WangQ. (2021a). The development and operation of foundations in China. The Foundation Review, 13(1), 36–56.
53.
WangQ. (2021b). Multilevel political connections and nonprofit revenues under authoritarianism: Evidence from Chinese Foundations. Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12663
54.
WangQ.HeL. (2018). Are the wealthy also healthy? An empirical evaluation of the financial health of Chinese foundations. Chinese Public Administration Review, 9(1), 6–24.
55.
WangZ.GaoJ.LiuY. (2016). Zhongguo shehui zhengce jinbu zhishu baogao [China social policy progress index report]. Social Sciences Academic Press.
56.
WeiQ. (2020). From direct involvement to indirect control? A multilevel analysis of factors influencing Chinese foundations’ capacity for resource mobilization. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31, 762–778.
57.
WiepkingP.HandyF. (2015). Explanations for cross-national differences in philanthropy. In WiepkingP.HandyF. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 9–21). Palgrave Macmillan.
58.
XuY. (2008). Feiduichen xing yilai: Zhongguo jijinhui yu zhengfu guanxi yanjiu [Unsymmetrical dependence: Study on the relationship between foundations and government in China]. Journal of Public Management, 5(1), 33–40.
59.
ZhangJ.MarquisC.QiaoK. (2016). Do political connections buffer firms from or bind firms to the government? A study of corporate charitable donations of Chinese firms. Organization Science, 27(5), 1307–1324.
60.
ZhaoR.WuZ.TaoC. (2016). Understanding service contracting and its impact on NGO development in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(5), 2229–2251.
61.
ZhouH.YeS. (2021). Fundraising in the digital era: Legitimacy, social network, and political ties matter in China. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 498–511.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
