Building on previous literature on corporate behavior, we examine the impact of an nongovernmental organization’s (NGO) foreign status on the moral judgment of its actions in a host country. Individuals in Algeria (N = 450) rated the ethicality of analogous ethical and unethical actions of domestic (Algerian) and foreign NGOs (European). For ethical actions, a foreign NGO was considered less positively than a local NGO for two scenarios out of three. For unethical actions, a foreign NGO was judged more severely in one scenario only. These results suggest that foreign status can influence moral judgment in a way that is consistent with liability-of-foreignness effect predictions. A foreign-sounding denomination can put an NGO at a relative disadvantage compared with its domestic counterpart. Consequently, the denomination choice should be carefully examined.
AhluwaliaR. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments?Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/341576
BanoM. (2008). Contested claims: Public perceptions and the decision to join NGOs in Pakistan. Journal of South Asian Development, 3(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/097317410700300104
4.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2011). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037%2F1089-2680.5.4.323
5.
CampbellJ. T.EdenL.MillerS. R. (2012). Multinationals and corporate social responsibility in host countries: Does distance matter?Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2011.45
6.
CoppockA. (2017). Generalizing from survey experiments conducted on Mechanical Turk: A replication approach. Political Science Research and Methods, 7(3), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10
7.
Dib-SlamaniH.GrolleauG.MzoughiN. (2020). Does a company’s origin matter in moral judgment?Business Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2340944420981597
8.
DupuyK. E.RonJ.PrakashA. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.903854
9.
DupuyK. E.RonJ.PrakashA. (2016). Hands off my regime! Governments’ restrictions on foreign aid to non-governmental organizations in poor and middle-income countries. World Development, 84, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.02.001
10.
EdenL.MillerS. R. (2001). Opening the black box: Multinationals and the costs of doing business abroad. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1(1), C1–C6. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2001.6133200
11.
EdenL.MillerS. R. (2004). Distance matters: Liability of foreignness, institutional distance and ownership strategy. In HittM.ChengJ. (Eds.), Theories of the multinational enterprise: Diversity, complexity and relevance (Advances in international management, 16) (pp. 187–221). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-7929(04)16010-1
12.
EdmanJ. (2016). Reconciling the advantages and liabilities of foreignness: Towards an identity-based framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(1), 674–694. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.29
13.
ElangoB. (2009). Minimizing effects of “liability of foreignness”: Response strategies of foreign firms in the united states. Journal of World Business, 44(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.012
14.
FolkesV. S.KaminsM. A. (1999). Effects of information about firms’ ethical and unethical actions on consumers’ attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0803_03
15.
GeorgeG.CorbishleyC.KhayesiJ. N. O.HaasM. R.TihanyiL. (2016). Bringing Africa in: Promising directions for management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.4002
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relation and group processes. Routledge.
19.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/259266
20.
HsiaY.-J.WhiteL. T.III (2002). Working amid corporatism and confusion: Foreign NGOs in China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764002313002
KhanF. R.WestwoodR.BojeD. M. (2010). I feel like a foreign agent: NGOs and corporate social responsibility interventions into third world child labor. Human Relations, 63(9), 1417–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709359330
24.
KlossekA.LinkeB. M.NippaM. (2012). Chinese enterprises in Germany: Establishment modes and strategies to mitigate the liability of foreignness. Journal of World Business, 47(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.10.018
25.
KohlbergL. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In GoslinD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally.
26.
LewisJ. R. (1993). Multipoint scales: Mean and median differences and observed significance levels. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 5(4), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319309526075
LuoY.MeziasJ. M. (2002). Liabilities of foreignness: Concepts, constructs, and consequences. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00066-2
29.
MaJ.WangS.HaoW. (2012). Does cultural similarity matter? Extending the animosity model from a new perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(5), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211247442
30.
MaranoV.TashmanP.KostovaT. (2016). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 386–408. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.17
31.
MeziasJ. M. (2002). Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: The case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 23(3), 229–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.220
32.
MullinixK. J.LeeperT. J.DruckmanJ. N.FreeseJ. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19
NachumL. (2013). Liability of foreignness. In TeeceD.AugierM.PitelisC. (Eds.), Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 1–4). Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
OssewaardeM.NijhofA.HeyseL. (2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organizing betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.472
36.
PrestonC. C.ColmanA. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
37.
ReichB. J.CampbellT.MadrigalR. (2020). Who deserves faulty products? How blaming the victim prevents consumer punitive action. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1124
SalazarJ. M. (1998). Social identity and national identity. In WorchelS.MoralesJ. F.PáezD.DeschampsJ. C. (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 114–123). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279205.n8
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1985). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
42.
TaussigM. (2017). Foreignness as both a global asset and a local liability: How host country idiosyncrasies and business activities matter. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1), 498–522. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0032-1
43.
ThieuxL. (2009). Le secteur associatif en Algérie: la difficile émergence d’un espace de contestation politique [The associative sector in Algeria: the difficult emergence of a space of political protest]. L’Année du Maghreb [The Year of the Maghreb], 5(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.4000/anneemaghreb.545
Tremblay-BoireJ.PrakashA. (2019). Biased altruism: Islamophobia and donor support for global humanitarian organizations. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13012
46.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
47.
WasifR. (2020). Does the media’s anti-western bias affect its portrayal of NGOs in the Muslim world? Assessing newspapers in Pakistan. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31, 1343–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00242-5
48.
WasifR.PrakashA. (2017). Do government and foreign funding influence individual donations to religious nonprofits? A survey experiment in Pakistan. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(3), 237–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0014
49.
YangY.Revti RamanS. (2016). Dancing with the stars: What do foreign firms get from high-status local partners?Management Decision, 54(6), 1294–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0575
50.
ZaheerS. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/256683
51.
ZhengQ.LuoY.MaksimovV. (2015). Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 50(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
