This article examines the capital structure and debt maturity in nonprofit organizations (NPOs). In particular, we analyze whether these financing decisions are made as expected according to the two main theories used to explain the capital structure, that is, the trade-off and pecking order theories. To do so, we study the associations between NPOs’ indebtedness and their size, age, tangibility, liquidity, profitability, risk, and growth. We use fixed effects, probit, and Heckman selection models with unbalanced panel data containing 8,721 charities in the United Kingdom for the period 2011–2018 (60,222 year-obs). Our results show that the financing patterns of NPOs are consistent with the arguments of the pecking order theory. We also find that less than half of our sample uses long-term debt. Moreover, debt maturity is longer in larger NPOs, those with more tangible assets, or those with higher liquidity.
Andrés-AlonsoP.Garcia-RodriguezI.Romero-MerinoM. E. (2015). The dangers of assessing the financial vulnerability of nonprofits using traditional measures: The case of the nongovernmental development organizations in the United Kingdom. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(4), 371–382.
2.
AngJ. S. (1991). Small business uniqueness and the theory of financial management. Journal of Small Business Finance, 1(1), 1–13.
3.
AntoniouA.GuneyY.PaudyalK. (2006). The determinants of debt maturity structure: Evidence from France, Germany and the UK. European Financial Management, 12(2), 161–194.
4.
AntoniouA.GuneyY.PaudyalK. (2008). The determinants of capital structure: Capital market-oriented versus bank-oriented institutions. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 59–92.
5.
ArellanoM. (2003). Panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press.
6.
BaconP. W. (1992). Do capital structure theories apply to nonprofit hospitals. Journal of the Midwest Finance Association, 21(1), 86–90.
7.
BarclayM. J.MarxL. M.SmithC. W.Jr. (2003). The joint determination of leverage and maturity. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(2), 149–167.
BergerA. N.UdellG. F. (1998). The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6–8), 613–673.
10.
BerrymanJ. (1982). Small business failure and Bankruptcy: A survey of the literature. European Small Business Journal, 1, 47–59.
11.
BowmanH. W. (2002). The uniqueness of nonprofit finance and the decision to borrow. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(3), 293–311.
12.
BowmanH. W.KeatingE.HagerM. (2007). Investment income. In YoungD. R. (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 157–181). AltaMira Press.
13.
BradleyM.JarellG.KimE. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39, 857–878.
14.
CalabreseT. D. (2011). Testing competing capital structure theories of nonprofit organizations. Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(3), 119–143.
15.
CalabreseT. D. (2020). Nonprofit finance: A synthetic review. Voluntaristics Review, 4(5), 1–89.
16.
CalabreseT. D.ElyT. L. (2016). Borrowing for the public good: The growing importance of tax-exempt bonds for public charities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 458–477.
17.
CalabreseT. D.GrizzleC. (2012). Debt, donors, and the decision to give. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Financial Management, 24(2), 221–254.
18.
CastaniasR. (1983). Bankruptcy risk and optimal capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 38(5), 1617–1635.
19.
CharlesC.SloanM. F.ButlerJ. S. (2021). Capital structure determinants for arts nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 31(4), 761–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21454
20.
ChenL. J.ChenS. Y. (2011). How the pecking-order theory explain capital structure. Journal of International Management Studies, 6(3), 92–100.
21.
ChenZ.HarfordJ.KamaraA. (2019). Operating leverage, profitability, and capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 54(1), 369–392.
22.
ChittendenF.HallG.HutchinsonP. (1996). Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: Review of issues and an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 8(1), 59–67.
23.
CoreJ. E.GuayW. R.VerdiR. S. (2006). Agency problems of excess endowment holdings in not-for-profit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 307–333.
24.
D’AmatoA. (2019). Capital structure, debt maturity, and financial crisis: Empirical evidence from SMEs. Small Business Economics, 55(1), 1–23.
DenisonD. V. (2009). Which nonprofit organizations borrow?Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(3), 110–123.
27.
DiamondD. W. (1989). Reputation acquisition in debt markets. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 828–862.
28.
FerriM. G.JonesW. H. (1979). Determinants of financial structure: A new methodological approach. The Journal of Finance, 34(3), 631–644.
29.
FrankM. Z.GoyalV. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important?Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37.
30.
FrydenbergS. (2011). Capital structure theories and empirical tests: An overview. In BakerH. K.MartinG. S. (Eds.), Capital structure and corporate financing decisions: Theory, evidence, and practice (pp. 129–150). Wiley.
31.
Garcia-RodriguezI.JegersM. (2017). Capital structure of nongovernmental development organizations: First cross-country evidence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28(2), 175–194.
32.
HallG. C.HutchinsonP. J.MichaelasN. (2004). Determinants of the capital structures of European SMEs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31(5–6), 711–728.
33.
HutchinsonR. W. (1995). The capital structure and investment decision of the small owner-managed firm: Some exploratory issues. Small Business Economics, 76, 231–239.
34.
IslamS. Z.KhandakerS. (2015). Firm leverage decisions: Does industry matter?The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 31, 94–107.
35.
JegersM. (1997). Portfolio theory and nonprofit financial stability: A comment and extension. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(1), 65–72.
36.
JegersM. (2003). The sustainable growth rate of non–profit organisations: The effect of efficiency, profitability and capital structure. Financial Accountability & Management, 19(4), 309–314.
37.
JegersM. (2011). On the capital structure of non-profit organisations: A replication and extension with Belgian Data. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(1), 18–31.
38.
JegersM.VerschuerenI. (2006). On the capital structure of non-profit organisations: An empirical study for Californian organisations. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(4), 309–329.
39.
JensenM. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow corporate finance takeovers. American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
40.
KallbergJ.ParkinsonK. (1993). Corporate liquidity: Management and measurement. Richard D. Irwin.
41.
KaneA.MarcusA. J.McDonaldR. L. (1985). Debt policy and the rate of return premium to leverage. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20(4), 479–499.
KirchG.TerraP. R. S. (2012). Determinants of corporate debt maturity in South America: Do institutional quality and financial development matter?Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(4), 980–993.
44.
LamM.SearingE.PrenticeC.GrasseN. (2020). Capital structure and financial health. In Garcia-RodriguezI.Romero-MerinoM. E. (Eds.), Financing nonprofit organizations (pp. 145–158). Routledge.
45.
Levine DanielJ.GalassoM. (2019). Revenue embeddedness and competing institutional logics: How nonprofit leaders connect earned revenue to mission and organizational identity. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 84–107.
46.
LewisM. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.
47.
López-GraciaJ.Sogorb-MiraF. (2008). Testing trade-off and pecking order theories financing SMEs. Small Business Economics, 31, 117–136.
48.
MacKayP.PhillipsG. M. (2005). How does industry affect firm financial structure?The Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), 1433–1466.
49.
ManessT. S.ZietlowJ. T. (2005). Short-term financial management. Thomson/South-Western.
50.
MichaelasN.ChittendenF.PoutziousrisP. (1999). Financial policy and capital structure choice in UK SMEs: Empirical evidence from company panel data. Small Business Economics, 12, 113–130.
51.
MitchellG. E.CalabreseT. D. (2019). Proverbs of nonprofit financial management. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(6), 649–661.
52.
ModiglianiF.MillerM. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53, 433–443.
53.
MyersS. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175.
54.
MyersS. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 574–592.
55.
MyersS. C.MajlufN. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 487–221.
56.
MyersS. C.RajanR. G. (1998). The paradox of liquidity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 733–771.
57.
NewtonA. N. (2015). Executive compensation, organizational performance, and governance quality in the absence of owners. Journal of Corporate Finance, 30, 195–222.
58.
OmerT. C.YetmanR. J. (2003). Near zero taxable income reporting by nonprofit organizations. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 25(2), 19–34.
59.
OzkanA. (2001). Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: Evidence from UK company panel data. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 28(1–2), 175–198.
60.
OzkanA. (2002). The determinants of corporate debt maturity: Evidence from UK firms. Applied Financial Economics, 12(1), 19–24.
RosenH. S.SappingtonA. J. (2016). To borrow or not to borrow? An analysis of university leverage decisions. Research in Economics, 70(1), 170–185.
63.
SarkarS. (1999). Illiquidity risk, project characteristics, and the optimal maturity of corporate debt. Journal of Financial Research, 22(3), 353–370.
64.
SheikhN. A.WangZ. (2011). Determinants of capital structure. Managerial Finance, 37(2), 117–133.
65.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1992). Liquidation values and debt capacity: A market equilibrium approach. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1343–1366.
66.
Shyam-SunderL.MyersS. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), 219–244.
67.
SmithG. P. (2010). What are the capital structure determinants for tax-exempt organizations?Financial Review, 45(3), 845–872.
68.
SmithG. P. (2012). Capital structure determinants for tax exempt organisations: Evidence from the UK. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 143–163.
69.
StiglitzJ. E. (1972). Some aspects of the pure theory of corporate finance: Bankruptcies and take-overs. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3(2), 458–482.
70.
StohsM. H.MauerD. C. (1996). The determinants of corporate debt maturity structure. Journal of Business, 69(3), 279–312.
71.
SzymańskaA.Van PuyveldeS.JegersM. (2015). Capital structure of social purpose companies–a panel data analysis. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 234–254.
72.
TitmanS.WesselsR. (1988). The determinants of capital structure choice. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 1–19.
73.
TongG.GreenC. J. (2005). Pecking order or trade-off hypothesis? Evidence on the capital structure of Chinese companies. Applied Economics, 37(19), 2179–2189.
74.
WedigG. J. (1994). Risk, leverage, donations and dividends-in-kind: A theory of nonprofit financial behavior. International Review of Economics & Finance, 3(3), 257–278.
75.
WedigG. J.HassanM.MorriseyM. A. (1996). Tax-exempt debt and the capital structure of nonprofit organizations: An application to hospitals. The Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1247–1283.
76.
WedigG. J.SloanF. A.HassanM.MorriseyM. A. (1988). Capital structure, ownership, and capital payment policy: The case of hospitals. The Journal of Finance, 43(1), 21–40.
77.
WeisbordR. K. (2013). Charitable insolvency and corporate governance in bankruptcy reorganization. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 10, 305–362.
78.
WelchI. (2011). Two common problems in capital structure research: The financial-debt-to-asset ratio and issuing activity versus leverage changes. International Review of Finance, 11, 1–17.
79.
YanW.DenisonD. V.ButlerJ. S. (2009). Revenue structure and nonprofit borrowing. Public Finance Review, 37(1), 47–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
