NPO Web-Based Accountability: How Can We Know If NPOs Are Doing Good Things?

Abstract

This study develops a comprehensive but practical framework for not-for-profit organization (NPO) web-based accountability involving (a) disclosure of operations, financial performance, and social performance, and (b) dialogue; and investigates it in the practices of five Australian NPO award finalists and 160 NPOs more broadly. The findings highlight NPOs’ web-based accountability focused on operational disclosure, promoting NPOs’ activities and mission. However, financial and social performance disclosure was lacking, despite financial performance information being publicly available on the government regulator’s website. Furthermore, the use of online platforms to promote dialogue and exchange was limited. The study suggests that regulatory requirements play an important role in strengthening NPOs’ accountability, and the lack of social performance reporting means it is still unclear what “good things” NPOs are doing.

Keywords

disclosure framework not-for-profit organizations web-based accountability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AbouAssi

Trent

D. L.

(2016). NGO accountability from an NGO perspective: Perceptions, strategies, and practices. Public Administration and Development, 36(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1764

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission. (2020). The annual information statement. https://www.acnc.gov.au/for-charities/annual-information-statement

Anderson

(2009). What NGO accountability means: And does not mean. The American Journal of International Law, 103(1), 170–178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20456745

Andrews

(2014). Downward accountability in unequal alliances: Explaining NGO responses to Zapatista demands. World Development, 54, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.009

Atack

(1999). Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy. World Development, 27(5), 855–864. https://doi.org/S0305-750X(99)00033-9

Baur

Palazzo

(2011). The moral legitimacy of NGOs as partners of corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 579–604.

Bebbington

Brown

Frame

Thomson

(2007). Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570710748544

Benjamin

L. M.

(2013). The potential of outcome measurement for strengthening nonprofits’ accountability to beneficiaries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1224–1244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012454684

Bovens

(2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

10.

Brouard

Glass

(2017). Understanding Information Exchanges and Reporting by Grantmaking Foundations. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 8(2), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjnser.2017v8n2a251

11.

Brown

L. D.

Moore

M. H.

(2001). Accountability, strategy, and international nongovernmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764001303012

12.

Burger

Owens

(2010). Promoting transparency in the NGO sector: Examining the availability and reliability of self-reported data. World Development, 38(9), 1263–1277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.12.018

13.

Connolly

Hyndman

(2013). Charity accountability in the UK: Through the eyes of the donor. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3/4), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-02-2013-0006

14.

Connolly

Hyndman

(2017). The donor–beneficiary charity accountability paradox: A tale of two stakeholders. Public Money & Management, 37(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1281629

15.

Costa

Goulart da Silva

(2019). Nonprofit accountability: The viewpoint of the primary stakeholders. Financial Accountability & Management, 35(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12181

16.

Dash

(2012). Social innovations and institutional challenges in microfinance. In Franz

H.-W.

Hochgerner

Howaldt

(Eds.), Challenge social innovation (pp. 197–213). Springer-Verlag.

17.

Dhanani

Connolly

(2012). Discharging not-for-profit accountability: UK charities and public discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(7), 1140–1169. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247

18.

Dillard

Vinnari

(2019). Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 62, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003

19.

Dumont

G. E.

(2013). Nonprofit virtual accountability: An index and its application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013481285

20.

Durden

(2008). Towards a socially responsible management control system. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(5), 671–694. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513570810872969

21.

Ebrahim

(2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7

22.

Ebrahim

(2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269430

23.

Ebrahim

Rangan

V. K.

(2014). What impact? A framework for measuring the scale and scope of social performance. California Management Review, 56(3), 118–141.

24.

Edwards

Hulme

(1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973. shttps://doi.org/S0305-750X(96)00019-8

25.

Eimhjellen

Wollebæk

Strømsnes

(2014). Associations online: Barriers for using web-based communication in voluntary associations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(3), 730–753. http://ezproxy.newcastle.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.43654954&site=eds-live

26.

Gamble

E. N.

Beer

H. A.

(2017). Spiritually informed not-for-profit performance measurement. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2682-5

27.

Gandia

J. L.

(2011). Internet disclosure by Nonprofit Organizations: Empirical evidence of Nongovernmental Organizations for development in Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 57–78. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/npvolsq40&i=53

28.

Guo

Musso

J. A.

(2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 308–326.

29.

Krippendorff

(2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x

30.

Lee

R. L.

Joseph

R. C.

(2013). An examination of web disclosure and organizational transparency. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 29, 2929, 2218–2224.

31.

Lister

(2003). NGO legitimacy. Critique of Anthropology, 23(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x03023002004

32.

Najam

(1996). NGO accountabiIity: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.1996.tb00112.x

33.

Nazuk

Shabbir

(2018). A new disclosure index for Non-Governmental Organizations. PLoS One, 13(2):e0191337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191337

34.

Nicholls

(2009). “We do good things, don’t we?” “Blended Value Accounting” in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.008

35.

O’Dwyer

Boomsma

(2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: Aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1488

36.

O’Dwyer

Unerman

(2007). From functional to social accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), 446–471. http://gateway.library.qut.edu.au/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/211247926?accountid=13380

37.

O’Dwyer

Unerman

(2010). Enhancing the role of accountability in promoting the rights of beneficiaries of development NGOs. Accounting and Business Research, 40(5), 451–471.

38.

O’Leary

(2017). Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2016.06.002

39.

Ossewaarde

Nijhof

Heyse

(2008). Dynamics of NGO legitimacy: How organising betrays core missions of INGOs. Public Administration and Development, 28(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.472

40.

Roberts

(1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(91)90027-C

41.

Saj

(2013). Managing multiple accountabilities: Balancing outputs, inputs and behaviours to implement strategy in a large Australian charity. Third Sector Review, 19(2), 51–78. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=855367734128144;res=IELAPA

42.

Saxton

G. D.

Guo

(2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1 177/0899764009341086

43.

SIMNA. (2019). 2019 Winners. https://simna.com.au/2019-winners/

44.

Slatten

L. A. D.

Guidry Hollier

B. N.

Stevens

D. P.

Austin

Carson

P. P.

(2016). Web-based accountability in the nonprofit sector: A closer look at arts, culture, and humanities organizations. Journal of Arts Management, Law & Society, 46(5), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2016.1211048

45.

Uddina

M. M.

Belal

A. R.

(2018). Donors’ influence strategies and beneficiary accountability: An NGO case study. Accounting Forum, 12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2018.11.002

46.

van Zyl

Claeyé

. (2019). Up and down, and inside out: Where do we stand on NGO accountability? European Journal of Development Research, 31, 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0170-3

47.

Waters

R. D.

(2007). Nonprofit Organizations’ use of the Internet—A content Analysis of communication trends on the Internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.171

48.

Waters

R. D.

Burnett

Lamm

Lucas

(2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006

49.

Waweru

Spraakman

(2012). The use of performance measures: Case studies from the microfinance sector in Kenya. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 9(1), 44–65.

50.

Yang

Northcott

(2019). Together we measure: Improving public service outcomes via the co-production of performance measurement. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1592906