This article examines a moment of crisis and experimentation in philanthropy from the late 1960s to analyze how race shapes philanthropy. Specifically, it considers two giving circles in Boston launched as a linked funding initiative to address economic and racial inequality: (a) a group of wealthy, White suburbanites who started the Fund for Urban Negro Development to direct donations with “no strings attached” to the other, (b) the Boston Black United Front Foundation, an entity started by Black power activists in the city. Using archival records of the two groups, I analyze their efforts to decouple hierarchies of race and giving in funder–grantee relationships, and connect scholarship on African American history and philanthropy to that on donor control. I frame the notion of “no strings attached” giving as relative and shaped by positioning and identity in ways that produce multiple understandings of the material and abstract “strings” of philanthropy.
BenjaminL. M. (2008). Account space: How accountability requirements shape nonprofit practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 201–223.
6.
Black United Front Foundation. (1970, October19). [Annual Report]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 24, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
7.
Black United Front Foundation. (n.d.). [Candidates]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 24, Folder 4), Boston, MA, United States.
8.
Black United Front Foundation. (n.d.). “Structure of the Foundation.”Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 24, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
9.
Black United Front Foundation. (n.d.). “United Front Foundation.”Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 24, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
10.
Black United Front Foundation Steering Committee. (1969, June2). [Minutes]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 3, Folder 1), Boston, MA, United States.
11.
Boston Black United Front. (1968, April). [Statement of Demands]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 1, Folder 6), Boston, MA, United States.
12.
Boston Black United Front. (1968, July16). [Press Release]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 28, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
13.
Boston Black United Front. (1968, May13). [Meeting on Investment Company, Minutes]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 2, Folder 1), Boston, MA, United States.
14.
Boston Black United Front Steering Committee. (1968, July24). [Minutes]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 2, Folder 7), Boston, MA, United States.
15.
Boston Black United Front Steering Committee. (1970, January26). [Minutes]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 3, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
BrandtnerC.DunningC. (2020). Nonprofits as urban infrastructure. In PowellW. W.BromleyP. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 271–291). Stanford University Press.
18.
BreedenJ. P. (1964–1984). James P. Breeden papers (ML-59) [Rauner special collections]. Dartmouth College.
19.
BrownM. (2018). The moralization of commercialization: Uncovering the history of fee-charging in the U.S. nonprofit human services sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(5), 960–983.
CarboniJ. L.EikenberryA. M. (2021). Do giving circles democratize philanthropy? Donor identity and giving to historically marginalized groups. Voluntas, 32, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00299-2
22.
CarsonE. D. (1989). The evolution of black philanthropy: Patterns of giving and voluntarism. In MagatR. (Ed.), Philanthropic giving: Studies in varieties and goals (pp. 92–102). Oxford University Press.
23.
ChristensenR. A.EbrahimA. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2), 195–209.
24.
ColcloughL. (1971, May27). [Letter to United Front Foundation]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 32, Folder 2), Boston, MA, United States.
25.
ConleyD. (2000). The racial wealth gap: Origins and implication for philanthropy in the African American community. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(4), 530–540.
26.
[Contributions]. (1970-1971). Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 8, Folder: Contributions), Boston, MA, United States.
27.
CooperI. (1970, September22). [Letter to G. Brenton Creelman]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 25, Folder 5), Boston, MA, United States.
DunningC. (2022). Nonprofit neighborhoods: An urban history of inequality and the American state. University of Chicago Press.
34.
EbrahimA. (2002). Information struggles: The role of information in the reproduction of NGO-funder relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 84–114.
35.
EbrahimA. (2003). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for Northern and Southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 191–212.
36.
EdwardsR. M.MorrisL. (1961). The negro in Boston: Action for Boston community development [Government documents]. Boston Public Library.
37.
EikenberryA. M. (2006). Giving circles: Growing grassroots philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 517–532.
38.
FergusonK. (2013). Top down: The Ford Foundation, black power, and the reinvention of racial liberalism. University of Pennsylvania Press.
39.
Finchum-MasonE.HustedK.SuárezD. (2020). Philanthropic foundation responses to covid-19. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1129–1141.
40.
FrancisM. M. (2019). The price of civil rights: Black lives, white funding, and movement capture. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 275–309.
41.
FranciscoD. G.Jr.TangS. (2008). Foundation impact on environmental nongovernmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 603–625.
42.
FreemanT. M. (2020). Madam C.J. Walker’s gospel of giving: Black women’s philanthropy during Jim Crow. University of Illinois Press.
43.
FriedmanL. J. (2002). Philanthropy in America: Historicism and its discontents. In FriedmanL. J.McGarvieM. D. (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy and civility in American history (pp. 1–21). Cambridge University Press.
44.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1968, November1). [Newsletter]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 7), Hanover, NH, United States.
45.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1968, November8). [Newsletter]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 7), Hanover, NH, United States.
46.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1968, October3). [Meeting Minutes]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 47), Hanover, NH, United States.
47.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1969, April25). [Newsletter]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 49), Hanover, NH, United States.
48.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1969, February25). [Newsletter]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 49), Hanover, NH, United States.
49.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1969, September23). [Meeting Minutes]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 7, Folder 5), Boston, MA, United States.
50.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1969, September30). [Financial Report]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 8, Folder 7), Boston, MA, United States.
51.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1970, February). [Newsletter]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 8, Folder 6), Boston, MA, United States.
52.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (1972, June9). [Letter to FUND donors]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 7, Folder 4), Boston, MA, United States.
53.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (n.d.). “The FUND.”Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 53), Hanover, NH, United States.
54.
Fund for Urban Negro Development. (n.d.). [Membership List]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7, Folder 46), Hanover, NH, United States.
55.
GasmanM.DreznerN. D. (2010). Fundraising for black colleges during the 1960s and 1970s: The case of the Hampton Institute. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 321–342.
56.
GoodenS. T.EvansL. L.PerkinsM. L.GoodenC.PangY. (2018). Examining youth outcomes of African American-led nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(Suppl. 4), 34S–54S.
57.
HainesH. H. (1984). Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems, 32(1), 31–43.
HillL. W.RabigJ. (Eds.). (2012). The business of black power: Community development, capitalism, and corporate responsibility in postwar America. University of Rochester Press.
60.
HineD. C. (1990). We specialize in the wholly impossible: The philanthropic work of black women. In McCarthyK. D. (Ed.), Lady bountiful revisited: Women, philanthropy, and power (pp. 70–93). Rutgers University Press.
61.
HorvathA.PowellW. W. (2020). Seeing like a philanthropist: From the business of benevolence to the benevolence of business. In PowellW. W.BromleyP. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 81–122). Stanford University Press.
62.
HuangJ.BuchananP.ButeauE. (2006). In search of impact: Practices and perceptions in foundations’ provision of program and operating grants to nonprofits. The Center for Effective Philanthropy. https://cep.org/in-search-of-impact/
JenkinsD.LeroyJ. (2021). Introduction: The old history of capitalism. In JenkinsD.LeroyJ. (Eds.), Histories of racial capitalism (pp. 1–27). Columbia University Press.
65.
JenkinsJ. C.EckertC. M. (1986). Channeling black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the black movement. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 812–829.
66.
JosephP. (2009). The black power movement: A state of the field. Journal of American History, 96(3), 751–776.
67.
KingM. (1970, May19). [Statement on Black Solidarity Day]. Roxbury Community College Archive (SC1, Box 1, Folder 8), Boston, MA, United States.
68.
KingM. (1981). Chain of change: Struggles for black community development. South End Press.
69.
Kohl-ArenasE. (2015). The self-help myth: How philanthropy fails to alleviate poverty. University of California Press.
70.
LarsenR. S. (1968, October23). [Memo to FUND]. Rauner Library, Dartmouth College (ML-59, Box 7 Folder 45), Hanover, NH, United States.
71.
LeRouxK. (2009). The effects of descriptive representation on nonprofits’ civic intermediary roles: A test of the “racial mismatch” hypothesis in the social services sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(5), 741–760.
72.
LevyJ. (2017). From fiscal triangle to passing through: Rise of the nonprofit corporation. In LamoreauxN. R.NovakW. J. (Eds.), Corporations and American democracy (pp. 213–244). Harvard University Press.
73.
MandevilleJ. (2007). Public policy grant making: Building organizational capacity among nonprofit grantees. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 282–298.
74.
Massachusetts Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1963). Report on Massachusetts: Housing in Boston.
MorrisS. (2002). Organizational innovation in Victorian social housing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(2), 186–206.
77.
NickelsA. E.LeachK. A. (2021). Toward a more just nonprofit sector: Leveraging a critical approach to disrupt and dismantle white masculine space. Public Integrity, 23, 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1870833
78.
O’ConnorA. (1996). Community action, urban reform, and the fight against poverty: The Ford Foundation’s gray areas program. Journal of Urban History, 22(5), 586–625.
79.
O’ConnorA. (2002). Poverty knowledge: Social science, social policy, and the poor in twentieth century U.S. history. Princeton University Press.
80.
OrenstenN.ButeauE. (2020). Foundations respond to crisis: Toward greater flexibility and responsiveness. The Center for Effective Philanthropy. https://cep.org/foundations-respond-to-crisis/
81.
OrleckA.HazirjianL. G. (2011). The War on Poverty: A new grassroots history, 1964-1980. University of Georgia Press.
82.
OstranderS. A. (1995). Money for change: Social movement philanthropy at Haymarket People’s Fund. Temple University Press.
83.
OstranderS. A. (2007). The growth of donor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 356–372.
84.
OstranderS. A.SchervishP. G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as social relation. In Van TilJ. (Ed.), Critical issues in American philanthropy (pp. 67–98). Jossey-Bass.
85.
OstranderS. A.SilverI.McCarthyD. (2004). Mobilizing money strategically: Opportunities for grantees to be active agents in social movement philanthropy. In FaberD. R.McCarthyD. (Eds.), Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and popular movements (pp. 271–289). Rowman & Littlefield.
86.
QuinnR.Tompkins-StangeM.MeyersonD. (2013). Beyond grantmaking: Philanthropic foundations as agents of change and institutional entrepreneurs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 950–968.
87.
RanucciR.LeeH. (2019). Donor influence on long-term innovation within nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 1045–1065.
88.
RayV. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.
89.
ReckhowS. (2012). Follow the money: How foundation dollars change public school politics. Oxford University Press.
90.
ReichR. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton University Press.
91.
RooksN. M. (2006). White money Black power: The surprising history of African American studies and the crisis of race in higher education. Beacon Press.
92.
Roxbury Community College, Special Collections. (2005). Finding aid: Boston Black United Front records (SC1). Roxbury Community College Library.
93.
SandbergB.EikenberryA. M.MirabellaR. M. (2019). Critical perspectives on nonprofit and voluntary organization management; Introduction to the textbook. In EikenberryA. M.MirabellaR. M.SandbergB. (Eds.), Reframing nonprofit organizations: Democracy, inclusion, and social change (pp. 1–11). Melvin & Leigh, Publishers.
94.
SklarK. K. (1999). Women’s history: A field we can lean on. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 513–518.
95.
SnowC.Jr. (1969, January11). Whites give $300,000 to Blacks (pp. 1). The Boston Globe.
96.
SoskisB. (2020). A history of associational life and the nonprofit sector in the United States. In PowellW. W.BromleyP. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 23–80). Stanford University Press.
