In seeking to understand how nonprofits participate in policymaking at the state level, scholars of the third sector tend to overlook or assume a barrier to this activity: collective action problems. I show that such problems suppress charter school participation in their trade associations. An analysis of original survey data and informant interviews combined with Internal Revenue Service data for the complete set of charter membership associations in the United States demonstrates that schools’ participation in these collectives follows a classic pattern of collective action problems: In states where the number of potential members is high, participation rates are lower. Across states, the size of the population of schools eligible for membership better explains variation in participation than other factors typically deemed important by scholars, such as organizational resources and policy environments. The finding supports the argument that large numbers inhibit participation in associations that pursue collective goods for their industry.
AbramsonA. J.McCarthyR. (2012). Infrastructure organizations. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 423–458). Brookings Institution Press.
2.
Almog-BarM.SchmidH. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 11–35.
3.
AndrewsK. T.EdwardsB. (2004). Advocacy organizations in the US political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479–506.
4.
BalassianoK.ChandlerS. M. (2010). The emerging role of nonprofit associations in advocacy and public policy: Trends, issues, and prospects. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 946–955.
5.
BassG. D.DavidF.AronsK. G.MatthewF.CarterS. R. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. Aspen Institute.
6.
BerryJ. M.AronsD. F. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.
7.
BerryJ. M.PortneyK. (2014). The group basis of city politics. In PekkanenR.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 21–46). Johns Hopkins University Press.
8.
BorisE. T.MaronickM. (2012). Civic participation and advocacy. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 394–422). Brookings Institution Press.
9.
BorisE. T.MaronickM.NikolovaM. (2014). Shaping the government-nonprofit partnership: Direct and indirect advocacy. In PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 66–84). Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
BowenD. C.GreeneZ. (2014). Should we measure professionalism with an index? A note on theory and practice in state legislative professionalism research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 14(3), 277–296.
11.
ChenK. K. (2018). Interorganizational advocacy among nonprofit organizations in strategic action fields: Exogenous shocks and local responses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_suppl), 97S–118S.
DonaldsonL. P. (2007). Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies. Journal of Community Practice, 15(3), 139–158.
14.
EsparzaN.WalkerE. T.RossmanG. (2014). Trade associations and the legitimation of entrepreneurial movements: Collective action in the emerging gourmet food truck industry. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 143S–162S.
15.
FyallR.McGuireM. (2015). Advocating for policy change in nonprofit coalitions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(6), 1274–1291.
16.
GodwinR. K.AinsworthS. H.GodwinE. (2013). Lobbying and policymaking. CQ Press.
17.
GuoC.SaxtonG. D. (2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1(1), Article 5.
18.
HagerM. A. (2014). Engagement motivations in professional associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 39S–60S.
19.
HojnackiM. (1997). Interest groups’ decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 61–87.
20.
KingdonJ. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Longman.
21.
LerouxK.GoerdelH. T. (2009). Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 514–536.
22.
LiH.LoC. W.TangS. (2017). Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 103–117.
23.
LoweryD.GrayV.AndersonJ.NewmarkA. J. (2004). Collective action and the mobilization of institutions. The Journal of Politics, 66(3), 684–705.
24.
MacIndoeH.BeatonE. (2019). Friends or foes? How managerial perceptions of the political opportunity structure shape nonprofit advocacy. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(1), 59–89.
25.
MasonD. P. (2016). Common agency in nonprofit advocacy organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(1), 11–26.
26.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
27.
McNuttP. (1999). Public goods and club goods. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1, 927–951.
28.
MosleyJ. E. (2010). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review, 84(1), 57–76.
29.
MosleyJ. E. (2011). Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: What tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 435–457.
30.
MosleyJ. E. (2012). Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 841–866.
31.
MosleyJ. E. (2013). Recognizing new opportunities: Reconceptualizing policy advocacy in everyday organizational practice. Social Work, 58(3), 231–239.
32.
MosleyJ. E. (2014). From skid row to the statehouse: How nonprofit homeless service providers overcome barriers to policy advocacy involvement. In PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 107–134). Johns Hopkins University Press.
33.
Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2011). Nonprofit organizations, bureaucratic agencies, and policy: Exploring the determinants of administrative advocacy. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(1), 61–74.
34.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
35.
ReitanT. C. (1998). Theories of interorganizational relations in the human services. Social Service Review, 72(3), 285–309.
36.
SalamonL. M.GellerS. L.LorentzS. C. (2008). Nonprofit America: A force for democracy?Johns Hopkins University, Center for Civil Society Studies.
37.
SandfortJ. (2014). Analyzing the practice of nonprofit advocacy: Comparing two human services networks. In PekkanenR. J.SmithS. R.TsujinakaY. (Eds.), Nonprofits and advocacy: Engaging community and government in an era of retrenchment (pp. 222–253). Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
SchmidH.BarM.NirelR. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations: Implications for policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 581–602.
39.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire. Harvard University Press.
40.
TschirhartM. (2006). Nonprofit membership associations. In SteinbergW. P.PowelR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 523–541). Yale University Press.
41.
TschirhartM. (2010). Self-regulation at the state level: Nonprofit membership associations and club emergence. In GugertyM. K.PrakashA. (Eds.), Voluntary regulation of NGOs and nonprofits: An accountability club framework (pp. 85–98). Cambridge University Press.
42.
WalkerJ. L. (1991). Mobilizing interest groups in America: Patrons, professions, and social movements. University of Michigan Press.
43.
WilsonJ. Q. (1995). Political organizations. Princeton University Press.
44.
YoungD. R. (2010). Nonprofit infrastructure associations as reluctant clubs. In GugertyM. K.PrakashA. (Eds.), Voluntary regulation of NGOs and nonprofits: An accountability club framework (pp. 85–98). Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
