Do donors seek out potentially adverse information about organizations making fundraising appeals? Do they react when it is readily available? Do they draw negative inferences when critical information is not available? To answer these questions, we consider previously unexamined large-scale natural experiments involving U.S. charitable organizations—tax-exempt organizations that file Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990. Using standard difference-in-differences designs, we find that donors penalize organizations with high fundraising costs when there is mandatory disclosure or involuntary disclosure by a third-party reporter. Organizations with lower fundraising costs fundraise more successfully in the presence of these disclosures. The contrast with donors’ behavior when such information is not available suggests that donors do not draw correct inferences when potentially consequential information is not disclosed. Disclose-on-request requirements, in contrast, apparently do not have any significant impact on donors’ or organizations’ behavior. We then sketch implications for the regulation of donations to charities and their modern cousins, such as crowdfunding and social enterprise organizations.
AndreoniJ. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.
2.
AndreoniJ.PayneA. A. (2011). Is crowding out due entirely to fundraising? Evidence from a panel of charities. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.011
3.
BarberP. (2012). Regulation of US charitable solicitations since 1954. Voluntas, 23(3), 737–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl
4.
BarberP. (2013). The official word: What state charities webpages tell the public [2013 Columbia Law School Charities Regulation and Oversight Project Policy Conference on “The Future of State Charities Regulation,” pp. 1–18]. https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8348H9M
5.
BarberP. (2017). Muddy waters: Cross currents in fundraising and its control—1907-1954. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(3), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2017-0007
6.
BarberP.FarwellM. M. (2016). Charitable solicitations regulation and the principles of regulatory disclosure. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 7(3), 311–338. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2015-0017
7.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
8.
Ben-ShaharO.SchneiderC. E. (2014). More than you wanted to know: The failure of Mandated Disclosure. Princeton University Press.
9.
BoegerN. (2018). Shaping corporate reform: Social enterprise, cooperatives, and mission-led and employee-owned businesses. In MeansB.YockeyJ. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of social enterprise law (pp. 123–141). Cambridge University Press.
10.
BoudreauK.JeppesenL. B.ReichsteinT.RullaniF. (2018). Entrepreneurial crowdfunding without private claims. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2669545
11.
BowmanW. (2006). Should donors care about overhead costs? Do they care?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006287219
CascinoS.CorreiaM.TamayoA. (2019). Does consumer protection enhance disclosure credibility in reward crowdfunding?Journal of Accounting Research, 57(5), 1247–1302. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12289
14.
CastanedaM. A.GarenJ.ThorntonJ. (2008). Competition, contractibility, and the market for donors to nonprofits. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 24(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm036
CollinsJ. M. (2011). Improving financial literacy: The role of nonprofit providers. In MitchellO. S.LusardiA. (Eds.), Financial literacy: Implications for retirement security and the financial marketplace (pp. 268–287). Oxford University Press.
ConnollyC.HyndmanN.McConvilleD. (2013). Conversion ratios, efficiency and obfuscation: A study of the impact of changed UK charity accounting requirements on external stakeholders. Voluntas, 24, 785–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9371-8
20.
DranoveD.JinG. Z. (2010). Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(4), 935–963. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.4.935
21.
EasterbrookF. H.FischelD. R. (1984). Mandatory disclosure and the protection of investors. Virginia Law Review, 70(4), 669–716.
22.
EckerdA. (2015). Two approaches to nonprofit financial ratios and the implications for managerial incentives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013518845
23.
FishmanM. J.HagertyK. M. (2003). Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure in markets with informed and uninformed customers. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 19(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/19.1.45
24.
FungA.GrahamM.WeilD. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge University Press.
GalleB. (2019). Self-regulation of social enterprise. In MeansB.YockeyJ. W. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social enterprise law (pp. 26–42). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316890714.003.
27.
GalleB.WalkerD. I. (2016). Donor reaction to salient disclosures of nonprofit executive pay: A regression-discontinuity approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015609728
28.
GilsonR. J.KraakmanR. H. (1984). The mechanisms of market efficiency. Virginia Law Review, 70(4), 549–644.
29.
GilsonR. J.KraakmanR. H. (2014). Market efficiency after the financial crisis: It’s still a matter of information costs. Virginia Law Review, 100(2), 313–375.
GlücklerJ.RiesM. (2012). Why being there is not enough: Organized proximity in place-based philanthropy. Service Industries Journal, 32(4), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2011.596534
32.
GolmanR.HagmannD.LoewensteinG. (2017). Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), 96–135. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151245
GordonT. P.KnockC. L.NeelyD. G. (2009). The role of rating agencies in the market for charitable contributions: An empirical test. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(6), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.08.001
35.
GrizzleC. (2015). Efficiency, stability, and the decision to give to nonprofit arts and cultural organizations in the United States. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20, 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm
36.
GrossmanS. J. (1981). The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. The Journal of Law & Economics, 24(3), 461–483.
37.
GugertyM. K.PrakashA. (2010). Voluntary regulation of NGOs and nonprofits: An accountability club framework (GugertyM. K.PrakashA., Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
38.
HagerM. A.PollakT.WingK.RooneyP. M. (2004). The quality of financial reporting by nonprofits: Findings and implications. In Nonprofit overhead cost project: Facts and perspectives (No. 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888944
39.
HailL.LeuzC.WysockiP. (2010). Global accounting convergence and the potential adoption of IFRS by the U.S. (Part I): Conceptual underpinnings and economic analysis. Accounting Horizons, 24(3), 355–394. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2010.24.3.355
HofmannM. A.McSwainD. (2013). Financial disclosure management in the nonprofit sector: A framework for past and future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 32(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2013.10.003
45.
Hope Consulting. (2010). Money for good: The US market for impact investments and charitable gifts from individual donors and investors. http://www.cambercollective.com/moneyforgood
46.
HopkinsB. (1980). Charity under siege: Government regulation of fundraising. John Wiley.
KeatingE. K.ParsonsL. M.RobertsA. A. (2008). Misreporting fundraising: How do nonprofit organizations account for telemarketing campaigns?The Accounting Review, 83(2), 417–446.
49.
KhumawalaS. B.ParsonsL. M.GordonT. P. (2005). TRACKS: Assessing the quality of not-for-profit efficiency ratios: Do donors use joint cost allocation disclosures?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(3), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0502000305
KrishnanR.YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2006). Expense misreporting in nonprofit organizations. The Accounting Review, 81(2), 399–420.
53.
LeuzC.WysockiP. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12115
MarudasN. P.HahnT.JacobsF. A. (2012). An improved model of donations to nonprofit organizations. Proceedings of ASBBS, 19(1), 545–560.
56.
MetzgerL.GüntherI. (2019). Making an impact? The relevance of information on aid effectiveness for charitable giving. A laboratory experiment. Journal of Development Economics, 136, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.015
57.
MilgromP. R. (1981). Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. The Bell Journal of Economics, 12(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003562
ParsonsL. M. (2003). Is accounting information from nonprofit organizations useful to donors? A review of charitable giving and value-relevance. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 104–129.
61.
PengS.KimM.DeatF. (2019). The effects of nonprofit reputation on charitable giving: A survey experiment. Voluntas, 30(4), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00130-7
62.
PortilloJ. E.StinnJ. (2018). Overhead aversion: Do some types of overhead matter more than others?Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 72, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.11.003
63.
PosnettJ.SandlerT. (1989). Demand for charity donations in private non-profit markets: The case of the U.K. Journal of Public Economics, 40, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.018
64.
QuH.Levine DanielJ. (2020). Is ‘Overhead’ a tainted word? A survey experiment exploring framing effects of nonprofit overhead on donor decision, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020959475
ReiserD. B.DeanS. A. (2017). Social enterprise law: Trust, public benefit and capital markets. Oxford University Press.
67.
Riley v. National Federation of the Blind, 487 US 781, 799 (1988).
68.
SavaryJ.LiC. X.NewmanG. E. (2020). Exalted purchases or tainted donations? Self-signaling and the evaluation of charitable incentives, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30, 671–679.
69.
SaxtonG. D.NeelyD. G.GuoC. (2014). Web disclosure and the market for charitable contributions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.003
70.
SimonH. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19.
71.
SteinbergR. (1988). Economic perspectives on regulation of charitable solicitation. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 39, 775–797.
72.
SteinbergR. (1997). On the regulation of fund raising. In D. F. Burlingame (Ed.), Critical issues in fund raising (pp. 234–244). Jossey-Bass.
73.
SteinbergR.MorrisD. (2010). Ratio discrimination in charity fundraising: The inappropriate use of cost ratios has harmful side-effects. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701737481
TinkelmanD. (2006). The decision-usefulness of nonprofit fundraising ratios: Some contrary evidence. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 21(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0602100406
76.
TinkelmanD.MankaneyK. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006293176
77.
TinkelmanD.NeelyD. G. (2011). Some econometric issues in studying nonprofit revenue interactions using NCCS data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010371010
78.
TrusselJ. M.ParsonsL. M. (2007). Financial reporting factors affecting donations to charitable organizations. Advances in Accounting, 23(07), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6110(07)23010-X
79.
YablonC. M. (2018). Mixed-motive investments and agency costs. In MeansB.YockeyJ. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of social enterprise law (pp. 384–400). Cambride University Press.
80.
YetmanM. H.YetmanR. J. (2013). How does the incentive effect of the charitable deduction vary across charities?Accounting Review, 88(3), 1069–1094. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50370
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
