Analyzing mission statements from 1,420 community foundations, this research aims to determine whether community foundations portray themselves as primarily transactional or transformational in their leadership style. Results indicate that approximately half of the community foundations present themselves as transformational dominant although about a third demonstrate transactional dominance. The well-established leadership categories of transformational and transactional (a) give us a new way to explore community foundations’ roles in their communities, (b) help us better understand the way community foundations perceive themselves and their leadership, and (c) provide a mechanism to assess how community foundations are presenting their missions to their communities. In addition, by examining organizations as the unit of analysis, this research answers long-standing calls in leadership studies to consider levels of analysis beyond the individual.
AlegreI.Berbegal-MirabentJ.GuerreroA.Mas-MachuraM. (2018). The real mission of the mission statement: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management and Organisation, 24(4), 456–473.
2.
AntonakisJ. (2012). Transformational and charismatic leadership. In DayD. V.AntonakisJ. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 256–288). SAGE.
3.
AntonakisJ.BastardozN.JacquartP.ShamirB. (2016). Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 293–319.
4.
AntonakisJ.HouseR. J. (2013). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. In AvolioJ.YammarinoJ. (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead 10th anniversary edition (pp. 3–33). Emerald.
5.
AvolioB. J. (2004). Examining the full range model of leadership: Looking back to transform forward. In DayD. V.ZaccaroS.HalpinS. (Eds.), Leader development for transforming organizations (pp. 91–118). Psychology Press.
6.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (1991). The full range of leadership development: Basic and advanced manuals. Bass, Avolio.
7.
AvolioB. J.BassB. M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of Leadership: Cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
8.
BarryC. A. (1998). Choosing qualitative data analysis software: Atlas/ti and Nudist compared. Sociological Research Online, 3(3), 1–13.
9.
BartC. K. (1997). Industrial firms and the power of mission. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(4), 371–383.
10.
BartC. K.BaetzM. C. (1998). The relationship between mission statements and firm performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 823–853.
11.
BartkusB. R.GlassmanM. (2008). Do firms practice what they preach? The relationship between mission statements and stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 207–216.
BassB. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
14.
BassB. (1996). Is there universality in the full range model of leadership?International Journal of Public Administration, 19(6), 731–761.
15.
BassB. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
BassB.RiggioR. (2006). Transformational leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
BerlanD. (2018). Understanding nonprofit missions as dynamic and interpretative conceptions. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 28 (3), 413–422.
18.
BerryF. S.BerryW. D. (2014). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In SabatierP. A.WeibleC. M. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 307–359). Westview Press.
19.
BesanaA.EspositoA.TreuM. (2018). The philanthropy tree of community foundations from ancient to contemporary times. Roots and branches of US and Italian foundations: International Conference on Applied Economics 2018. In TsounisN.VlachveiA.(Eds.), Advances in time series data methods in applied economic research (pp. 103–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02194-8_8
20.
BryceH. J. (2000). Financial and strategic management for nonprofit organizations. Jossey-Bass.
21.
BurnsJ. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
22.
ButeauE.ChaffinM.BuchananP. (2014). What donors value: How community foundations can increase donor satisfaction, referrals, and future giving. The Center for Effectiv Philanthropy.
23.
CaldwellC.HayesL. A.BernalP.KarriR. (2008.). Ethical stewardship—Implications for leadership and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 153–164.
24.
ChandraY.JiangL. C.WangC.-J. (2016). Mining social entrepreneurship strategies using topic modeling. PLOS ONE, 11(3), Article e0151342.
DalyS. (2008). Institutional innovation in philanthropy: Community foundations in the UK. Voluntas, 19, 219–241.
28.
DansereauF.AluttoJ.YammarinoF. (1984). Theory testing in organizational behavior: The variant approach. Prentice Hall.
29.
DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D.DonaldsonL. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.
30.
DembA.ChouetD.LossiusT.NeubauerF. (1989). Defining the role of board. Long Range Planning, 22(1), 61–68.
31.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
32.
Duan-BarnettN.WangelinJ.LammH. (2012). Models of social change: Community foundations and agenda setting. Foundation Review, 4(4), 83–97.
33.
EasterlingD. (2008). The leadership role of community foundations in building social capital. National Civic Review, 97, 39–51.
34.
FeurtS. L.SacksE. W. (2000). An international perspective on the history, development and characteristics of community foundations. In WalkenhorstP. (Ed.), Building philanthropic and social capital: The work of community foundations (pp. 15–39). Bertelsman Foundation.
35.
FreemanR. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
FyallR.MooreM. K.GugertyM. K. (2018). Beyond NTEE codes: Opportunities to understand nonprofit activity through mission statement content coding. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 677–701.
38.
GermainR.CooperM. B. (1990). How a customer mission statement affects company performance. Industrial Marketing & Management, 19(1), 47–54.
39.
GraddyE.WangL. (2009). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(3), 392–412.
40.
GraddyE. A.MorganD. L. (2006). Community foundations, organizational strategy, and public policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 605–630.
41.
GuoC.BrownW. A. (2006). Community foundation performance: Bridging community resources and needs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 267–287.
42.
GuoC.LaiW. (2019). Community foundations in China: In search of identity?VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30, 647–663.
43.
HamiltonR.ParzenJ.BrownP. (2004). Community change makers: The leadership roles of community foundations. Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
44.
HarrowJ.JungT.PhillipsS. D. (2016). Community foundations: Agility in the duality of foundation and community. In JungT.PhillipsS. D.HarrowJ. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to philanthropy (pp. 308–321). Routledge.
45.
HofstedeG.HofsedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
46.
HoloskoM. J.WinkelM.CrandallC.BriggsH. (2015). A content analysis of mission statements of our top 50 schools of social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 51, 222–236.
47.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organization: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. SAGE.
48.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.BroL. L.BøllingtoftA.EriksenT. L. M.HoltenA.-L.WürtzA. (2019). Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership. Administration & Society, 51(1), 3–33.
49.
JudgeT. A.PiccoloR. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.
50.
JungT.HarrowJ.PhillipsS. (2013). Developing a better understanding of community foundations in the UK’s localisms. Policy & Politics, 41(3), 409–427.
51.
KirkG.NolanS. (2010). Nonprofit mission statement focus and financial performance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(4), 473–490.
52.
KleinK.DansereauF.HallR. (1994). Level issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195–229.
53.
KlemmM.SandersonS.LuffmanG. (1991). Mission statements: Selling corporate values to employees. Long Range Planning, 24(3), 73–78.
54.
KnightB. (2014). Dimensions of the field: An in-depth analysis of the community foundation movement. Community Foundation Atlas. https://communityfoundationatlas.org/
55.
KnippenbergD.SitkinS. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—Transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1–60.
56.
KochB. J.GalaskiewiczJ.PiersonA. (2015). The effect of networks on organizational missions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 510–538.
57.
KrippendorffK. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). SAGE.
58.
LeonardJ. (1989). Creating community capital: Birth and growth of community foundations. In MagatR. (Ed.), An agile servant: Community leadership by community foundations (pp. 89–90). The Council on Foundations.
59.
LinY. H. (2012). Knowledge brokering for transference to the pilot’s safety behavior. Management Decision, 50(7), 1326–1338.
60.
LordR.DinhJ. (2012). Aggregation processes and levels of analysis as organizing structures for leadership theory. In DayD. V.AntonakisJ. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 29–65). SAGE.
61.
LoweJ. (2004). Community foundations: What do they offer community development?Journal of Urban Affairs, 26(2), 221–240.
62.
LoweK. B.KroeckK. G.SivasubramaniamN. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–425.
63.
MillesenE. C.Martin. (2014). Community foundation strategy: Doing good and the moderating effects of fear, tradition, and serendipity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 832–849.
64.
MinkoffD.PowellW. (2006). Nonprofit mission: Constancy, responsiveness, or deflection? In PowellW.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 591–611). Yale University Press.
65.
PalmerT. B.ShortJ. C. (2008). Mission statements in U.S. Colleges of Business: An empirical examination of their content with linkages to configurations and performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(4), 454–470.
66.
PandeyS.KimM.PandeyS. K. (2017). Do mission statements matter for nonprofit performance? Insights from a study of US performing arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(3), 389–410.
67.
PearceJ.A.DavidF. (1987). Corporate mission statements: The bottom line. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(2), 109–115.
68.
PhillipsS.BirdI.CarltonL.RoseL. (2016). Knowledge as leadership, belonging as community: How Canadian community foundations are using vital signs for social change. The Foundation Review, 8(3), Article 8.
69.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.BommerW. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Management, 22(2), 259–298.
70.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.MoormanR. H.FetterR. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107–142.
71.
RichardsL.RichardsT. (1994). From filing cabinet to computer. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 146–172). Routledge.
72.
RousseauD. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 1–37). JAI Press.
73.
RowoldJ. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Extending the transformational-transactional leadership paradigm. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 283(3), 367–390.
74.
SalamonL. M.SokolowskiS. W.AnheierH. K. (2000). Social origins of civil society: An overview (Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project No. 38]. The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
75.
ShortJ. C.BrobergJ. C.CogliserC. C.BrighamK. H. (2010). Construct validation using Computer-Aided Text Analysis (CATA): An illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 320–347.
76.
SuárezD. F.HustedK.CasasA. (2019). Community foundations as advocates: Social change discourse in the philanthropic sector. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 7(3), 206–232.
77.
WangG.OhI.CourtrightS.ColbertA. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 223–270.
78.
WangL.GraddyE.MorganD. (2011). The development of community-based foundations in East Asia. Public Management Review, 13(8), 1155–1178.
79.
WilkersonE. A.CrystalC. A. (2018). A content analysis of mission statements in nonprofit education. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 8(1), 80–92.
80.
WolfeR. E. (2006). Community foundations as agents of local social change. ProQuest.
81.
YoungD. R.CaseyJ. (2016). Supplementary, complementary, or adversarial? In BorisE. T.SteuerleC. E. (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 37–70). Urban Institute Press.
