What predicts the formation and evolution of partnerships in unstable institutional contexts? We answer this question by examining the partnership field of environmental nonprofit organizations based in Lebanon. Employing descriptive and inferential network methods, we find organizational attributes such as scope, operations, and age to be significant predictors of partnership formation. In particular, organizations working in the same issue areas are more likely to partner with each other; age and scope complementarity also drives the partnership formation over time. Furthermore, the results reveal that organizations are more likely to form partnerships with their partners’ partners, and consequently stable clusters or subgroups emerge over time. These findings are suggestive but are the first to provide a multilevel analysis of nonprofit partnership formation and evolution.
AbouAssiK. (2013). Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors NGO response to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 584–602.
2.
AbouAssiK.BiesA. (2018). Relationships and resources of NGOs: Coercive, normative, and mimetic isomorphism in shaping NGO self-regulation. Public Management Review, 20(11), 1581–1601.
3.
AbouAssiK.BowmanA. O. (2018). Toward a conditional analysis of NGO-local government relations in developing countries. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1, 222–235.
4.
AbouAssiK.JoS. (2015). Partnerships among Lebanese nonprofit organizations: Assessing the impact on human resource capacity. American Review of Public Administration, 47(6), 687–698.
5.
AbouAssiK.TschirhartM. (2018). Organizational response to changing demands: Predicting behavior in donor networks. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 126–136.
6.
AgranoffR.McGuireM. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press.
7.
AhujaG.SodaG.ZaheerA. (2011). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–444.
8.
ÅkerstrømA. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of possibilities. The Policy Press.
9.
AllenB.LippnerG.ChenY.-T.FotouhiB.MomeniN.YauS.-T.NowakM. A. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure. Nature, 544(7649), 227–230.
10.
AnsellC.GashY. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
11.
AshmanD. (2001). Strengthening North-South partnerships for sustainable development. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 74–98.
12.
AtoubaY.ShumateM. (2015). International nonprofit collaboration: Examining the role of homophily. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 587–608.
13.
AustinJ.SeitanidiM. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part 2. Partnership processes and outcomes. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.
14.
BabiakK.ThibaultL. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117–143.
15.
BanksN.HulmeD.EdwardsM. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort?World Development, 66, 707–718.
16.
BorgattiS. P. (2006). Identifying sets of key players in a social network. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 12(1), 21–34.
17.
BrinkerhoffD. W.WetterbergA. (2016). Gauging the effects of social accountability on services, governance, and citizen empowerment. Public Administration Review, 76(2), 274–286.
18.
BrinkerhoffJ. M. (2002). Partnership for international development: Rhetoric or results?Lynne Rienner.
19.
BungerA. C. (2013). Administrative coordination in non-profit human service delivery networks: The role of competition and trust. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1155–1175.
20.
BungerA. C.HuangK. (2019). Change in collaborative ties in a children’s mental health services network: A clique perspective. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance43(2), 74–91.
21.
DianiM. (2002). Network analysis. In KlandermansB.StaggenborgS. (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 173–200). University of Minnesota Press.
22.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
23.
DomanńskiJ. (2012). Competitiveness of nongovernmental organizations in developing countries: Evidence from Poland. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 100–119.
24.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
25.
GazleyB.GuoC. (2020). What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A systematic review of the literature. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 31(2): 211–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21433
26.
GraddyE.ChenB. (2009). Partner selection and the effectiveness of interorganizational collaborations. In O’LearyR.BinghamL. B. (Eds.), The collaborative public manager: New ideas for the twenty-first century (pp. 53–70). Georgetown University Press.
27.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
28.
GuoC.AcarM. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency institutional and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 340–361.
29.
HaddadT. (2017). Analysing state–civil society associations relationship: The case of Lebanon. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(4), 1742–1761.
HerroldC. (2018). A conceptual model of foundations’ leadership capacity in times of change: Lessons from Egypt. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 286–303.
32.
HillmannH.AvenB. L. (2011). Fragmented networks and entrepreneurship in late imperial Russia. American Journal of Sociology, 117(2), 484–538.
33.
HuangK. (2014). Knowledge sharing in a third-party governed health and human services network. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 587–598.
34.
KenisP.ProvanK. G. (2009). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456.
35.
KochD. J.DreherA.NunnenkampP.ThieleR. (2009). Keeping a low profile: What determines the allocation of aid by non-governmental organizations?World Development, 37(5), 902–918.
36.
KokaB. R.MadhavanR.PrescottJ. E. (2006). The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 721–737.
KrivitskyP. N.HandcockM. S. (2010). A separable model for dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology), 76(1), 29–46.
39.
LiH.TangS.-Y.LoC. W.-H. (2018). The institutional antecedents of managerial networking in Chinese environmental NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(2), 325–346.
40.
McAdamD.ScottW. R. (2005). “Organizations and movements”. In DavisG. F.McAdamD.ScottW. R.ZaldM. N. (eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4–40). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
McCarthyD. (2004). Environmental justice grantmaking: Elites and activists collaborate to transform philanthropy. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 250–270.
42.
MilwardH. B.ProvanK. G.FishA.IsettK. R.HuangK. (2010). Governance and collaboration: An evolutionary study of two mental health networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, i125–i141.
43.
NowakM. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563.
44.
NowellB.SteelmanT. (2015). Communication under fire: The role of embeddedness in the emergence and efficacy of disaster response communication networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 929–952.
45.
O’learyR.VijN. (2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going?The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 507–522.
46.
PilnyA.AtoubaY. (2018). Modeling valued organizational communication networks using exponential random graph models. Management Communication Quarterly, 32(2), 250–264.
47.
PodolnyJ. M. (2005). Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton University Press.
48.
ProvanK. G.FishA.SydowJ. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.
49.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.
50.
ProvanK. G.LemaireR. H. (2012). Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 638–648.
51.
QianH.HuangK.ChenB. (2020). Professional friendship, resource competition, and collaboration in a homeless service delivery network. Human Service Organization: Management, Leadership, & Governance, 44, 110–126.
52.
RobinsG.PattisonP.KalishY.LusherD. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191.
53.
SeldenS. C.SowaJ.SandfortJ. (2006). The impact of nonprofit collaboration in early child care and education on management and program outcomes. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 412–425.
54.
ShahR. H.SwaminathanV. (2008). Factor influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 471–494.
55.
SharpZ. (2018). Existential angst and identity rethink: The complexities of competition for the nonprofit. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4), 767–788.
56.
ShumateM.PalazzoloE. T. (2010). Exponential random graph (p*) models as a method for social network analysis in communication research. Communication Methods and Measures, 4(4), 341–371.
57.
SnijdersT. A.PattisonP. E.RobinsG. L.HandcockM. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153.
58.
StilesK. W. (2002). Civil society by design: Donors, NGOs, and the intermestic development circle in Bangladesh. Greenwood Publishing Group.
59.
ValenteT. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
60.
WangR.TanjasiriS. P.PalmerP.ValenteT. V. (2016). Network structure, multiplexity, and evolution as influences on community-based participatory interventions. Journal of Community Psychology, 44(6), 781–798.
61.
WattsD. J.StrogatzS. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature393(6684), 440–442.
62.
ZeimersG.AnagnostopoulosC.ZintzT.WillemA. (2019). Examining collaboration among nonprofit organizations for social responsibility programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(5), 953–974.
