In the early 1970s, scholars studying a variety of service organizations realized that beneficiaries were not only external stakeholders who received services but they were also important organizational actors whose participation in the organization affected the organization’s structure, functioning, and outcomes. Tracing these early observations, and the related concepts of coproduction, value cocreation, and partial membership, this article considers why these ideas have not been more central to nonprofit education and research. After offering likely explanations, the article reports results from a systematic literature review in three nonprofit journals. The results show that despite the limited attention to these ideas, research findings reveal that beneficiaries are important organizational actors, whose participation in the nonprofit matters for the work of staff, leaders, and ultimately for social impact. The article concludes with suggestions for bringing beneficiaries more centrally into nonprofit management research and education.
AlfordJ. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Springer.
2.
AlfordJ.FreijserL. (2018). Public management and co-production. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 40–48). Routledge.
3.
AshcraftR. F. (Ed.). (2007). Benchmark 3: The third decennial conference on nonprofit and philanthropic studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 5S–10S.
4.
BenjaminL. M. (2018). Client authority in nonprofit human service organizations. In CnaanR. A.MilofskyC. (Eds.), Handbook of community movements and local organizations in the 21st century (pp. 141–154). Springer.
5.
BenjaminL. M.CampbellD. C. (2015). Nonprofit performance: Accounting for the agency of clients. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(5), 988–1006.
6.
BerensM. J. (2017). A review of research: Designing the built environment for recovery from homelessness. Design Resources for Homelessness.
7.
BerryL. L.ParasuramanA. (1993). Building a new academic field: The case of services marketing. Journal of Retailing, 69(1), 13–60.
8.
BonellC.HiltonM. (2002). Consumerism in health care: The case of a U.K. voluntary sector HIV prevention organization. Voluntas, 13(1), 27–46.
9.
BordtR. L. (1997). The Structure of Women’s Nonprofit Organizations. Indiana University Press.
10.
BovairdT.LoefflerE. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23(4), 1119–1138.
11.
BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (2018). Co-production and co-creation: Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.
12.
BrudneyJ. L. (1984). Local coproduction of services and the analysis of municipal productivity. Urban Affairs Review, 19(4), 465–484.
13.
BrudneyJ. L.EnglandR. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43, 59–65.
14.
BrudneyJ. L.KluesnerT. M. (1992). Researchers and practitioners in nonprofit organization and voluntary action: Applying research to practice?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 293–308.
15.
BrudneyJ. L.StringerG. E. (1998). Higher education in volunteer administration: Exploring—and critiquing—the state of the art. In O’NeillM.FletcherK. (Eds.), Nonprofit management education: US and world perspectives (pp. 95–109). Greenwood/Praeger.
16.
BurlingameD.HammackD. C. (2005). Education for a civil society: A summary of the 2004 conference. Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
17.
BushouseB. K.NeverB.ChristensenR. K. (2016). Elinor Ostrom’s contribution to nonprofit and voluntary action studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 7S–26S.
18.
CarminJ.JehličkaP. (2005). By the masses or for the masses? The transformation of voluntary action in the Czech Union for Nature Protection. Voluntas, 16(4), 397–416.
19.
CarnochanS.SamplesM.MyersM.AustinM. J. (2014). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 1014–1032.
20.
ChenK. K. (2009). Enabling creative chaos: The organization behind the burning man event. University of Chicago Press.
21.
ChetkovichC. A.KunreutherF. (2006). From the ground up: Grassroots organizations making social change. Cornell University Press.
22.
CookJ. B. (1988). Managing nonprofits of different sizes. In O’NeillM.YoungD. R. (Eds.), Educating managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 101–116). Praeger.
23.
CooneyK. (2006). The institutional and technical structuring of nonprofit ventures: Case study of a U.S. hybrid organization caught between two fields. Voluntas, 17(2), 137–155.
24.
DarlingR. B. (2000). The partnership model in human services: Sociological foundations and practices. Springer.
25.
DiMaggioP. (1988). Nonprofit managers in different fields of service: Managerial tasks and management training. In O’NeillM.YoungD. (Eds.), Educating managers of nonprofit organizations (pp. 51–70). Praeger.
26.
DoddW.NelsonE. (2018). Shifting discourse and practice on food banks: Insights from a community–university partnership. Voluntas, 36, 849–865.
27.
DodgeJ.OspinaS. M. (2016). Nonprofits as “schools of democracy”: A comparative case study of two environmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 478–499.
28.
EdvardssonB.GustafssonA.RoosI. (2005). Service portraits in service research: A critical review. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(1), 107–121.
29.
EiglierP.LangeardE.LovelockC. H. (1977). Marketing consumer services: New insights. Marketing Science Institute.
30.
EikenberryA. M.MirabellaR. M.SandbergB. (Eds.) (2019). Reframing nonprofit organizations: Democracy, inclusion, and social change. Melvin & Leigh.
31.
EliasophN. (2009). Top-down civic projects are not grassroots associations: How the differences matter in everyday life. Voluntas, 20, 291–308.
32.
EwertB.EversA. (2014). An ambiguous concept: On the meanings of co-production for health care users and user organizations?Voluntas, 25(2), 425–442.
33.
FassinY.DeprezJ.Van den AbeeleA.HeeneA. (2017). Complementarities between stakeholder management and participative management: Evidence from the youth care sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(3), 586–606.
34.
FuchsV. R. (1968). The service economy. Columbia University Press.
35.
GeorgeW. R.BarksdaleH. C. (1974). Marketing activities in the service industries. Journal of Marketing, 38(4), 65–70.
36.
GersunyC.RosengrenW. R. (1973). The service society. Schenkman Publishing Company.
37.
GrönroosC. (1978). A service-oriented approach to marketing of services. European Journal of Marketing, 12(8), 588–601.
38.
GrönroosC. (2008). Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates?European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314.
39.
GrönroosC. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.
40.
GrönroosC.VoimaP. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.
41.
GubriumJ. F. (2016). From the iron cage to everyday life. In GubriumJ. F.AndreassenT. A.SolvangP. K. (Eds.), Reimagining the human service relationship (pp. 3–32). Columbia University Press.
42.
GuoC.MetelskyB. A.BradshawP. (2014). Out of the shadows: Nonprofit governance research from democratic and critical perspectives. In CornforthC. J.BrownW. A. (Eds.), New perspectives on nonprofit governance (pp. 63–84). Routledge.
43.
HasenfeldY. (1978). Client-organization relations: A systems perspective. In HasenfeldY. (Ed.), The management of human services (pp. 184–206). Columbia University Press.
44.
HasenfeldY. (1983). Human service organizations. Prentice Hall.
45.
HasenfeldY. (1992). Human services as complex organizations. SAGE.
46.
HasenfeldY. (2010). Human services as complex organizations. SAGE.
47.
HasenfeldY.EnglishR. A. (1974). Human service organizations: A book of readings. University of Michigan Press.
48.
HeinonenK.StrandvikT.MickelssonK.EdvardssonB.SundströmE.AnderssonP. (2010). A customer-dominant logic of service. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 531–548.
49.
HunterS.RitchieP. (2007). Co-production and personalisation in social care: Changing relationships in the provision of social care (Vol. 49). Jessica Kingsley.
50.
HustinxL.De WaeleE. (2015). Managing hybridity in a changing welfare mix: Everyday practices in an entrepreneurial nonprofit in Belgium. Voluntas, 26(5), 1666–1689.
51.
JoS.NabatchiT. (2018). Co-production, co-creation, and citizen empowerment. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 231–239). Routledge.
52.
KramerR. M. (1987). Voluntary agencies and the personal social services. In PowellW. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 244–257). Yale University Press.
53.
LeftonM.RosengrenW. R. (1966). Organizations and clients: Lateral and longitudinal dimensions. American Sociological Review, 31, 802–810.
54.
LemberV. (2018). The increasing role of digital technologies in co-production. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 115–127). Routledge.
55.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
56.
LoefflerE.BovairdT. (2018). Assessing the effect of co-production on outcomes, service quality and efficiency. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 269–280). Routledge.
57.
MarkströmU.KarlssonM. (2013). Towards hybridization: The roles of Swedish non-profit organizations within mental health. Voluntas, 24(4), 917–934.
58.
McGinnisM. D. (2011). An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 169–183.
59.
MiddletonM. (1986). Nonprofit management: A report on current research and areas for development. Program on Non-Profit Organizations, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.
60.
MillsP. K.MorrisJ. H. (1986). Clients as “partial” employees of service organizations: Role development in client participation. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 726–735.
61.
MirabellaR. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 11S–27S.
62.
MirabellaR. M.EikenberryA. M. (2017). The missing “social” in social enterprise education in the United States. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 23(2), 729–748.
63.
MirabellaR. M.GemelliG.MalcolmM.-J.BergerG. (2007). Nonprofit and philanthropic studies: International overview of the field in Africa, Canada, Latin America, Asia, the Pacific, and Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(Suppl. 4), 110S–135S.
64.
NettingF. E.O’ConnorM. K.ThomasM. L.YanceyG. (2005). Mixing and phasing of roles among volunteers, staff, and participants in faith-based programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(2), 179–205.
65.
NormannR. (1984). Service management: Strategy and leadership in service businesses. John Wiley.
66.
O’NeillM. (2005). Developmental contexts of nonprofit management education. In D. Burlingame, & D. C. Hammack (Eds.), Education for a civil society: A summary of the 2004 conference (pp. 5–14). Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
67.
O’NeillM.FletcherK. (1998). Nonprofit management education: US and world perspectives. Greenwood/Praeger.
68.
O’NeillM.YoungD. R. (1988). Educating managers of nonprofit organizations. Praeger.
69.
OnyxJ.DarcyS.GrabowskiS.GreenJ.MaxwellH. (2018). Researching the social impact of arts and disability: Applying a new empirical tool and method. Voluntas, 29(3), 574–589.
70.
OsborneS. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: Are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation?Public Management Review, 20(2), 225–231.
71.
OsborneS.StrokoschK.RadnorZ. (2018). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A perspective from service management 1. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 18–26). Routledge.
72.
OstromE. (1978). Citizen participation and policing: What do we know?Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 7(1–2), 102–108.
73.
OstromE. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
74.
OstromV.BishF. P. (Eds.). (1977). Comparing urban service delivery systems: Structure and performance (Vol. 12). SAGE.
75.
OstromV.OstromE. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31(2), 203–216.
76.
OstromV.OstromE. (1977). Public goods and public choices. In SavasE. S. (Ed.), Alternatives for delivering public services: Toward improved performance (pp. 7–49). Westview Press.
77.
ParksR. B.BakerP. C.KiserL.OakersonR.OstromE. V. V.. . . WilsonR. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.
78.
ParsonsT. (1961). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. In EtzioniA. (Ed.), Complex organizations: A sociological reader (pp. 32–47). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
79.
ParsonsT. (1970). How are clients integrated into service organizations? In RosengrenW. R.LeftonM. (Eds.), Organizations and clients (pp. 1–16). Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
80.
PatonR.MordauntJ.CornforthC. (2007). Beyond nonprofit management education: Leadership development in a time of blurred boundaries and distributed learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 148S–162S.
81.
PestoffV. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas, 23(4), 1102–1118.
82.
PestoffV.BrandsenT. (2008). Co-production: The third sector and the delivery of public services. Routledge.
83.
PestoffV.BrandsenT.VerschuereB. (2013). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production (Vol. 7). Routledge.
84.
PrahaladC. K.RamaswamyV. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.
85.
RichR. C.GreggP. (1975, April). Neighborhood organization and urban administration [National conference]. American Society for Public Administration, Chicago, IL, United States.
86.
RosengrenW. R.LeftonM. (1970). Organizations and clients: Essays in the sociology of service. Merrill Publishing Company.
87.
RosentraubM. S.SharpE. B. (1981). Consumers as producers of social services: Coproduction and the level of social services. Southern Review of Public Administration, 4, 502–539.
88.
SagerR.StephensL. S. (2005). Serving up sermons: Clients’ reactions to religious elements at congregation-run feeding establishments. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(3), 297–315.
89.
SapolskyR. (2005). Sick of poverty. Scientific America, 293, 92–99.
90.
SchlappaH.ImaniY. (2018). Who is in the lead? New perspectives on leading service co-production. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 99–108). Routledge.
91.
SharpE. B. (1978). Citizen organizations in policing issues and crime prevention: Incentives for participation. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 7(1–2), 45–58.
92.
SharpE. B. (1980). Toward a new understanding of urban services and citizen participation: The coproduction concept. Midwest Review of Public Administration, 14(2), 105–118.
93.
ShostackG. L. (1977). Breaking free from product marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 73–80.
94.
SmithD. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472.
95.
SteenT.TuurnasS. (2018). The roles of the professional in co-production and co-creation processes. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 80–92). Routledge.
96.
SundeenR. A.SiegelG. B. (1987). The community and departmental contexts of volunteer use by police. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(3), 43–53.
97.
ThøgersenM. (2015). Explaining collaboration and commitment in Danish non-profit organizations: Linking institutional environments to outcomes. Voluntas, 26(5), 1639–1665.
98.
ValeauP.EynaudP.Chatelain-PonroyS.SponemS. (2019). Toward a reassessment of the role of rank-and-file stakeholders in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 146–172.
99.
VamstadJ. (2012). Co-production and service quality: The case of cooperative childcare in Sweden. Voluntas, 23(4), 1173–1188.
100.
van EijkC. (2018). Helping Dutch neighborhood watch schemes to survive the rainy season: Studying mutual perceptions on citizens’ and professionals’ engagement in the co-production of community safety. Voluntas, 29(1), 222–236.
101.
van EijkC.GascóM. (2018). Unravelling the co-producers: Who are they and what motivations do they have? In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 63–76). Routledge.
102.
VerschuereB.VanleeneD.SteenT.BrandsenT. (2018). Democratic co-production: Concepts and determinants. In BrandsenT.VerschuereB.SteenT. (Eds.), Co-production and co-creation (pp. 243–251). Routledge.
103.
VuC. M.NguyenD.TanhD. B.ChunJ. (2017). Case study of an ethnic community-based organization in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 199–217.
104.
WalkM.GreenspanI.CrossleyH.HandyF. (2015). Social return on investment analysis: A case study of a job and skills training program offered by a social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2), 129–144.
105.
WellensL.JegersM. (2016). From consultation to participation: The impact of beneficiaries on nonprofit organizations’ decision making and output. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(3), 295–312.
106.
WhitakerG. P. (1976). Size and effectiveness in the delivery of human services. Workshop in Political Theory & Policy Analysis, Indiana University.
107.
WhitakerG. P. (1980). Citizens’ participation in the delivery of human services. In FosterC. (Ed.), Comparative public policy and citizen participation (pp. 137–152). Elsevier.
108.
YoungD. (1991). Preliminary draft: A professional society for nonprofit researchers.
109.
YoungD. (2005). Framing the issues. In BurlingameD.HammackD. C. (Eds.), Education for a civil society: A summary of the 2004 conference (pp. 15–17). Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
