Nonprofit revenue sources have significant consequences for how we understand the sector, its power, and sources of accountability. Earned income is an important element of the nonprofit revenue mix. And while commercialism among nonprofits has received some attention, there has been relatively little research seeking to understand the types of earned income that nonprofits are using and the non-commercial, mission-enhancing objectives that these activities potentially serve. This research note addresses that gap through an analysis of one type of earned income: retail operations. The note begins by situating retail within the wider literature on nonprofit revenue, and then introduces the concept of a nonprofit retail operation (NRO). It then introduces a typology of NRO formats, distinguished by the objectives that they serve. Next, it provides descriptive cross-national data on NROs using a dataset of 22 leading international non-governmental organizations in 12 countries. Finally, it discusses areas for future NRO research.
AoyamaY.ParthasarathyB. (2016). The rise of the hybrid domain: Collaborative governance for social innovation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
2.
BillisD. (2010). Toward a theory of hybrid organizations. In BillisD. (Ed.), Hybrid organisations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy (pp. 46-69). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
British Red Cross Finance Committee. (1991). Key issues raised by the branches to the five year plan. London, UK: Author.
4.
British Red Cross Society. (1991). Five year plan 1992-1996: Skilled care in need and crisis (Version 25.9.1991). London, UK: Author.
5.
BroadbridgeA.ParsonsL. (2003). Still serving the community? The professionalisation of the UK charity retail sector. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31, 418-427.
DartR. (2004). Being “business-like” in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 290-310.
8.
EbrahimA.BattilanaJ.MairJ. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81-100.
9.
EckerdA.MoultonS. (2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 656-685.
10.
EikenberryA. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 582-596.
11.
EikenberryA.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration Review, 64, 132-140.
12.
Esping-AndersonG. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
13.
FischerR.WilskerA.YoungD. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 662-681.
14.
FordJ.MottnerS. (2003). Retailing in the nonprofit sector: An exploratory analysis of church-connected retailing ventures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8, 337-348.
15.
GregsonN.CreweL.BrooksK. (2002). Discourse, displacement, and retail practice: Some pointers from the charity retail project. Environmental Planning A, 34, 1661-1683.
16.
GuoB. (2006). Charity for profit? Exploring factors associated with the commercialization of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 123-138.
17.
Harrison-EvansP. (2016). Shopping for good: The social benefits of charity retail. London, England: Demos.
18.
HerranzJ.Jr.CouncilL.McKayB. (2011). Tri-value organization as a form of social enterprise: The case of Seattle’s FareStart. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 829-849.
19.
HorneS. (1998). Charity shops in the UK. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 26, 155-161.
HugN.JägerU. (2014). Resource-based accountability: A case study on multiple accountability relations in an economic development nonprofit. Voluntas, 25, 772-796.
22.
HughesP.LuksetichW. (2004). Nonprofit arts organizations: Do funding sources influence spending patterns?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 203-220.
23.
JamesE. (1983). How nonprofits grow: A model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2, 350-365.
24.
JonesR.ReynoldsF. (2019). The contribution of charity shop volunteering to a positive experience of ageing. Journal of Occupational Science, 26, 524-536.
25.
KamatS. (2004). The privatization of public interest: Theorizing NGO discourse in a neoliberal era. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 155-176.
26.
KimM.PandeyS.PandeyS. (2017). Why do nonprofit performing arts organizations offer free public access?Public Administration Review, 78, 139-150.
27.
KnutsenW. L. (2012). Value as a self-sustaining mechanism: Why some nonprofit organizations are different from and similar to private and public organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 985-1005.
28.
LasbyD. (2013). Earned income-generating activities among Canadian charities. Toronto, Ontario: Imagine Canada.
29.
LiV. (2017). “Shopping for change”: World Vision Canada and consumption-oriented philanthropy in the age of philanthrocapitalism. Voluntas, 28, 455-471.
30.
LivingstoneN. (2011). The changing structure of charity retailers in Edinburgh’s built environment. Local Economy, 26, 122-133.
31.
LovattM. (2015). Charity shops and the imagined futures of objects: How second-hand markets influence disposal decisions when emptying a parent’s house. Culture Unbound, 7, 13-29.
32.
McBreartyS. (2007). Social enterprise—A solution for the voluntary sector?Social Enterprise Journal, 31, 67-77.
MohanJ.BreezeB. (2016). The logic of charity: Great expectations in hard times. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
MottnerS.FordJ. (2005). Measuring nonprofit marketing strategy performance: The case of museum stores. Journal of Business Research, 58, 829-840.
36.
ParsonsE. (2004). Charity shop managers in the UK: Becoming more professional?Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 11, 259-268.
37.
ParsonsE.BroadbridgeA. (2006). Job motivation and satisfaction: Unpacking the key factors for charity shop managers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 121-131.
38.
PodkalickaA.MeeseJ. (2012). “Twin transformations”: The Salvation Army’s charity shops and the recreating of material and social value. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15, 721-735.
SchiffJ.WeisbrodB. (1991). Competition between for-profit and nonprofit organizations in commercial markets. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62, 619-639.
43.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
StroupS.WongW. (2017). The authority trap: Strategic choices of international NGOs. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
45.
ThompsonP.WilliamsR. (2014). Taking your eyes off the objective: The relationship between income sources and satisfaction with achieving objectives in the UK third sector. Voluntas, 25, 109-137.
46.
WeisbrodB. (Ed.). (1998). To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WilliamsC. (2002). Why do people use alternative retail channels? Some case-study evidence from two English cities. Urban Studies, 39, 1897-1910.
48.
YoungD.WilskerA.GrinsfelderM. C. (2010). Understanding the determinants of nonprofit income portfolios. Voluntary Sector Review, 1, 161-173.
