Do non-Westerners donate differently? Drawing on a unique survey after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, this article reports some empirical findings about Chinese donation behavior. Our empirical analysis confirms the importance of various socioeconomic factors in charitable giving. What distinguishes the Chinese case from other societies is the role of politics. Political attitudes affect how people donate: Less trustful individuals and less dependent communities do not embrace state-centered charity enthusiastically. Our research expands the spatial coverage of the charity study that is dominated by experiences and practices from European and North American countries. To generate hypotheses about political attitudes, we develop a simple political model of charity. Placing politicians’ survival motivation at the center opens up new inquiries that are underexplored by current literature. It also inspires further research into comparative institutional designs of charity across national boundaries.
AbramsB.SchitzM. (1978). The “crowding-out” effect of governmental transfers on private charitable contributions. Public Choice, 33, 29-39.
2.
AlesinaA.FerraraE. (2000). Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 847-904.
3.
AndreoniJ. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447-1458.
4.
AndreoniJ. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464-477.
5.
BekkersR. (2012). Trust and volunteering: Selection or causation? Evidence from a 4 year panel study. Political Behavior, 34, 225-247.
6.
BekkersR.WiepkingP. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 927-973.
7.
BrooksA. (2003). Do government subsidies to nonprofits crowd out donations or donors?Public Finance Review, 31, 166-179.
8.
China Charity Information Center. (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015). China charity giving report. Beijing, China: China Society Press.
9.
CraggJ. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica, 39, 829-844.
10.
DelheyJ.NewtonK. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism?European Sociological Review, 21, 311-327.
11.
DicksonB. (2014). Who wants to be a communist? Career incentives and mobilized loyalty in China. China Quarterly, 217, 42-68.
12.
EtzioniA. (1993). The spirit of community: The reinvention of American society. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
13.
FeldmanN. (2010). Time is money: Choosing between charitable activities. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 21, 103-130.
14.
GlaeserE.LaibsonD.ScheinkmanJ.SoutterC. (2000). Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811-846.
15.
GlazerA.KonradK. (1996). A signaling explanation for charity. American Economic Review, 86, 1019-1028.
16.
HarbaughW. (1998). What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 67, 269-284.
17.
HoogheM.StolleD. (Eds.). (2003). Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Springer.
18.
HowellJ. (2004). New directions in civil society. In HowellJ. (Ed.), Governance in China (pp. 143-171). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
HuntoonL. (2001). Government use of nonprofit organizations to build social capital. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 157-158.
20.
KarlanD.ListJ. (2007). Does price matter in charitable giving? Evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. American Economic Review, 97, 1774-1793.
21.
LeeB.FarrellC. (2003). Buddy, can you spare a dime? Homelessness, panhandling, and the public. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 299-324.
22.
LeviM.StokerL. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
23.
LiH.TangS.-Y.LoW.-H. (2018). The institutional antecedents of managerial networking in Chinese environmental NGOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 325-346.
24.
LiL. (2004). Political trust in rural China. Modern China, 30, 228-258.
25.
LiX. (2008). Civil affairs in 30 years. Beijing, China: China Society Publisher.
26.
ListJ.Lucking-ReileyD. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: Experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215-233.
27.
ListJ.PriceM. (2012). Charitable giving around the world: Thoughts on how to expand the pie. CESifo Economic Studies, 58, 1-30.
28.
LuY.TaoR. (2017). Organizational structure and collective action: Lineage networks, semi-autonomous civic associations, and collective resistance in rural China. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 1726-1774.
29.
MansbridgeJ. (1999). Altruistic trust. In WarrenM. (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 290-310). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30.
MurphyR. (2002). How migrant labor is changing China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
NathanA. (2003). China’s resilient authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 14, 6-17.
32.
OiJ. (1992). Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics, 45, 99-126.
33.
OktenC.OsiliU. (2004). Contributions in heterogeneous communities: Evidence from Indonesia. Population Economics, 17, 603-626.
34.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
35.
QiF. (2009, August19). Wenchuan donations stirred controversies again. International Herald Leader, p. 1B.
36.
ReeceW. (1979). Charitable contributions: New evidence on household behavior. American Economic Review, 69, 142-151.
37.
RotterJ. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
38.
SalamonL.SokolowskiW.HaddockM.TiceH. (2013). The state of global civil society and volunteering (Working paper No. 49). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
39.
SchneiderJ. A. (2007). Connections and disconnections between civic engagement and social capital in community-based nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 572-597.
40.
ShueV. (2006). The quality of mercy: Confucian charity and the mixed metaphors of modernity in Tianjin. Modern China, 32, 411-452.
41.
SimonA. (1997). Television news and international earthquake relief. Journal of Communication, 47, 82-93.
42.
TsaiL. (2007). Accountability without democracy: Solidary groups and public goods provision in rural China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
UslanerE. M.BrownM. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868-894.
45.
Van SlykeD.BrooksA. (2005). Why do people give? New evidence and strategies for nonprofit managers. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 199-222.
46.
WilhelmM. (2006). New data on charitable giving in the PSID. Economics Letters, 92, 26-31.
WuZ.ZhaoR.ZhangX.LiuF. (2018). The impact of social capital on volunteering and giving: Evidence from urban China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 1201-1222.
49.
ZhangC. (2018). Nongovernmental organizations’ policy advocacy and government responsiveness in China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 723-744.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
