Volunteers are mission-critical resources, and the ongoing ability of many nonprofit organizations to serve their constituencies is dependent on such contributed services. Utilizing an online questionnaire administered to coordinators of volunteers, the study investigates perceptions and practices in the Australian nonprofit sector in the reporting of volunteer contributions of services. We find (N = 166) that although organizations place high value on volunteer contributions, the benefits and impact are rarely reported. The majority of respondents consider that a statement of volunteer contributions should be included alongside financial statements to give a more complete representation of organizational performance. This would enhance the accountability and legitimacy of the organization. No regulatory requirement to report and a lack of resources are cited as the predominate reasons for current nondisclosure. The findings support the need for a best practice model for recording and reporting volunteer contributions to recognize the significance of the resource.
AlexanderJ.BrudneyJ. L.YangK. (2010). Introduction to the symposium: Accountability and performance measurement: The evolving role of nonprofits in the hollow state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 565-570.
2.
AndersonP. M.ZimmererM. E. (2003). Dollar value of volunteer time: A review of five estimation methods. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 21, 39-44.
BanksW.NelsonM. (1994). Financial disclosures by Ontario universities: 1988-1993. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing, and Taxation, 3, 287-305.
6.
BeckerA. (2018). An experimental study of voluntary non-profit accountability and effects on public trust, reputation, perceived quality, and donation behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 562-582.
7.
ButcherJ. (2006). Government, the third sector and the rise of social capital. Third Sector Review, 12, 69-88.
8.
CandlerG.DumontG. (2010). A non-profit accountability framework. Canadian Public Administration, 53, 259-279.
9.
Charity Commission and Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator. (2014). Charities SORP (FRS 102): Accounting and Reporting by Charities: Statement of Recommended Practice applicable to Charities preparing their accounts in accordance with the Financial Reporting Standards applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland (FRS 102) effective 1 January 2015, London. Charity Commission for England and Wales. Retrieved from http://www.charitysorp.org/media/619101/frs102_complete.pdf
ConnollyC.DhananiA. (2009). Narrative reporting by UK charities. London, England: Association of Certified Chartered Accountants, Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
12.
ConnollyC.HyndmanN.McMahonD. (2009). Charity reporting and accounting: Taking stock and future reform. London, England: Charity Commission.
13.
ConsidineM. (2000). Selling the unemployed: The performance of bureaucracies, firms and non-profits in the new Australian “market” for unemployment assistance. Social Policy & Administration, 34, 274-295.
14.
CorderyC. J.BaskervilleR. F. (2011). Charity transgressions, trust and accountability. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 197-213.
15.
CorderyC. J.Proctor-ThomsonS.SmithK. A. (2011). Valuing volunteer contributions to charities. Public Money & Management, 31, 193-200.
16.
CoyD.FischerM.GordonT. (2001). Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12, 1-31.
17.
DeeganC. (2007). Organisational legitimacy as a motive for sustainability reporting. In UnermanJ.BebbingtonJ.O’DwyerB. (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 127-149). London, England: Routledge.
18.
EbrahimA. (2003). Making sense of accountability: Conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 191-212.
19.
EbrahimA. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 56-87.
20.
EbrahimA.WeisbandE. (2007). Global accountabilities: Participation, pluralism, and public ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
EikenberryA. M.KluverJ. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk?Public Administration, 64, 132-140.
22.
FreemanR. E.ReedD. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25, 88-106.
23.
FryR. E. (1995). Accountability in organizational life: Problem or opportunity for nonprofits?Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 6, 181-195.
24.
GeerB. W.MaherJ. K.ColeM. T. (2008). Managing nonprofit organizations: The importance of transformational leadership and commitment to operating standards for nonprofit accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 51-75.
25.
GrayR. H. (1993). Accounting for the environment. London, England: Paul Chapman.
26.
GrayR. H.DeyC.OwenD.EvansR.ZadekS. (1997). Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: Stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10, 325-364.
27.
GrayR. H.KouhyR.LaversS. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 47-77.
28.
GrayR. H.OwenD.AdamsC. (1996). Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate and social reporting. London, England: Prentice-Hall.
29.
HandyF.SrinivasanN. (2004). Improving quality while reducing costs? An economic evaluation of the net benefits of hospital volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 28-54.
30.
HarpE. R.SchererL. L.AllenJ. A. (2017). Volunteer engagement and retention: Their relationship to community service self-efficacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46, 442-458.
HyndmanN. (1990). Charity accounting—An empirical study of the information needs of contributors to UK fund raising charities. Financial Accountability & Management, 6, 295-307.
KearnsK. (1994). The strategic management accountability in non-profit organizations: An analytical framework. Public Administration Review, 54, 185-192.
36.
Le RouxK. (2009). Managing stakeholder responsiveness to clients and funding agents in non-profit social service organizations. Administration & Society, 41, 158-184.
37.
LindblomC. K. (1994, June). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York, NY.
38.
LyonsM. (2009). Measuring and comparing civil society cross-nationally. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 1-14.
39.
MathewsM. R. (1997). Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research: Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10, 481-531.
40.
MillarM. E.AbrahamA. (2004, November24-26). A rationale for the application of the “gift-exchange” paradigm to volunteerism by a non-profit organisation in a Melanesian culture. Paper presented at the Building bridges and strengthening bonds: Broadening our understanding of third sector diversity across regions and diversity, Australia and New Zealand Third Sector Research Conference (ANZTSR), Brisbane. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1983&context=commpapers
41.
MitchellR. K.AgleB. R.WoodD. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
42.
MookL.QuarterJ. (2004). Estimating and reporing the value of volunteer contributions: Results of a survey of Canadian nonprofit organizations. Toronto, Canada: The Canadian Centre for Philanthropy’s Knowledge Development Centre.
43.
MookL.HandyF.QuarterJ. (2007). Reporting volunteer labour at the organizational level: A study of Canadian nonprofits. Voluntas: The International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18, 55-71.
44.
MookL.SousaJ.ElgieS.QuarterJ. (2005). Accounting for the value of volunteer contributions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15, 401-415.
45.
MortG.WeerawardenaJ. (2008). Social entrepreneurship advancing research and maintaining relevance. In SargeantA.WymerW. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to nonprofit marketing (pp. 28-48). London, England: Routledge.
46.
NarrawayG.CorderyC. (2009). Volunteers, Valuable but Invisible to Accountants?Third Sector Review, 15, 11-29.
47.
New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants. (2007). Not for profit financial reporting guide. Wellington: Author.
48.
O’BrienE.TooleyS. (2013). Accounting for volunteer services: A deficiency in accountability. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10, 279-294.
49.
O’DwyerB.UnermanJ. (2007). From functional to social accountability: Transforming the accountability relationship between funders and non-governmental development organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20, 446-471.
50.
O’DwyerB.UnermanJ. (2008). The paradox of greater NGO accountability: A case study of Amnesty Ireland. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 801-824.
51.
OspinaS.DiazW.O’SullivanJ. (2002). Negotiating accountability: Managerial lessons from identity-based non-profit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 5-31.
52.
QuarterJ.MookL.RichmondB. (Eds.). (2003). What counts: Social accounting for nonprofits and cooperatives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53.
RaggoP. (2011, June). Accountability beyond accounting. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Public Management Research Association Conference, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, NY.
54.
RichmondB. J.MookL.QuarterJ. (2003). Social accounting for nonprofits, two models. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13, 308-324.
55.
RobertsJ. (1991). The possibilities of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16, 355-368.
56.
RyanC.MackJ.TooleyS.IrvineH. (2014). Do not-for-profits need their own conceptual framework?Financial Accountability & Management, 30, 383-402.
57.
RyanC.StanleyT.NelsonM. (2002). Accountability disclosures by Queensland local government councils: 1997-1999. Financial Accountability & Management, 18, 261-289.
SamkinG.SchneiderA. (2010). Accountability, narrative reporting and legitimation: The case of a New Zealand public benefit entity. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23, 256-289.
StuderS. (2016). Volunteer management: Responding to the uniqueness of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 688-714.
62.
TorresL.PinaV. (2003). Accounting for Accountability and Management in NPOs: A comparative study of four countries: Canada, the United Kingdom, the USA and Spain. Financial Accountability & Management, 19, 265-285.
63.
ValentinovV. (2011). Accountability and the public interest in the non-profit sector: A conceptual framework. Financial Accountability & Management, 27, 32-42.
64.
WeerawardenaJ.McDonaldR.MortG. (2010). Sustainability of non-profit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business, 45, 346-356.
65.
YankelovichD. (1972). Corporate priorities: A continuing study of the new demands on business. Stamford, CT: Daniel Yankelovich.
