To what extent do leaders of nonprofit organizations run for elected office? We address this question through an exploratory study using survey data from a random sample of 184 leaders of nonprofit human service organizations in the United States. Drawing upon theories of political ambition, we explore the factors that may shape nascent political ambition (propensity to run) as well as expressive political ambition (running for office). We find that nonprofit leaders are no more likely to run for office than the average citizen, but interest in running is much more common. We identify several individual-level and professional socialization factors associated with political ambition. Our study makes an important theoretical contribution by outlining a model of political ambition for the nonprofit sector that can be tested in future studies, and makes an important practical contribution by highlighting ways that associations and nonprofit industry groups might convert nascent ambition into expressive ambition.
BalassianoK.ChandlerM. (2010). The emerging role of nonprofit associations in advocacy and public policy: Trends, issues, and prospects. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 946-955.
2.
BerryJ. M.AronsD. F. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
3.
BlackG. S. (1972). A theory of political ambition: Career choices and the role of structural incentives. American Political Science Review, 66, 144-159.
4.
BledsoeT.HerringM. (1990). Victims of circumstances: Women in pursuit of political office. American Political Science Review, 84, 213-223.
5.
BrowningR. P. (1968). The interaction of personality and political system in decisions to run for office: Some data and a simulation technique. Journal of Social Issues, 24, 93-109.
6.
CanonD. T. (1990). Actors, athletes, and astronauts: Political amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
ConoverP. J.GrayV. (1983). Feminism and the new right: Conflict over the American family. New York, NY: Praeger.
10.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
11.
FirthD. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27-38.
12.
FoxR. L. (1997). Gender dynamics in congressional elections (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2005). To run or not to run for office: Explaining nascent political ambition. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 642-659.
14.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L. (2010). If only they’d ask: Gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics, 72, 310-326.
15.
FoxR. L.LawlessJ. L.FeeleyC. (2001). Gender and the decision to run for office. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26, 411-435.
16.
GuoC.AcarM. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency, institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 340-361.
17.
GuoC.SaxtonG. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 57-79.
18.
HainP. L. (1974). Age, ambitions, and political careers: The middle-age crisis. Western Political Quarterly, 27, 265-274.
19.
HochschildJ. L. (1995). Facing up to the American dream: Race, class, and the soul of the nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
JaskyteK. (2004). Transformational leadership, organizational culture, and innovativeness in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 153-168.
21.
JohansenM.LeRouxK. (2013). Managerial networking in nonprofit organizations: The impact of networking on organizational and advocacy effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 73, 355-363.
22.
KimS. E.LeeJ. W. (2007). Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? An empirical analysis of a nonprofit human services agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 227-248.
23.
KingG.ZengL. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9, 137-163.
LasswellH. D. (1948). Power and personality (1st ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
26.
LawlessJ. L. (2012). Becoming a candidate: Political ambition and the decision to run for office. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
LawlessJ. L.FoxR. L. (2001). Political participation of the urban poor. Social Problems, 48, 362-385.
28.
LeRouxK.GoerdelH. (2009). Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 514-536.
29.
MosleyJ. E. (2012). Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 841-866.
National Association of Social Workers. (2005). Code of Ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
32.
Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 5-21.
33.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
34.
PrewittK. (1965). Political socialization and leadership selection. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 361, 96-111.
35.
PrewittK.EulauH.ZiskB. H. (1966). Political socialization and political roles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 30, 569-582.
SchlesingerJ. A. (1966). Ambition and politics: Political careers in the United States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
38.
SouleJ. W. (1969). Future political ambitions and the behavior of incumbent state legislators. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13, 439-454.
39.
ThomsenD. M. (2014). Ideological moderates won’t run: How party fit matters for partisan polarization in Congress. The Journal of Politics, 76, 786-797.
40.
VerbaS.NieN. H. (1972). Participation in America: Social equality and political democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
41.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
VittinghoffE.McCullochC. E. (2007). Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 710-718.
