Increasing third-party intervention in volunteering represents a key change in the environment of volunteering. One significant expression is “workfare volunteering”: the governmental use of volunteering to foster the economic and/or social reintegration of social assistance recipients. We contribute to existing theory on “third-party volunteering” by studying the shifting discursive field in which volunteering becomes re-entangled with workfare volunteering. Our contribution is based on a governmentality-inspired discourse analysis of internal documents on workfare volunteering in one Belgian social assistance center. We conclude that workfare volunteering entails a strong violation of “voluntary” and “unpaid” properties of volunteering, relegates volunteering to an inferior status relative to paid work, and depicts workfare volunteers as suffering from a clear deficit: the inability to work under regular labor market condition. Through the discursive entanglement of various citizenship frames, the workfare volunteer is cast as an ever-aspiring, yet permanently failing citizen.
BacchiC. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?Frenchs Forest, Australia: Pearson.
2.
BacchiC. (2012). Why study problematisations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2(1), 1-8.
3.
BenensonJ. (2017). Civic engagement and economic opportunity among low-income individuals: An asset-based approach. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Associations, 28, 988-1014.
4.
BenensonJ.StaggA. (2016). An asset-based approach to volunteering: Exploring benefits for low-income volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(IS), 131S-149S.
5.
BessantJ. (2000). Regulating the unemployed: Australia’s Work-for-the-Dole scheme. Journal of Australian Studies, 24(64), 75-84.
6.
BoltanskiL.ThévenotL. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1991)
7.
BorlandJ.TsengY.-P. (2011). Does “Work for the Dole” work? An Australian perspective on work experience programmes. Applied Economics, 43, 4353-4368.
8.
Bouverne-De BieM. (2005). Het OCMW en het recht op maatschappelijke dienstverlening [The Public Centre for Social Welfare and the right to social assistance]. In VrankenJ.De BoyserK.DierckxD. (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 2005 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 2005] (pp. 203-216). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
9.
BurgessJ.MitchellW. F.O’BrienD. J.WattsM. J. (2000). The developing workfare policy in Australia: A critical assessment. Journal of Socio-Economics, 29, 173-188.
10.
CaswellD.MarstonG.Elm LarsenJ. (2010). Unemployd citizen, or “at risk” client? Classification systems and employment services in Denmark and Australia. Critical Social Policy, 30, 384-404.
11.
ClarkeJ. (2005). New Labour’s citizens: Activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?Critical Social Policy, 25, 447-463.
12.
ClaryE. G.SnyderM.RidgeR. D.CopelandJ.StukasA. A.HaugenJ.MieneP. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1516-30.
13.
CnaanR. A.HandyF.WadsworthM. (1996). Defining who is a volunteer: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 364-383.
14.
CohenA. (2009). Welfare clients’ volunteering as a means of empowerment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 522-534.
15.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39, 124-130.
16.
CruikshankB. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
DanermarkB.EkströmM.JakobsenL.KarlssonJ. Ch. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. London, England: Routledge.
18.
DeanH.BonvinJ.-M.VielleP.FarvaqueN. (2005). Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. European Societies, 7, 3-26.
19.
DeanM. (1995). Governing the unemployed self in an active society. Economy and Society, 24, 559-583.
20.
DeanM. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London, England: Sage.
21.
DeemingC. (2016). Rethinking social policy. Social Policy and Administration, 15, 159-175.
22.
DillerM. (1998). Working without a job: The social message of the new workfare. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 9, 19-43.
23.
EliasophN. (2011). Making volunteers: Civic life after welfare’s end. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
EliasophN. (2013). The politics of volunteering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
25.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
26.
FoucaultM. (1986). The history of sexuality, Volume 2: The use of pleasure. New York, NY: Viking.
27.
FullerS.KershawP.PulkinghamJ. (2008). Constructing “active citizenship”: Single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism. Citizenship Studies, 12, 157-176.
28.
HaßR.Serrano-VelardeK. (2015). When doing good becomes a state affair: Voluntary service in Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Associations, 26, 1718-1738.
29.
HamiltonM. (2014). The “new social contract” and the individualization of risk in policy. Journal of Risk Research, 17, 453-467.
30.
Haski-LeventhalD.MeijsL. C. P. M.HustinxL. (2010). The third-party model: Enhancing volunteering through governments, corporations and educational institutes. Journal of Social Policy, 39, 139-158.
31.
HermansK. (2005). De actieve welvaartsstaat in werking: OCMWs en het activeren van leefloongerechtigden [The active welfare state in operation: Public Centres for Social Welfare and the activation of welfare clients]. In VrankenJ.De BoyserK.DierckxD. (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 2005 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 2005] (pp. 179-200). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
32.
HermansK.RaemaeckersP.CasmanM.-T. (2010). De actieve welvaartsstaat in België: van theorie naar praktijk [The active welfare state in Belgium: From theory to practice]. In DierckxD.Van HerckN.VrankenJ. (Eds.), Armoede in België [Poverty in Belgium] (pp. 102-126). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
33.
HohmeyerK.WolffJ. (2012). A fistful of euros: Is the German one-euro job workfare scheme effective for participants?International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, 174-185.
34.
HustinxL. (2010). Institutionally individualized volunteering: Towards a late modern re-construction. Journal of Civil Society, 6, 165-179.
35.
HustinxL.De WaeleE. (2015). Managing hybridity in a changing welfare mix: Everyday practices in an entrepreneurial nonprofit in Belgium. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Associations, 26, 1666-1689.
36.
HustinxL.De WaeleE.DelcourC. (2015). Hybridization in a corporatist third sector regime: Paradoxes of “responsibilized autonomy.”Voluntary Sector Review, 6, 115-134.
37.
HustinxL.MeijsL. (2011). Re-embedding volunteering: In search of a new collective ground. Voluntary Sector Review, 2, 5-21.
38.
IlcanS.BasokT. (2004). Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies, 8, 129-144.
39.
KamerādeD.PaineA. E. (2014). Volunteering and employability: Implications for policy and practice. Voluntary Sector Review, 5, 259-273.
40.
KampenT.ElshoutJ.TonkensE. (2013). The fragility of self-respect: Emotional labour of workfare volunteering. Social Policy & Society, 12, 427-438.
41.
KissaneR. J. (2010). Administrative challenges facing nonprofit worksites providing work or work-like experiences for welfare recipients. Sociological Perspectives, 53, 373-396.
42.
KrinskyJ.SimonetM. (2012). Servitude and volunteer work: The political exploitation of invisible labor in New York City parks. Sociétés Contemporaines, 87, 1-23.
43.
LubV.UyterlindeM. (2012). Evaluating state-promoted civic engagement and participation of vulnerable groups: The paradoxical policies of the Social Support Act in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Policy, 41373-390.
44.
LuytenD. (1994). Verschuivingen in het bijstandsbeleid [Shifts in social assistant policy]. In VrankenJ.GeldofD.Van MenxelG. (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 1994 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 1994] (pp. 118-128). Leuven: Acco.
45.
MaronA. (2012). Activation via intensive intimacies in the Israeli welfare-to-work program: Applying a constructivist approach to the governance of institutions and individuals. Administration and Society, 20(5), 1-25.
46.
McDonaldC.MarstonG. (2005). Workfare as welfare: Governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state. Critical Social Policy, 25, 374-401.
47.
MerriamS. B. (1995). What can you tell from an N of 1? Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Journal of Lifelong Learning, 4, 51-60.
48.
MillerP.RoseN. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
49.
MuehlebachA. (2011). On affective labor in post-Fordist Italy. Cultural Anthropology, 26, 59-82.
50.
NevilleP. (2016). Organised voluntarism in Ireland. Voluntas, 27, 724-745.
51.
NewmanJ.TonkensE. (2011). Introduction. In NewmanJ.TonkensE. (Eds.), Participation, responsibility and choice: Summoning the active citizen in Western European Welfare States (pp. 9-28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
52.
NicholsG.RalstonR. (2011). Social inclusion through volunteering: The legacy potential of the 2012 Olympic Games. Sociology, 45, 900-914.
53.
NovasC. (2006). The Political Economy of Hope: Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue. BioSocieties, 1(3), 289-305.
54.
PaineA. E.McKayS.MoroD. (2013). Does volunteering improve employability? Insights from the British Household Panel Survey and beyond. Voluntary Sector Review, 9, 355-376.
55.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2000). “Work first”: Workfare and the regulation of contingent labour markets. Cambridge Political Economy Society, 24, 119-138.
56.
PeckJ.TheodoreN. (2001). Exporting workfare/importing welfare-to-work: Exploring the politics of Third Way policy transfer. Political Geography, 20, 427-460.
PiatakJ. S. (2016). Time is on my side: A framework to examine when unemployed individals volunteer. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 1169-1190.
59.
RaeymaeckersP.DierckxD. (2009). Op zoek naar duurzame activering: een longitudinale analyse van activeringstrajecten in de Belgische OCMW’s [In search of sustainable activation: A longitudinal analysis of activation trajectories]. In VrankenJ.CampaertG.DierckxD.Van HaarlemA. (Eds.), Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 2009 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 2009] (pp. 163-180). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
60.
ReinM.SchönD. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In FischerF.ForesterJ. (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp.145-166). Durham, England: Duke University Press.
RoseN. (2000). Government and control. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 321-339.
63.
RoseN. (2010). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SchramS. F.SossJ.HouserL.FordingR. C. (2010). The third level of US welfare reform: Governmentality under neoliberal paternalism. Citizenship Studies, 14, 739-754.
65.
SenA. K. (1993). Capability and well-being. In NussbaumM.SenA. K. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30-53). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66.
SlootjesJ.KampenT. (2017). “Is my volunteer job not real work?” The experiences of migrant women with finding employment through volunteer work. Voluntas, 28, 1900-1921.
67.
SpiesH.van BerkelR. (2000). Workfare in the Netherlands—Young unemployed people and the Jobseeker’s Employment Act. In LødemelI.TrickeyH. (Eds.), “An offer you can’t refuse”: Workfare in international perspective (pp. 105-132). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
68.
StandingG. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London, England: Bloomsbury Academic.
69.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London, England: Sage.
70.
StricklandA. (2010). Recent developments in volunteering and citizenship. Voluntary Sector Review, 1, 253-258.
71.
StukasA. A.HoyeR.NicholsonM.BrownK. M.AisbettL. (2016). Motivations to volunteer and their associations with volunteers’ well-being. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 112-132.
72.
TõnuristP.SurvaL. (2017). Is volunteering always voluntary? Between compulsion and coercion in co-production. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Associations, 28, 223-247.
73.
TrickeyH. (2000). Comparing workfare programmes: Features and implications. In LødemelI.TrickeyH. (Eds.), “An offer you can’t refuse”: workfare in international perspective (pp. 249-293). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
74.
van BerkelR. (2006). The decentralization of social assistance in The Netherlands. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(1/2), 20-31.
75.
van BerkelR.De SchampeneireJ. (2001). The activation policies in Dutch and Belgian social policies. Journal of European Area Studies, 9, 27-42.
76.
Van DoorenG.KuppensJ.DruetzJ.StruyvenL.FranssenA. (2012). Sociale activering, tussen actief burgerschap en betaalde arbeid: een verkennend onderzoek naar de praktijk van sociale activering in de Belgische OCMW’s [Social activation, between active citizenship and paid work: An explorative investigation into the practice of social activation in Belgian Centres for Public Welfare]. Leuven, Belgium: KU Leuven-HIVA.
77.
Van OorschotW. (2002). Miracle or nightmare? A critical review of Dutch activation policies and their outcomes. Journal of Social Policy, 31, 399-420.
78.
VerschuereB.VancoppenolleD. (2010). Welzijn in Vlaanderen: beleid, bestuurlijke organisatie en uitdagingen [Welfare in Flanders: Policy, public administration, and challenges]. Brugge, Belgium: die Keure.
79.
VidalI. (2005). Social enterprise and social inclusion: Social enterprises in the sphere of work integration. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 807-825.
80.
VrankenJ.GeldofD.Van MenxelG. (1997). Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 1997 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 1997]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
81.
VrankenJ.GeldofD.Van MenxelG. (1999). Armoede en sociale uitsluiting: jaarboek 1999 [Poverty and social exclusion: Yearbook 1999]. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
82.
WarburtonJ.SmithJ. (2003). Out of the generosity of your heart: Are we creating active citizens through compulsory volunteer programmes for young people in Australia?Social Policy & Administration, 37, 772-786.
83.
WeilS. W.WildemeerschD.JansenT. (2005). Unemployed youth and social exclusion in Europe: Learning for inclusion?Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
84.
ZimmermanB. (2015). Work, labor: History of the concept. In WrightJ. D. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 25, 2nd ed., pp. 675-679). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
85.
ZimmermanB. (2017). Capabilities and working lives. In OttoH.-U.PantazisS.ZieglerH.PostiA. (Eds.), Human development in times of crisis: Renegotiating social justice (pp. 63-76). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
