Founders,Families,and Futures: Perspectives on the Accountability of Australian Private Ancillary Funds

Abstract

This research explores perspectives on the accountability of Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs), a type of Australian endowed philanthropic foundation. PAFs are relatively new giving structures that have experienced strong growth over the past 15 years. With limited regulatory obligations and exemptions available from public reporting, PAFs have discretion in various forms of public accountability. Using Ebrahim’s conceptual framework of nonprofit accountability, this study explores PAF accountability in terms of to whom, for what, how, and why, examining tensions between PAFs’ private form and public purpose. Through in-depth interviews with managers and trustees of 10 PAFs, findings reveal that PAFs engage in accountability for internal reasons relating to their mission and purpose, and their desire to lead others in philanthropy. PAFs are influenced by philanthropic peers, in particular other PAFs; but their accountability does not necessarily include public disclosure or transparency. Four variations to Ebrahim’s accountability framework are proposed.

Keywords

accountability philanthropy foundation Private Ancillary Funds Australia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvesson

(2003). Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: A reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 28, 13-33. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.8925191

Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission. (2012). Commissioner’s statement: Withholding or removing information from the ACNC Register. Melbourne: Australian Government. Retrieved from http://www.acnc.gov.au/ACNC/ACNC/Publications/Policy_PDFs/CommSt_Withhold.aspx

Australian Government Treasury. (2009a). Taxation Administration Act 1953—Private Ancillary Fund guidelines 2009. Retrieved from http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2009L03700/Download

Australian Government Treasury. (2009b). Taxation Administration Act 1953—Private Ancillary Fund guidelines 2009—Explanatory statement. Retrieved fromhttps://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2009L03700/Explanatory%20Statement/Text

Australian Taxation Office. (2016). Taxation statistics 2013-14: Charities—Table 4. Retrieved from https://data.gov.au/dataset/taxation-statistics-2013-14/resource/b63bc80d-e7dd-4aab-8dab-55fda8490804?view_id=15be5c62-1a85-482a-ad67-08918a35e1ea

Biernacki

Waldorf

(1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141-163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205

Bies

A. L.

(2010). Evolution of nonprofit self-regulation in Europe. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 1057-1086. doi:10.1177/0899764010371852

Blind

P. K.

(2011, July). Accountability in public service delivery: A multidisciplinary review of the concept. Paper presented at the Engaging Citizens to Enhance Public Sector Accountability and Prevent Corruption in the Delivery of Public Services, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan046363.pdf

Brody

Tyler

J. E.

(2010). Respecting foundation and charity autonomy: How public is private philanthropy? Chicago-Kent Law Review, 85, 571-617. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1522596

10.

Buteau

Glickman

Leiwant

Loh

(2016). Sharing what matters: Foundation transparency. Retrieved from http://research.effectivephilanthropy.org/sharing-what-matters-foundation-transparency

11.

Carman

J. G.

(2010). The accountability movement: What’s wrong with this theory of change? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 256-274. doi:10.1177/0899764008330622

12.

Cham

(2014). The rise and fall of Australia’s first independent regulator for the not-for-profit sector: A missed opportunity for philanthropy. Voluntary Sector Review, 5, 407-415. doi:10.1332/204080514X14151158784290

13.

Cooper

S. M.

Owen

D. L.

(2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 649-667. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.001

14.

Coyte

Rooney

Phua

(2013). The impossibility of philanthropic funding decisions: The Australian non-government funder experience. Financial Accountability & Management, 29, 397-418. doi:10.1111/faam.12020

15.

Dufton

(2014, February 27). Shining a light on foundations: Accountability, transparency and self-regulation. Philanthropy Impact. http://www.philanthropy-impact.org/article/shining-light-foundations-accountability-transparency-and-self-regulation

16.

Ebrahim

(2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. In Renz

D. O.

(Ed.), Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (3rd ed., pp. 110-121). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

17.

Edwards

(2009). Improving the integrity of prescribed private funds (Discussion paper submission from The Myer Foundation and Sidney Myer Fund). Canberra: Australian Government Treasury.

18.

Egan

(2014). Making water count: Water accountability change within an Australian university. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27, 259-282. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-07-2012-01059

19.

Eisenhardt

K. M.

(1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385

20.

Fereday

Muir-Cochrane

(2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80-92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107

21.

Fernandez

K. M.

Hager

M. A.

(2014). Public and private dimensions of grantmaking foundations. Public Administration Quarterly, 38, 405-439.

22.

Froelich

K. A.

(1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268. doi:10.1177/0899764099283002

23.

Frumkin

(2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

24.

Gavison

(1983). Information control: Availability and exclusion. In Benn

S. I.

Gaus

G. F.

(Eds.), Public and private in social life (pp. 145-213). London, England: Croom Helm.

25.

Gray

Bebbington

Collison

(2006). NGOs, civil society and accountability: Making the people accountable to capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19, 319-348. doi:10.1108/09513570610670325

26.

Gugerty

M. K.

(2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Policy Sciences, 42, 243-273. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9085-3

27.

Karsten

(2015). Scrutinize me, please! The drivers, manifestations and implications of accountability-seeking behaviour. Public Administration, 93, 684-699. doi:10.1111/padm.12164

28.

Koop

(2014). Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability. Public Administration, 92, 565-581. doi:10.1111/padm.12058

29.

Lawrence

T. B.

Hardy

Phillips

(2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281-290. doi:10.2307/3069297

30.

Leat

(2004). What do Australian foundations do—Who knows and who cares? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63, 95-104. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00381.x

31.

Leat

(2016). Philanthropic foundations, public good and public policy. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

32.

Leat

Williamson

Scaife

(2014). Performance measurement in perspective: An exploratory study of Australian foundations’ approaches to performance measurement. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/75993/

33.

Liffman

(2008). The cultural and social history of philanthropy in Australia. Australian Philanthropy, 67, pp. 4-5.

34.

Liket

(2014). Why “doing good” is not good enough: Essays on social impact measurement (Doctoral thesis). Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

35.

Lloyd

(2008). Promoting global accountability: The experiences of the Global Accountability Project. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 14, 273-281. doi:10.5555/ggov.2008.14.3.273

36.

Mashaw

J. L.

(2006). Accountability and institutional design: Some thoughts on the grammar of governance (Public law working papers: Public accountability: Designs, dilemmas and experiences). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

37.

McDonald

Scaife

(2011). Print media portrayals of giving: Exploring national “cultures of philanthropy.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16, 311-324. doi:10.1002/nvsm.430

38.

McGregor-Lowndes

(2000). Australia’s nonprofit taxation reforms. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 2(3). Retrieved from http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol2iss3/art_3.htm

39.

McGregor-Lowndes

(2014). Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs) 2000-2012. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/74042/

40.

McGregor-Lowndes

Crittall

(2015). Ancillary Funds 2000-2013. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/86510/1/2015_5_Ancillary%20Funds%20revised%2021.01.2016.pdf

41.

McLeod

(2013). The PAF report—Private Ancillary Funds after 12 years. Melbourne, Australia: JBWere.

42.

McLeod

(2014a). Innovative ways of operating a PAF. Retrieved from http://www.probonoaustralia.com.au/news/2014/01/innovative-ways-operating-paf#

43.

McLeod

(2014b). The PAF report—Record fund numbers and distributions. Melbourne, Australia: JBWere.

44.

Murtaza

(2012). Putting the lasts first: The case for community-focused and peer-managed NGO accountability mechanisms. Voluntas, 23, 109-125. doi:10.1007/s11266-011-9181-9

45.

Phillips

S. D.

(2013). Shining light on charities or looking in the wrong place? Regulation-by-transparency in Canada. Voluntas, 24, 881-905. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9374-5

46.

Prakash

Gugerty

M. K.

(2010). Trust but verify? Voluntary regulation programs in the nonprofit sector. Regulation & Governance, 4, 22-47. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01067.x

47.

Dumay

(2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8, 238-264. doi:10.1108/11766091111162070

48.

Roberts

(2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for “intelligent” accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 957-970. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005

49.

Rourke

(2014). Philanthropy and the limits of accountability: A relationship of respect and clarity. Retrieved from http://www.pacefunders.org/publications/philanthropy-and-the-limits-of-accountability.pdf

50.

Salamon

L. M.

(1992). America’s nonprofit sector: A primer (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Foundation Center.

51.

Seale

(1999). The quality of qualitative research. London, England: Sage.

52.

Sharp

(2012). Donors of the future scan: 12 key trends and what they mean for the new giving landscape. Retrieved from https://d1sh7ow6wurp05.cloudfront.net/2donors.1418264965732.pdf

53.

Sinclair

(1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 219-237. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0003-Y

54.

Sulek

(2010). On the modern meaning of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 193-212. doi:10.1177/0899764009333052

55.

Timmermans

Tavory

(2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167-186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914

56.

Tomei

(2013). Foundations: Accountability and legitimacy. Voluntary Sector Review, 4, 403-413. doi:10.1332/204080513X13808065558251

57.

Tran

(2008). Corporate ethics: An end to the rhetorical interpretations of an endemic corruption. Social Responsibility Journal, 4, 63-81. doi:10.1108/17471110810856848

58.

Turnbull

(2007). Analysing network governance of public assets. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15, 1079-1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00632.x

59.

Tyler

(2013). Transparency in philanthropy: An analysis of accountability, fallacy, and volunteerism. Washington, DC: The Philanthropy Roundtable.

60.

Van Slyke

D. M

. (2006). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157-187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul012

61.

Ward

(2009). Private Ancillary Funds trustee handbook. Melbourne: Philanthropy Australia.

62.

Ward

(2012). Public Ancillary Funds (PuAF) trustee handbook. Melbourne: Philanthropy Australia.

63.

Weick

K. E.

(2007). The generative properties of richness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 14-19. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160637

64.

Wilson

(2015). 2015 Koda Capital non-profit sector review. Retrieved from https://kodacapital.com/insights

65.

Yin

R. K.

(2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.