Financial vulnerability of nonprofit organizations arising from governmental funding instability is examined using hazard analysis. Funding instability is characterized by time-at-risk, and vulnerability is expressed by hazard rate measuring the speed of nonprofit organizations closure. The analysis provides estimation of instantaneous probability of a nonprofit organization failure at a given point in time. Drawing on 2,660 Israeli nonprofit organizations, we found that the relationship between hazard rate and time-at-risk has an inverted U–shape curve; hazard rate increases with time-at-risk, reaches a maximum then descends.
AalenO. O. (1978). Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Annals of Statistics, 6, 701-726.
2.
AlterK.ShoemakerP.TuanM.EmersonJ. (2001, September). When is it time to say goodbye? Exit strategies and venture philanthropy funds. Virtue Ventures.( http://www.virtueventures.com)
3.
AltmanE. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 589-609.
4.
AnheierH. K. (2009). What kind of nonprofit sector, what kind of society? Comparative policy reflections. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1082-1092.
5.
BalcaenS.OogheH. (2006). 35 years of studies on business failure: An overview of the classic statistical methodologies and their related problems. The British Accounting Review, 38, 63-93.
6.
BauerJ.AgarwalV. (2014). Are hazard models superior to traditional bankruptcy prediction approaches? A comprehensive test. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 432-442.
7.
BeaverW. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 71-111.
8.
BorisE. T.LeonE.RoegerK. L.NikolovaM. (2010). National study of nonprofit-government contracting: State profiles. Centre on NPO’s and Philanthropy, The Urban Institute.
9.
BrocknerJ. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39-61.
10.
BrüderlJ.PreisendörferP.ZieglerR. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57, 227-242.
11.
BrüderlJ.SchüsslerR. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 530-547.
12.
CarrollG. R.HuoY. P. (1986). Organizational task and institutional environments in ecological perspective: Findings from the local newspaper industry. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 838-873.
13.
ChenC. A. (2014). Revisiting organizational age, inertia, and adaptability: Developing and testing a multi-stage model in the nonprofit sector. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27, 251-272.
14.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187-220.
15.
DuffieD.SaitaL.WangK. (2007). Multi-period corporate default prediction with stochastic covariates. Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 635-665.
16.
FernandezJ. (2008). Causes of dissolution among Spanish nonprofit associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 113-137.
17.
FichmanM.LevinthalD. A. (1991). Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationship. Academy of Management Review, 16, 442-468.
18.
GalnoorI. (2011). Public management in Israel: Development, structure, functions, and reforms. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GidronB.BarM.KatzH. (2004). The Israeli third sector: Between welfare state and civil society. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
20.
GreenleeJ.TrusselJ. (2000). Estimating the financial vulnerability of charitable organization. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 199-210.
21.
GrilliL.PivaE.LamastraC. R. (2010). Firm dissolution in high-tech sectors: An analysis of closure and M&A. Economics Letters, 109, 14-16.
22.
HagerM. (2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: A test of the Tuckman–Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 376-392.
23.
HagerM.GalaskiewiczJ.LarsonJ. (2004). Structural embeddedness and the liability of newness among nonprofit organization. Public Management Review, 6, 159-188.
24.
HallH.JonsonN. J.HaasN. J. (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization. American Sociological Review, 32, 903-912.
25.
HallidayT. C.PowellM. J.GranforsM. W. (1987). Minimalist organization: Vital events in state bar associations 1870-1930. American Sociological Review, 52, 456-471.
26.
HendersonA. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 281-314.
27.
KatzH.GidronB.LimorN. (2009). The third sector in Israel—Characteristics, structures and development policies. Civil Szemle, 6, 93-114.
28.
KleinJ. P.MoeschbergerM. L. (2003). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
29.
Le MensG.HannanM. T.PólosL. (2011). Founding conditions, learning, and organizational life chances: Age dependence revisited. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56, 95-126.
MandelkernR.ShalevM. (2010). Power and the ascendance of new economic policy ideas: Lessons from the 1980s crisis in Israel. World Politics, 62, 459-495.
32.
MinerA. S.AmburgeyT. L.StearnsT. M. (1990). Interorganizational linkages and population dynamics: Buffering and transformational shields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 689-713.
33.
NelsonW. (1972). Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure data. Technometrics, 14, 945-966.
34.
OertelS.WalgenbachP. (2011). A license to survive? The influence of master certificates on the survival chances of organization. European Management Review, 8, 33-45.
35.
OhlsonJ. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 109-131.
36.
RushtonM.BrooksA. C. (2007). Government funding of nonprofit organizations. In YoungD. R. (Ed.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practices (pp. 69-91). Plymouth, UK: AltaMira Press.
37.
ShumwayT. (2001). Forecasting bankruptcy more accurately: A simple hazard model. Journal of Business, 74, 101-124.
38.
SinghJ. V.HouseR. J.TuckerD. J. (1986). Organization change and organization mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 587-611.
39.
SmithS. R. (2008). The challenge of strengthening nonprofits and civil society. Public Administration Review, 68, 132-145.
40.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Social structures and organization. In MarchJ. G.(Ed.), Handbook of organization (pp.142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
41.
TrusselJ. (2002). Revisiting the prediction of financial vulnerability. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13, 17-31.
42.
TrusselJ.GreenleeJ. (2004). A financial rating system for charitable nonprofit organization. In PattonJ. M.CopleyP. A.ChanJ. L. (Eds.), Research in governmental and nonprofit accounting (Vol. 11, pp.28-105). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
43.
TuckmanH.ChangC. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.
44.
WangJ. L. (2005). Smoothing hazard rates. In ArmitageP.ColtonT. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of biostatistics (Vol. 7, pp. 4986-4997). New York, NY: John Wiley.
45.
WeissL. A. (1990). Bankruptcy resolution: Direct costs and violation of priority of claims. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 285-314.
46.
WollebaekD. (2009). Survival in local voluntary associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 19, 267-284.
47.
ZmijewskiM. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(Suppl.), 59-86.
