The purpose of this article is to provide a window into the earliest phase of nonprofit organizational formation. Using a sample of 91 nascent nonprofit entrepreneurs and a framework from the entrepreneurship literature identifying the vital capacities for new venture development success, this exploratory article examines the capacity endowments of nascent nonprofits. The results indicate that nascent nonprofits have rather well-developed venture ideas and also a good understanding of whom they will serve. However, few have developed programs or services ready to be implemented or established relations with real beneficiaries and/or payers. In addition, this research highlights differences in capacity between nascent nonprofit entrepreneurs with and without previous start-up experience.
AdizesI. (1988). Corporate lifecycles: How and why corporations grow and die and what to do about it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
BaierlR.GrichnikD.SpörrleM.WelpeI. M. (2014). Antecedents of social entrepreneurial intentions: The role of an individual’s general social appraisal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5, 123-145.
3.
BessG. (1998). A first stage organization life cycle study of six emerging nonprofit organizations in Los Angeles. Administration in Social Work, 22, 35-52.
4.
BoehmA. (2003). Managing the life cycle of a community project: A marketing approach. Administration in Social Work, 27, 19-37.
5.
BrushC. G.GreeneP. G.HartM. M. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64-78.
6.
BrushC. G.ManolovaT. S.EdelmanL. F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 547-566.
7.
CarmanJ. G.NesbitR. (2013). Founding new nonprofit organizations: Syndrome or symptom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 603-621.
8.
ChambréS. M.FattN. (2002). Beyond the liability of newness: Nonprofit organizations in an emerging policy domain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 502-524.
9.
CooperA. C.Gimeno-GasconF. J.WooC. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 371-395.
10.
DahlqvistJ.DavidssonP.WiklundJ. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: A replication and extension of the Cooper et al., study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 1-17.
11.
DavidssonP. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Springer.
12.
DavidssonP.HonigB. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301-331.
13.
DavidssonP.KlofstenM. (2003). The business platform: Developing an instrument to gauge and to assist the development of young firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 1-26.
14.
DelmarF.ShaneS. (2004). Legitimating first: Organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 385-410.
15.
DennisW. J.FernaldL. W. (2001). The chances of financial success (and loss) from small business ownership. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 75-83.
16.
DesaG. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 727-751.
17.
DruckerP. F. (1989). What business can learn from nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 67(4), 88-93.
18.
EisenhardtK. M.SchoonhovenC. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504-529.
19.
FrumkinP. (2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
GartnerW. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10, 696-706.
21.
GibbA.ScottM. (1986). Understanding small firms growth. In ScottM.GibbA.LewisT. (Eds.), Small business growth and development (pp. 81-104). London, England: Gower.
22.
GreinerL. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37-46.
23.
HagerM. A.GalaskiewiczJ.LarsonJ. A. (2004). Structural embeddedness and the liability of newness among nonprofit organizations. Public Management Review, 6, 159-188.
24.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
25.
HardingR.CowlingM. (2006). Social entrepreneurship monitor. London, England: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor.
26.
HarrisonT. D.LainczC. A. (2008). Entry and exit in the nonprofit sector. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), Article, 22.
27.
HasenfeldY.SchmidH. (1989). The life cycle of human service organizations: An administrative perspective. Administration in Social Work, 13, 243-269.
28.
HaughH. (2007). Community led social venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 161-182.
29.
HonigB.SamuelssonM. (2012). Planning and the entrepreneur: A longitudinal examination of nascent entrepreneurs in Sweden. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 365-388.
30.
JeavonsT. H.CnaanR. A. (1997). The formation, transitions, and evolution of small religious organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(Suppl.), 62-84.
31.
KatzJ.GartnerW. B. (1988). Properties of emerging organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13, 429-441.
32.
KlofstenM. (1994). Technology-based firms: Critical aspects of their early development. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 2, 535-557.
33.
KlofstenM. (2009). Affärsplattformen: Entreprenören och företagets första år [The Business Platform: The entrepreneur and the first year of the firm]. 3rd edition. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
34.
Koe Hwee NgaJ.ShamuganathanG. (2010). The influence of personality traits and demographic factors on social entrepreneurship start up intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 259-282.
35.
LesterD. L.ParnellJ. A.CarraherS. (2003). Organizational life cycle: A five-stage empirical scale. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 11, 339-354.
36.
MillerD.FriesenP. H. (1984). A longitudinal study of the corporate life cycle. Management Science, 30, 1161-1183.
37.
Miller-MillesenJ. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 521-547.
38.
MorrisM. H.WebbJ. W.FranklinR. J. (2011). Understanding the manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the nonprofit context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 947-971.
39.
PyneA. E.RobertsonD. (1997). Charities marketing—More focus on the beneficiary. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 2, 154-162.
40.
RenkoM. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 1045-1069.
41.
ReynoldsP. D. (2000). National panel study of U.S. business start-ups: Background and methodology. In KatzJ. A. (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 4, pp. 153-228). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
42.
ReynoldsP. D. (2007). Entrepreneurship in the United States. New York, NY: Springer.
43.
ReynoldsP. D.MillerB. (1992). New firm gestation: Conception, birth and implications for research. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 405-417.
44.
SineW. D.MitsuhashiH.KirschD. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121-132.
45.
StevensS. K. (2001). Nonprofit lifecycles: Stage-based wisdom for nonprofit capacity. Wayzata, MN: Stagewise Enterprises.
46.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Organization and social structure. In MarchJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
47.
TwerskyF.BuchananP.ThrelfallV. (2013). Listening to those who matter most, the beneficiaries. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11, 41-45.
48.
TwomblyE. (2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organizations in metropolitan areas?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 211-235.
49.
WiddingL. Ø. (2005). Building entrepreneurial knowledge reservoirs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12, 595-612.
50.
WiewelW.HunterA. (1985). The interorganizational network as a resource: A comparative case study of organizational genesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 482-496.
51.
YenckenJ.GillinM. (2006). Tech transfer section: The Klofsten business platform as a self-diagnostic tool for new technology-based small firms. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 8, 348-358.
52.
YoungD. R. (1983). If not for profit, for what?Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
