Securing financial sustainability through fundraising and other forms of financing is a critical issue for many nonprofit organizations. This article extends the benefits theory by adding beneficiary and organizational characteristics to it and examines how these characteristics affect revenue source composition. Based on a survey of International Nongovernmental Organizations (INGOs) with headquarters in Switzerland, the results quantitatively demonstrate a predictive relationship between programmatic and financial management: First, Swiss-based INGOs’ revenue sources rely heavily on income-generating revenue sources. Second, the efficacy of the benefits theory of nonprofit finance is demonstrated outside of the organizational context of U.S. local/national nonprofits. Third, INGOs’ organizational and beneficiary characteristics influence their revenue source composition. Fourth, the results demonstrate clear differences between revenue sources. Fifth, overall, the beneficiary field is the most influential of the proven characteristics in determining revenue source percentages.
AchleitnerA. K.Spiess-KnaflW.VolkS. (2014). The financing structure of social enterprises: Conflicts and implications. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 6, 85-99.
2.
AnheierH. K. (2000). Managing non-profit organisations: Towards a new approach. London, England: Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science.
3.
Banaszak-HollJ.ZinnJ. S.MorV. (1996). The impact of market and organizational characteristics on nursing care facility service innovation: A resource dependency perspective. Health Services Research, 31, 97-117.
4.
BeselK.WilliamsC. L.KlakJ. (2011). Nonprofit sustainability during times of uncertainty. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22, 53-65.
5.
BillisD. (1991). The roots of voluntary agencies: A question of choice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 57-69.
6.
BoliJ. (2006). International nongovernmental organizations. In PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 333-354). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
BrandsenT.Van de DonkW.PuttersK. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 749-765.
8.
CarrollD. A.StaterK. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 947-966.
9.
ChangC. F.TuckmanH. P. (1994). Revenue diversification among non-profits. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5, 273-290.
10.
ChangC. F.TuckmanH. P. (1996). The goods produced by nonprofit organizations. Public Finance Review, 24, 25-43.
11.
ChatterjeeS.HadiA. S.PriceB. (2000). Regression analysis by example (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
CrittendenW. F. (2000). Spinning straw into gold: The tenuous strategy, funding, and financial performance linkage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 164-182.
EversA. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6, 159-182.
16.
EversA. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737-748.
FischerR. L.WilskerA. L.YoungD. R. (2010). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 662-681.
19.
FroelichK. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246-268.
20.
GreeneW. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
GrønbjergK. A. (1991). How nonprofit human service organizations manage their funding sources: Key findings and policy implications. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2, 159-175.
22.
GrønbjergK. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
HelmigB.BärlocherC.von SchnurbeinG. (2009). Defining the nonprofit sector: Switzerland (Working paper of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project No. 46). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
24.
HelmigB.GmürM.BärlocherC.von SchnurbeinG.DegenB.NollertM.. . . SalamonL. (2011). The Swiss civil society sector in a comparative perspective (VMI Research Series, Vol. 6). Fribourg, Switzerland: VMI.
25.
KingmaB. R. (1993). Portfolio theory and nonprofit financial stability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 105-119.
26.
LeeT. (2010). The rise of international nongovernmental organizations: A top-down or bottom-up explanation?Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21, 393-416.
LindenbergM. (2001). Are we at the cutting edge or the blunt edge? Improving NGO organizational performance with private and public sector strategic management frameworks. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 247-251.
29.
Miller-MillesenJ. L. (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: A theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 521-547.
30.
MilliganK.SchöningM. (2011). Taking a realistic approach to impact investing: Observations from the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on social innovation. Innovations Quarterly, 6, 155-166.
31.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281-316.
32.
RehliF.JägerU. (2012). The governance of international nongovernmental organizations. How funding and volunteer involvement affect board nomination modes and stakeholder representation in international nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 587-612.
33.
SalamonL. M. (1999). The non-profit sector at a crossroads: The case of America. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10, 5-23.
34.
SalamonL. M.SokolowskiS. (2010, July). The social origins of civil society: Explaining variations in the size and structure of the global civil society sector. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference of the International Society for Third Sector Research, Istanbul, Turkey.
35.
SalamonL. M.SokolowskiS.AnheierH. K. (2000). Social origins of civil society: An overview (Working paper of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project No. 38). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies. Retrieved from http://www.adm-cf.com/jhu/pdfs/cnp_working_papers/cnp_wp38_social_origins_2000.pdf
36.
Spiess-KnaflW. (2012). Financing of social enterprises: A theoretical and empirical analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Technische Universität Münich, Germany.
37.
StoneM. M.HagerM. A.GriffinJ. J. (2001). Organizational characteristics and funding environments: A study of a population of United Way-affiliated nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 61, 276-289.
38.
TemkinT. (2001). Mama said never put all your eggs in one basket: Boards, strategic thinking, & the need for diversified revenue. Nonprofit World, 19, 8-12.
39.
TuckmanH. P.ChangC. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.
VerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.MilisK. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 5-32.
42.
WeisbrodB. A. (1998). The nonprofit mission and its financing. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 165-174.
43.
WilskerA. L.YoungD. R. (2010). How does program composition affect the revenues of nonprofit organizations? Investigating a benefits theory of nonprofit finance. Public Finance Review, 38, 193-216.
44.
YangA. H.LeeP.-Y.ChangT. Y. (2011). Does self-financing matter? Recalibrating the rationale of NGOs’ self-reliance in search of sustainability. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 4, 263-278.
45.
YoungD. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12, 139-157.
46.
YoungD. R. (2002). The influence of business on nonprofit organizations and the complexity of nonprofit accountability: Looking inside as well as outside. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 3-19.
47.
YoungD. R. (2007). Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
48.
YoungD. R.WilskerA. L.GrinsfelderM. C. (2010). Understanding the determinants of nonprofit income portfolios. Voluntary Sector Review, 1, 161-173.
