The aim of the present study is to provide a deeper understanding of how autonomy-supportive leadership affects volunteer motivation by taking volunteers’ individual differences into account. For this purpose, self-determination theory (SDT) was utilized because this conceptual framework considers both the social context (i.e., autonomy-supportive leadership) and individual differences (i.e., causality orientations) as antecedents of motivation. Causality orientations alter the way individuals perceive their social context as either autonomy-supportive or controlling (i.e., autonomy orientation or control orientation, respectively). Therefore, it is hypothesized that both types of causality orientations serve as moderators of the relationship between autonomy-supportive leadership and volunteer motivation. The hypotheses were tested on N = 1,979 volunteers. The results revealed that the relationship between autonomy-supportive leadership and volunteer motivation varied as a function of the strength of autonomy and control orientation. The importance of the moderating role of individual differences on volunteer motivation is discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, NY: Sage.
2.
AmabileT. M.DeJongW.LepperM. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 92-98. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.34.1.92
3.
BaardP. P.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045-2068. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
4.
BalaguerI.CastilloI.DudaJ. (2008). Autodeterminación. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 17, 123-139. ISSN:1132-239X
5.
BideeJ.VantilborghT.PepermansR.HuybrechtsG.WillemsJ.JegersM.HofmansJ. (2013). Autonomous motivation stimulates volunteers’ work effort: A self-determination theory approach to volunteerism. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24, 32-47. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9269-x
6.
BlackA. E.DeciE. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
7.
ChanD. L.LonsdaleC.HoP. Y.YungP. S.ChanK. M. (2009). Patient motivation and adherence to postsurgery rehabilitation exercise recommendations: The influence of physiotherapists’ autonomy-supportive behaviors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90, 1977-1982. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.05.024
8.
ClaryE. G.SnyderM.RidgeR. D.CopelandJ.StukasA. A.HaugenJ.MieneP. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1516-1530. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
10.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
11.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
12.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008a). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14-23. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
13.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2008b). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182-185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M.GagnéM.LeoneD. R.UsunovJ.KornazhevaB. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930-942. doi:10.1177/0146167201278002
15.
DeponteA. (2004). Linking motivation to personality: Causality orientations, motives and self-descriptions. European Journal of Personality, 18, 31-44. doi:10.1002/per.503
16.
FinkelsteinM. A. (2008). Predictors of volunteer time: The changing contributions of motive fulfillment and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 36, 1353-1363. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.10.1353
17.
GagnéM. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199-223. doi:10.1023/A:1025007614869
18.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
19.
GagnéM.ChemolliE.ForestJ.KoestnerR. (2008). A temporal analysis of the relation between organisational commitment and work motivation. Psychologica Belgica, 48, 219-241.
20.
GagnéM.ForestJ.GilbertM. H.AubéC.MorinE.MalorniA. (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628-646. doi:10.1177/0013164409355698
21.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.van den BroeckA.AspeliA.WangZ. (2012). Cross-cultural evidence for self-determination theory applied to the work domain. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
GagnéM.RyanR. M.BargmannK. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 372-390. doi:10.1080/714044203
23.
GrubeJ. A.PiliavinJ. A. (2000). Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1108-1119. doi:10.1177/01461672002611007
24.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L. (2011). Causality orientations moderate the undermining effect of rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 485-489. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.10.010
25.
HaggerM. S.ChatzisarantisN. L.CulverhouseT.BiddleS. J. (2003). The processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784-795. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.784
26.
HaivasS.HofmansJ.PepermansR. (2012). Self-determination theory as a framework for exploring the impact of the organizational context on volunteers’ motivation: A study of Romanian volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0899764011433041
27.
KwanB.HooperA.MagnanR.BryanA. (2011). A longitudinal diary study of the effects of causality orientations on exercise-related affect. Self and Identity, 10, 363-374. doi:10.1080/15298868.2010.534238
28.
LamC. F.GurlandS. T. (2008). Self-determined work motivation predicts job outcomes, but what predicts self-determined work motivation?Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1109-1115. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.002
29.
LeonardR.OnyxJ.Hayward-BrownH. (2004). Volunteer and coordinator perspectives on managing women volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 205-219. doi:10.1002/nml.62
30.
McElroyJ. C.MorrowP. C.RudeS. N. (2001). Turnover and organizational performance: A comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1294-1299. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1294
31.
MilletteV.GagnéM. (2008). Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: The impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 11-22. doi:10.1007/s11031-007-9079-4
32.
MusickM.WilsonJ. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
33.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.HaddadN. K. (1997). Client motivation for therapy scale: A measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 414-435. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6802_11
34.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
35.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
36.
RostK.WeibelA.OsterlohM. (2010). Good organizational design for bad motivational dispositions. Die Unternehmung, 64, 107-136. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1019765
37.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1-28. doi:10.1037/h0092976
38.
ScherhornG.HassH.HellenthalF.SeiboldS. (2010). Kausalitätsorientierungen [causality orientations]. In Glöckner-RistA. (Ed.), Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen [Collection of socio-scientific items and scales]. ZIS Version 14.00. Bonn, Germany: GESIS.
39.
SiemsenE.RothA.OliveiraP. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456-476. doi:10.1177/1094428109351241
40.
SnyderM.IckesW. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 883-947). New York, NY: Random House.
41.
SobusM. S. (1995). Mandating community service: Psychological implications of requiring prosocial behavior. Law & Psychology Review, 19, 153-182.
42.
SoenensB.BerzonskyM. D.VansteenkisteM.BeyersW.GoossensL. (2005). Identity styles and causality orientations: In search of the motivational underpinnings of the identity exploration process. European Journal of Personality, 19, 427-442. doi:10.1002/per.551
43.
StuderS.von SchnurbeinG. (2012). Organizational factors affecting volunteers: A literature review on volunteer coordination. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9268-y
StukasA. A.SnyderM.ClaryE. G. (1999). The effects of “mandatory volunteerism” on intentions to volunteer. Psychological Science, 10, 59-64. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00107
46.
VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.BlaisM. R.BriereN. M.SenecalC.VallieresE. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004025
47.
VansteenkisteM.NiemiecC. P.SoenensB. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16, 105-166. doi:10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A007
48.
VantilborghT.BideeJ.PepermansR.WillemsJ.HuybrechtsG.JegersM. (2011). A new deal for NPO governance and management: Implications for volunteers using psychological contract theory. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 639-657. doi:10.1007/s11266-011-9200-x
49.
VantilborghT.BideeJ.PepermansR.WillemsJ.HuybrechtsG.JegersM. (2012). Volunteers’ psychological contracts: Extending traditional views. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 1072-1091. doi:10.1177/0899764011427598
50.
WilliamsG. C.DeciE. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767-779. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.767
51.
WilliamsG. C.GrowV. M.FreedmanZ. R.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 115-126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.115
52.
WilsonJ. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 176-212. doi:10.1177/0899764011434558
53.
WilsonP. M.RodgersW. M. (2004). The relationship between perceived autonomy support, exercise regulations and behavioral intentions in women. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5, 229-242. doi:10.1016/S1469-0292(03)00003-7
54.
ZeldmanA.RyanR. M.FiscellaK. (2004). Motivation, autonomy support, and entity beliefs: Their role in methadone maintenance treatment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 675-696. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.5.675.50744
