Religious Affiliation,Religious Attendance,and Participation in Social Change Organizations

Abstract

How does religion affect an individual’s likelihood of volunteering for social change causes? This study reports on findings from an analysis of the 2005 wave of the COPPS supplement to the PSID to examine the effects of religious tradition (affiliation) and religious attendance (religiosity) on social change volunteering. We find that adherents to the more liberal Christian denominations—mainline Protestant and Catholic—are more likely to volunteer with social change organizations than are Evangelicals. We also find that adherents to other minority religions such as Judaism and Buddhism and individuals with no religious belief are all more likely to volunteer with social change organizations than are Evangelicals. We find a positive and significant relationship between religious attendance and social change volunteering, but find little difference in the effect of religious attendance on social change volunteering between Evangelicals and other religious traditions (except for Catholics).

Keywords

religious affiliation religious attendance social change volunteering for social change advocacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almond

G. A.

Verba

(1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Anderson

(1996). Political action and social integration. American Politics Quarterly, 24, 105-125.

Berger

P. L.

Neuhaus

R. J.

(1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

Berry

J. M.

Arons

D. F.

(2003). A voice for nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Beyerlein

Chaves

(2003). The political activities of religious congregations in the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 229-246.

Beyerlein

Hipp

J. R.

(2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53(1), 91-117.

Borgonovi

(2008). Divided we stand, united we fall: Religious pluralism, giving, and volunteering. American Sociological Review, 73, 105-128.

Boris

Mosher-Williams

(1998). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classifications, and data. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 488-506.

Bowen

(1999). Religion, participation, and charitable giving. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.

10.

Bucholtz

B. K.

(1998). Reflections on the role of nonprofit associations in a representative democracy. Cornell Journal of Law & Public Policy, 7, 555-603.

11.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Volunteering in the United States, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/volun.nr0.htm

12.

Campbell

D. E.

Yonish

S. J.

(2003). Religion and volunteering in America. In Smidt

(Ed.), Religion as social capital: Producing the common good (pp. 87-106). Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.

13.

Child

C. D.

Gronbjerg

K. A.

(2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 259-281

14.

Cnaan

Jones

K. H.

Dickin

Salomon

(2011). Estimating giving and volunteering: New ways to measure the phenomena. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 497-525.

15.

Greeley

(1997). The other civic America: Religion and social capital. American Prospect, 32, 68-73.

16.

Greeley

(2000). The Catholic imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.

17.

Guo

(2007). When government becomes the principal philanthropist: The effect of public funding on patterns of nonprofit governance. Public Administration Review, 67, 456-471.

18.

Guo

Peck

L. R.

(2009). Giving and getting: Charitable activity and welfare receipt. Administration & Society, 41, 600-627.

19.

Guo

Saxton

G. D.

(2010). Voice-in, voice-out: Constituent participation and nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 1(1), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.bepress.com/npf/vol1/iss1/5. doi:10.2202/2154-3348.1000

20.

Harris

F. C.

(1994). Something within: Religion as a mobilizer of African American political activism. Journal of Politics, 56, 42-68.

21.

Hoge

Zech

McNamara

Donahue

(1998). The value of volunteers as resources for congregations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37, 470-481.

22.

Jackson

Bachmeier

Wood

J. R.

Craft

(1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior? Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59-78.

23.

Jenkins

J. C.

(2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In Powell

W. W.

Steinberg

(Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 307-332). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

24.

Jones

K. S.

(2006). Giving and volunteering as distinctive forms of civic engagement: The role of community integration and personal resources in formal helping. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 249-266.

25.

Kunreuther

(2003). The changing of the guard: What generational differences tell us about social-change organizations. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 450-457.

26.

Lam

P.-Y.

(2002). As the flocks gather: How religion affects voluntary association participation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 405-422.

27.

LeRoux

Goerdel

H. T.

(2009). Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 514-536.

28.

Lincoln

C. E.

Mamiya

L. H.

1990. The black church in the African-American experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

29.

Loveland

M. T.

Jones-Stater

Park

J. Z.

(2008). Religion and the logic of the civic sphere: Religious tradition, religious practice, and voluntary association. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 4, Article 7.

30.

Marullo

Edwards

(2000). From charity to justice: The potential of university-community collaboration for social change. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 895-912.

31.

McVeigh

Smith

(1999). Who protests in America: An analysis of three political alternatives—Inaction, institutionalized politics, or protest. Sociological Forum, 14, 685-703.

32.

Mock

(1992). Congregational religious styles and orientation to society: Exploring our linear assumptions. Review of Religious Research, 34, 20-33.

33.

Musick

Wilson

(2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

34.

Paik

Navarre-Jackson

(2011). Social networks, recruitment, and volunteering: Are social capital effects conditional on recruitment? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 476-496.

35.

Park

J. Z.

Smith

(2000). “To whom much has been given . . .”: Religious capital and community voluntarism among churchgoing Protestants. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 39, 272-286.

36.

Pattillo-McCoy

(1998). Church culture as a strategy of action in the black community. American Sociological Review, 63, 767-784.

37.

Perks

Haan

(2011). Youth religious involvement and adult community participation: Do levels of youth religious involvement matter? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 107-129.

38.

Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. (2007). Religious composition of the U.S.: U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. Retrieved from http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/affiliations-all-traditions.pdf

39.

Putnam

R. D.

(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

40.

Putnam

R. D.

(1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.

41.

Reid

(1999). Nonprofit advocacy. In Boris

E. T.

Steuerle

C. E.

(Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Conflict or collaboration? (pp. 291-325). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

42.

Reid

(2000). Understanding the word “advocacy”: Context and use. In Reid

(Ed.), Structuring the inquiry into advocacy (pp. 1-9). Washington, DC: Urban Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/pdfs/structuring.pdf

43.

Rooney

P. M.

Steinberg

Schervish

P. G.

(2004). Methodology is destiny: The effect of survey prompts on reported levels of giving and volunteering. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 628-654.

44.

Saidel

(2002). Nonprofit organizations, political engagement, and public policy. In Reid

E. J.

Montilla

M. D.

(Eds.), Exploring organizations and advocacy (pp. 1-18). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

45.

Salamon

L. M.

(1995, March). Explaining nonprofit advocacy: An exploratory analysis. Paper presented at the Independent Sector Spring Research Forum, Alexandria, VA.

46.

Smidt

(1999). Religion and civic engagement: A comparative analysis. ANNALS, AAPSS, 565, 176-192.

47.

Smith

D. H.

(1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.

48.

Smith

T. W.

(2002). Religious diversity in America: The emergence of Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, and Others. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 577-585.

49.

Steensland

Park

J. Z.

Regnerus

M. D.

Robinson

L. D.

Wilcox

W. B.

Woodberry

R. D.

(2000). The measure of American religion: Toward improving the state of the art. Social Forces, 79, 291-318.

50.

Suárez

D. F.

Hwang

(2008). Civic engagement and nonprofit lobbying in California, 1998-2003. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 93-112.

51.

Tocqueville

(1956). Democracy in America. New York, NY: New American Library.

52.

Uslaner

E. M.

(2002). Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 239-254.

53.

Verba

Schlozman

K. L.

Brady

(1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

54.

Warren

M. E.

(2001). Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

55.

Webb

N. J.

Abzug

(2008). Do occupational group members vary in volunteering activity? Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 689-708.

56.

Wilhelm

M. O.

(2006). Practical considerations for choosing between Tobit and SLCS or CLAD estimators for censored regression models with an application to charitable giving. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70, 559-582.

57.

Wilhelm

M. O.

Brown

Rooney

P. M.

Steinberg

(2005). The center on philanthropy panel study [machine-readable data file]/Director and Principal Investigator, Mark O. Wilhelm; Coprincipal Investigators, Eleanor Brown, Patrick M. Rooney, and Richard Steinberg; Sponsored by Atlantic Philanthropies. In the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Wave XXXIV [machine-readable data file]/Director and Principal Investigator, Frank P. Stafford; Associate Director and Principal Investigator Robert F. Schoeni; Co-Principal Investigators, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, Katherine McGonagle, Wei-Jun Jean Yeung, and Robert B. Wallace. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

58.

Wilson

(2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.

59.

Wilson

Janoski

(1995). The contribution of religion to volunteer work. Sociology of Religion, 56, 137-152.

60.

Wilson

Musick

(1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociology Review, 62, 694-713.

61.

Wilson

Musick

(1999). The effects of volunteering on the volunteer. Law & Contemporary Problems, 62, 141-168.

62.

Wuthnow

(1991). Acts of compassion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

63.

Wuthnow

(1999). Mobilizing civic engagement: The changing impact of religious involvement. In Fiorina

Skocpol

(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 331-366). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

64.

Wuthnow

(2002). Beyond quiet influence? Possibilities for the Protestant Mainline. In Wuthnow

Evans

J. H.

(Eds.). The quiet hand of God: Faith-based activism and the public role of mainline Protestantism (pp. 381-403). Berkeley: University of California Press.