The current two studies, one testing college students and the other testing adults, showed nearly identical comparative effects of news features about either a nonprofit organization alone or about that same nonprofit but sponsored by a commercial company. There were two exemplars of nonprofit and commercial company pairings, and each was presented as “localized.” That is, the nonprofit and commercial company were located in the same city as the respondents or nonlocalized. Surprisingly, there was almost no indication that the commercial sponsor damaged positive responses, but there was some indication that under the localized condition, there was more negativity toward the commercial sponsorship. The elaboration likelihood model and attribution theory provide theoretical space for understanding these effects.
BaeJ.CameronG. (2007). Conditioning effect of prior reputation on perception of corporate giving. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 144-150.
2.
Becker-OlsenK. L.CudmoreB. A.HillR. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 59, 46-53.
3.
Calderon-MartinezA.Mas-RuisF. J.Nicolau-GonzalbezJ. L. (2005). Commercial and philanthropic sponsorship. International Journal of Market Research, 47(1), 75-99.
4.
CameronG. T. (1994). Does publicity outperform advertising? An experimental test of the third-party endorsement. Journal of Public Relations Research, 6, 185-207.
5.
CampbellM. C.KirmaniA. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69-83.
6.
CampbellM. C.KirmaniA. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the Persuasion Knowledge Model in consumer research. In HaugtvedtC. P.HerrP.KardesF. (Eds.), The Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 549-571). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CurtinP. A. (1999). Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 53-90.
8.
DeanD. H. (2002). Associating the corporation with a charitable event through sponsorship: Measuring the effects on corporate community relations, Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 77-87.
9.
DearingJ. W.RogersE. M.MeyerG.CaseyM. K.RaoN.CampoS. (1996). Social marketing and diffusion-based strategies for communicating with unique populations: HIV prevention in San Francisco. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 1, 342-364.
10.
DonnellyL. (2005, Winter). Proximity, not story format, improves news awareness among readers. Newspaper Research Journal, 26(1), 59-65.
11.
EllenP. S.MohrL. A.WebbD. J. (2000). Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix?Journal of Retailing, 76, 393-406.
12.
FriestadM.WrightP. (1994). The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1-31.
13.
GallagherK.FosterK.ParsonsJ. (2001). The medium is not the message: Advertising effectiveness and consumer evaluation in print ad on the Web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(4), 57-67.
14.
GrauS. L.FolseJ. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19-33.
15.
GrosenickG. (2005, November). Media discourse surrounding volunteerism: How the media frames (mis)represented volunteerism in selection of Canadian local and national print media. Paper presented at the 2005 ARNOVA Conference, Washington, DC.
16.
HaleM. (2007). Superficial friends: A content analysis of nonprofit and philanthropy coverage in nine major newspapers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 465-486.
17.
HeathL. (1984). Impact of newspaper crime reports on fear of crime: Multi-methodological investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 263-276.
18.
Heider (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York, NY: Wiley.
19.
HelmigB.SpraulK.TrempK. (2011). Replication studies in nonprofit research: A generalization and extension of findings regarding the media publicity of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 360-385.
20.
KotlerP.ZaltmanG. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3-12.
21.
Liston-HeyesC.LiuG. (2010). Cause-related marketing in the retail and finance sectors: An exploratory study of the determinants of cause selection and nonprofit alliances. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 77-101.
22.
McLeodJ. M.PanZ.RucinskiD. M. (1988). Processing news and advertising: Same strategies and same effects?Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Portland, OR.
23.
MooreD. J.MowenJ. C.ReardonR. (1994). Multiple sources in advertising appeals: When product endorsers are paid by the advertising sponsor. Journal of Advertising, 22(Summer), 234-243.
24.
OhanianR. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness, Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
25.
QiuQ.CameronG. T. (2008).Building a media agenda on prosocial issues: What factors are at work to influence effectiveness?Saarbruecken, Germany:VDM Verlag.
26.
RifonN. J.ChoiS. M.TrimbleC. S.LiH. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 29-42.
27.
RodgersS. (2005). An examination of advertising credibility and skepticism in five different media using the Persuasion Knowledge Model. American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings.
28.
RodgersS.LimJ.BaeJ. (2005). Testing the line between news and advertising: The effects of sponsor association on the content and credibility of four e-newspapers. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York City, NY.
29.
SalmonC. T.ReidL. N.PokrywcznskiJ.WillettR.W. (1985). The effectiveness of advocacy advertising relative to news coverage. Communication Research, 12, 546–567.
30.
SchmidtT. L.HitchonJ. C. (1999). When advertising and public relations converge: An application of schema theory to the persuasive impact of alignment ads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 433-455.
31.
SparkmanR. M.Jr. (1982). The discounting principle in the perception of advertising. In: MitchellA. (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (vol. 9, pp., 277-280), Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.
32.
SpeedR.ThompsonP. (2000). Determinants of sports sponsorship response. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 226-238.
StraughanD.BleskeG. L.ZhaoX. (1996). Modeling format and source effects of an advocacy message. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 135-146.
35.
SzykmanL. R.BloomP. N.BlazingJ. (2004). Does corporate sponsorship of a socially-oriented message make a difference? An investigation of the effects of sponsorship identity on responses to an anti-drinking and driving message. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1/2), 13-20.
36.
WebbD. J.MohrL. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17, 226-238.
37.
WilcoxD. L.CameronG. T. (2008). Public relations: Strategies and tactics (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
ZhangJ.SwansonD. (2006). Media portrayal of corporate social responsibilities. Public Relations Quarterly, 51(2), 13-17.
