Private nonprofit organizations (NPO) involved in publically funded welfare programs face the challenge of maintaining autonomy in their strategic decision-making processes. In this article we study the extent to which NPO managers perceive this autonomy vis-à-vis government in defining the NPO’s mission, their working procedures, the target groups to be served and the results to be achieved. Empirical evidence is taken from a large-N sample of 255 NPOs engaged in social welfare provision in Belgium. Our findings suggest that public resource dependence does have a negative impact on the perception of NPOs about the level of organizational autonomy. Still, we will argue that, when looking at the relative share of public income in the NPO’s total budget, the nature and intensity of the consultation process between government and NPO and some measures of organizational capacity, this picture is less black and white than presumed.
AnheierL. (2005). The nonprofit sector: Approaches, management, policy. New York, NY: Routlegde.
2.
AnheierH. K.ToeplerS.SokolowskiW. (1997). The implications of government funding for non-profit organizations: Three propositions. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(3), 190-213.
3.
BorisE.SteuerleC. (1999). Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
4.
BoyleR.ButlerM. (2003). Autonomy versus accountability: Managing government funding of voluntary and community organizations. Dublin, Ireland: The Institute of Public Administration.
5.
CandlerG.DumontG. (2010). A non-profit accountability framework. Canadian Public Administration, 53(2), 259-279.
6.
ChavesM.GalaskiewiczJ.StephensL. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofit’s political activity?American Sociological Review, 69(2), 292-316.
7.
ChildC. D.GronbjergK. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259-281.
8.
ChristensenR.EbrahimA. (2006). How does accountability affect mission. The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(2), 195-209.
9.
ElbersW.SchulpenL. (2011). Decision making in partnerships for development: Explaining the influence of local partners. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 795-812.
10.
FroelichK. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246-268.
11.
GazleyB. (2010). Why not partner with local government? Nonprofit managerial perceptions of collaborative disadvantage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 51-76.
12.
Gjems-OnstadO. (1990). The independence of voluntary organizations in a social democracy: Governmental influences in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19(4), 393-407.
13.
GronbjergK. (1991). Managing grants and contracts: The case of four nonprofit social service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 5-24.
14.
GronbjergK. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social service and community development organizations. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
HuxhamC. (1995). Pursuing collaborative advantage. Journal of the Operational Research Survey, 44(6), 599-611.
16.
JungK.MoonM. J. (2007). The double-edged sword of public-resource dependence: The impact of public resources on autonomy and legitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations. Policy Studies Journal, 35(2), 205-226.
17.
KearnsL. (1996). Managing for accountability: Preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
KirkS.KutchinsH. (1992). Diagnosis and uncertainty in mental health organizations. In HasenfeldY. (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 163-183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
LipskeyM.SmithS. (1990). Nonprofit organizations, government and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 625-648.
20.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.
21.
NeverB. (2011). Understanding constraints on nonprofit leadership tactics in times of recession. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 990-1004.
22.
Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 5-21.
23.
NikolicS.KoontzT. (2007). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 441-463.
24.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure and 3rd-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare-state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1-2), 29-49.
26.
SalamonL. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
SalamonL.SokolowskiA., & Associates. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Bloomfield, IN: Kumarian Press.
28.
SchmidH.BarM.NirelR. (2008). Advocacy activities in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(4), 581-602.
29.
SmithL.LipskyM. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
SnavelyK.DesaiU. (2001). Mapping local government-nongovernmental organization interactions: A conceptual framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 245-263.
31.
StaintonT. (1994). Autonomy and social policy: Rights, mental handicap and community care. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
32.
StoneM. M. (1989). Planning as strategy in nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 297-315.
33.
StoneM. M.BigelowB.CrittendenW. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations: Synthesis, analysis, and future directions. Administration & Society, 31(3), 378-423.
34.
ToberJ. (1991). Strategic planning in organizations and environments. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Non-Organizations.
35.
ToeplerS. (2010). Government funding policies. In SeamanB.YoungD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on nonprofit economics and management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
36.
VerbruggenS.ChristiaensJ.MilisK. (2011). Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 5-32.
37.
VerhoestK.RonessP. G.VerschuereB.RubecksenK.Muiris MacCarthaigK. (2010). Autonomy and control of state agencies: Comparing states and agencies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
WolchJ. (1990). Planning as crisis management: An analysis of London’s voluntary sector. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Non-Profit Organizations.
