Traditional sociological insights assume that cities are characterized by lower levels of voluntary engagement as it is expected that community size and population density are negatively associated with network and mobilization opportunities. Others, however, argue that cities allow for the formation of different networks that are no longer based on ascribed personal characteristics. The authors analyze voluntary association membership in Belgium, based on the “Social Cohesion Indicators in Flanders” dataset (n = 2,080 respondents, sampled in 40 communities). The analysis shows that neither population density nor community size have an effect on scope or intensity of participation in voluntary associations. Only two forms of associations are negatively related to population density. Their results therefore do not support the hypothesis of a rural-urban divide in participation in voluntary associations. They speculate how future research could take into account different sorts of voluntary associations when investigating the rural-urban divide and include other measurements of participation.
AgrestiA. (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley.
2.
AhlbrandtR. S. (1984). Neighborhoods, people, and community. New York, NY: Plenum.
3.
AndersonM. (2009). Beyond membership: A sense of community and political behavior. Political Behavior, 31, 609-627.
4.
AndrewsR. (2009). Civic engagement, ethnic heterogeneity, and social capital in urban areas. Urban Affairs Review, 44, 428-440.
5.
AshworthJ.HeyndelsB. (2006). Government fragmentation and budgetary policy in “good” and “bad” times in Flemish municipalities. Economics & Politics, 17, 245-263.
6.
BekkersR. (2005). Participation in voluntary associations: Relations with resources, personality, and political values. Political Psychology, 26, 439-454.
7.
BellW.ForceM. T. (1956a). Social-structure and participation in different types of formal associations. Social Forces, 34, 345-350.
8.
BellW.ForceM. T. (1956b). Urban neighborhood types and participation in formal associations. American Sociological Review, 21(1), 25-34.
9.
BillietJ. (Ed.). (1988). Tussen bescherming en verovering.Sociologen en historici over zuilvorming [Between protection and conquest. Sociologen historians and column formation]. Leuven, Belgium: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
10.
BursikR. J. (1988). Delinquency rates as a source of ecological change. In ByrneJ. M.SampsonR. J.The Social Ecology of Crime, 63-76, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
11.
ChaskinR. J. (1994). Defining neighborhood: History, theory, and practice. Report for the Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
12.
CurtisJ. E.GrabbE. G.BaerD. E. (1992). Voluntary association membership in 15 countries. A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 57, 139-152.
13.
DahlE.FlottenT.LorentzenT. (2008). Poverty dynamics and social exclusion: An analysis of Norwegian panel data. Journal of Social Policies, 37, 231-249.
14.
DaltonR. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 58, 76-98.
15.
DeschouwerK. (2009). The politics of Belgium. Governing a divided society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
DurkheimE. (1993). Le suicide [suicide]. Paris, France: PUF. (Original work published 1897)
17.
FischerC. (1975a). The effect of urban life on traditional values. Social Forces, 53, 420-432.
18.
FischerC. (1975b). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80, 1319-1341.
19.
FischerC. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20.
FischerC. (1995). The subcultural theory of urbanism: A twentieth-year assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 543-577.
21.
GansH. (1962). The urban villagers. New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
HaddadM. A. (2004). Community determinates of volunteer participation and the promotion of civic health: The case of Japan [Special issue]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3), 8S-31S.
23.
HoogheM. (2003a). Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 47-69.
24.
HoogheM. (2003b). Why should we be bowling alone? Cross-sectional results from a Belgian survey on civic participation. Voluntas, 14(1), 41-59.
25.
HoogheM.StolleD. (Eds.). (2003). Generating social capital: Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HoogheM.VanhoutteB.BircanT. (2009). Technical report for the social cohesion survey Flanders 2009 (SCIF 2009). Leuven, Belgium: University Leuven.
27.
HuckfeldtR.SpragueJ. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GraddyE.WangL. (2008). Community foundation development and social capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 392-412.
29.
GreifM. J. (2009). Neighborhood attachment in the multiethnic metropolis: The intersection of race, nativity, and racial composition. City and Community, 8(1), 27-45.
30.
KangN.KwakN. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation—Individual length of residence, neighborhood residential stability, and their interactive effects with media use. Communication Research, 30(1), 80-106.
31.
KelleherC.LoweryD. (2009). Central city size, metropolitan institutions and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 59-92.
32.
KennedyB. P.KawachiI.Prothrow-StithD.LochnerK.GuptaV. (1998). Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Social Science and Medicine, 47(1), 7-17.
33.
KingG. (1989). Variance specification in event count models: From restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 762-784.
34.
LandK. C.McCallP. L.NaginD. S. (1996). A comparison of poisson, negative binomial, and semiparametric mixed poisson regression models with empirical applications to criminal careers data. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 387-442.
35.
LataneBDarleyJ. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
36.
LemonM.PalisiB. JJacobsonP. E. (1972). Dominant statuses and involvement in formal voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1(2), 30-42.
37.
LevineR. V.MartinezT. S.BraseG.SorensonK. (1994). Helping in 36 United-States Cities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(1), 69-82.
38.
LindströmM. (2005). Ethnic differences in social participation and social capital in Malmö, Sweden: A population-based study. Social Science and Medicine, 60, 1527-1546.
39.
LindströmM.MerloJ.ÖstergrenP. O. (2002). Individual and neighbourhood determinants of social participation and social capital. A multilevel analysis of the city of Malmö, Sweden. Social Science and Medicine, 54,1779-1791.
40.
OliverE. (2000). City size and civic involvement in Metropolitan America, American Political Science Review, 94, 361-373.
41.
OliverE. (2001). Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
OlsonM. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
PaxtonP. (2007). Association memberships and generalized trust: A multilevel model across 31 countries. Social Forces, 86(1), 47-76.
44.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
45.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CongdonR. (2004). HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
46.
RemmerK. (2010). Political scale and electoral turnout: Evidence from the less industrialized world. Comparative Political Studies, 43, 275-303.
47.
RoseL. (2002). Municipal size and local nonelectoral participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 20, 829-851.
48.
RotoloT. (1999). Trends in voluntary association participation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 199-212.
49.
SampsonR. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model, American Sociological Review, 53, 766-779.
50.
SkocpolT. (2003). Diminished democracy. From membership to management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
51.
SmithD. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering. A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
52.
SnijdersT.BoskerR. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London, UK: SAGE.
53.
Stadelmann-SteffenI.FreitagM. (2011). Making civil society work: Models of democracy and their impact on civic engagement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 526-551.
54.
SteblayN. M. (1987). Helping behavior in rural and urban environments: Ameta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 346-356.
55.
StollM. A. (2001). Race, neighborhood poverty, and participation in voluntary associations. Sociological Forum, 16, 529-557.
56.
SundeenR. A. (1992). Differences in personal goals and attitudes among volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 271-291.
57.
TaniguchiH. (2008). Who are volunteers in Japan?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 161-179.
58.
TaylorR. B. (1996). Neighborhood responses to disorder and local attachments: The Systemic model of attachment, social disorganization, and neighborhood use value. Sociological Forum, 11(1), 41-74.
59.
ThemudoN. S. (2009). Gender and the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 663-683.
60.
TönniesF. (1979). Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft: Grundbegriffe der reinen soziologie [Community and Society: Basic concepts of pure sociology]. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Original work published 1898)
61.
TorpeL. (2003). Democracy and associations in Denmark: Changing relationships between individuals and associations?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 329-343.
62.
Van der HaegenH.Van HeckeE.JuchtmansG. (1996). De Belgische stadsgewesten 1991 [Belgian urban regions 1991]. Brussels, Belgium: National Institute for Statistics.
63.
Van DoorslaerE.MasseriaC. (2004). Income-related inequalities in the use of medical care in 21 OECD Countries (Health Working Papers No. 14/2004). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
64.
Van IngenE.DekkerP. (2011). Changes in the determinants of volunteering: Participation and time investment between 1975 and 2005 in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 682-702.
65.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality. Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66.
WallaceC.PichlerF. (2009). More participation, happier society? A comparative study of civil society and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 93, 255-274.
67.
WhiteM.WhiteL. (1962). The intellectual versus the city. New York, NY: Mentor.
68.
WilkinsonR. G. (1998). Unhealthy societies. The afflictions of inequality. London, UK: Routledge.
69.
WilkinsonR. G.PickettK. E. (2009). Income inequality and social dysfunction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 493-511.
70.
WirthL. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1-24.
71.
WollebaekD.SelleP. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 32-61.
72.
WollebaekD.StrømsnesK. (2007). Voluntary associations, trust, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 249-263.
