This article presents results of an embedded comparative case study about central strategists realizing strategies in a large nonprofit organization characterized by decentralized and inverse structures. Inverse structures lead to a paradoxical situation in which strategists of a nonprofit’s central office have to make deliberate decisions about resource allocation while having no authority over the implementation of strategic decisions. Legitimation is a crucial element in the creation and realization of new strategies. The authors thus ask the question: How do strategists achieve the legitimation and realization of strategies without formal authority? The findings show that, in all of the observed four strategies—also in the process of formalization—strategists of the central office built on emergent strategies that they supported in their legitimation by three steps: Strategists supported the strategy’s negotiability (pragmatic legitimation), continued supporting its reasonability (moral legitimation), and finally its comprehensibility (cognitive legitimation).
AnthonyR. N.YoungD. W. (2003). Management control in nonprofit organizations (7th ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
5.
AntonioT. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15, 243-263.
6.
BakerD. (2007). Strategic change management in public sector organisations: A guide for public sector and not-for-profit organizations. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.
7.
BermanE. M. (2006). Productivity in public and nonprofit organizations. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
BowerJ. L. (1977). Effective public management. Harvard Business Review, 55, 131-140.
10.
BurgelmanR. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223-244.
11.
ChiaR. (2000). Discourse analysis as organizational analysis. Organization, 7, 513-518.
12.
CourtneyR. (2002). Strategic management for voluntary nonprofit organizations. London: Routledge.
13.
CourtneyR.MarnochG.WilliamsonA. (2006). The adoption of strategic management by third sector organizations: Findings from a census of organizations in Northern Ireland. Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen [Journal for Public and Nonprofit Services], 34, 8-21.
14.
DruckerP. F. (1990). Managing the non-profit organization. Practices and principles. New York: HarperCollins.
15.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
16.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32.
17.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In CliffordG. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
18.
GinsbergA.AbrahamsonE. (2007). Champions of change and strategy shifts: The role of internal and external change advocates. Journal of Management Studies, 28, 173-190.
19.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
20.
GlynnM. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11, 285-298.
21.
GraemeL.LesH. (2004). Sociétés Cooératives d’Intérêt Collectiv [The arrival of social enterprise within the French social economy]. Voluntas, 15, 265-286.
GuthW. D.MacmillanI. C. (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 313-327.
24.
HaddadT. (2003). Instrumente für das strategische Management in NPOs [Instruments for strategic nonprofit management]. In EschenbachR.HorakC. (Eds.), Führung der Nonprofit Organisation. Bewährte Instrumente im praktischen Einsatz [Leading nonprofit organizations. Approved instruments in action] (pp. 13-66). Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.
25.
HardyC. (2004). Scaling up and bearing down in discourse analysis: Questions regarding textual agencies and their context. Organization, 11, 415-425.
26.
HelmigB.JegersM.LapsleyI. (2004). Challenges in managing nonprofit organizations: A research overview. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15, 101-116.
27.
HendryJ.SeidlD. (2003). The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 175-196.
28.
HoffmannE. (2006). The ironic value of loyalty dispute resolution strategies in worker cooperatives and conventional organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17, 163-177.
29.
KieserA. (1994). Why organization theory needs historical analyses—and how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5, 608-620.
30.
KoteenJ. (1997). Strategic management in public and nonprofit organizations: Thinking and acting strategically on public concerns. West Port, CT: Greenwood.
MancinoA.ThomasA. (2005). An Italian pattern of social enterprise: The social cooperative. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15, 357-369.
33.
MartinE.MillerJ. (2003). NGOs and the development of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Understanding large-scale interorganizational systems. Voluntas, 14, 145-166.
34.
MintzbergH. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper and Row.
35.
MooreM. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organization. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 183-204.
36.
MorrisonB.SalipanteP. (2007). Governance for broadened accountability: Blending deliberate and emergent strategizing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 195-217.
37.
NeilsenE. H.RaoM. V. H. (1987). The strategy-legitimacy nexus: A thick description. Academy of Management Review, 12, 523-533.
38.
NormannR. (1977). Management for growth. New York: John Wiley.
39.
OdomR. Y.BoxxW. R. (1988). Environment, planning processes, and organizational performance of churches. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 197-205.
ParsonsE.BroadbridgeA. (2004). Managing change in nonprofit organizations: Insights from the UK charity retail sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15, 227-242.
42.
PettigrewA. (1985). The awakening giant. Continuity and change in ICI. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
43.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
QuinnJ. B. (1980). Strategies for change. Logical incrementalism. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
45.
ReedM. E. (1996). Expert power and control in late modernity: An empirical review and theoretical synthesis. Organization Studies, 17, 573-597.
46.
RegnérP. (2003). Strategy creation in the periphery: Inductive versus deductive strategy making. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 57-82.
47.
RogersG.FinleyD. S.GallowayJ. R. (2001). Strategic planning in social service organizations. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Scholars Press.
48.
Saxon-HarroldS. K. E. (1990). Competition, resources, and strategy in the British nonprofit sector. In AnheierH. K.SeibelW. (Eds.), The third sector comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
49.
StoneM. M. (1989). Planning strategy in nonprofit organizations: An exploratory study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 297-315.
50.
StoneM. M.BigelowB.CrittendenW. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations. Administration & Society, 31, 378-423.
51.
StoneM. M.CrittendenW. (1993). A guide to journal articles on strategic management in nonprofit organizations, 1977 to 1992. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 4, 193-213.
52.
StraussA. L. (2003). Qualitative analysis for social scientists (14th ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
