This article evaluates the influence of different models of democracy on individual volunteering in associations and organizations. More precisely, we investigate the extent to which the degree of liberal and participatory conceptions of democracy respectively shapes the conditions under which voluntary engagement thrives. We apply multilevel analysis—a method that corresponds well to the central hypothesis of institutional approaches and is most suitable for modeling the relationship between the democratic context and individual volunteering. We show that both a representative conception of democracy, as well as strong direct democracy, leads to advantageous conditions for civic engagement. In contrast, if the two models of democracy are combined, the two different logics of the democratic process disturb one another, resulting in less voluntary engagement.
Anduiza, E., Font, J., Mas, P., & De Maya, S. (2008). The electoral impact of direct-democratic practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32, 1-19.
2.
Anheier, H.K., & Salamon, L.M. ( 1999). Volunteering in cross-national perspective: Initial comparisons . Law and Contemporary Problems, 62(4), 43-65.
3.
Barber, B.R. ( 1998). A passion for democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Boehmke, F.J. ( 2002). The effect of direct democracy on the size and diversity of state interest group populations. Journal of Politics, 64, 827-844.
5.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. ( 2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 371-390.
6.
Brennan G., & Hamlin, A. ( 1999). On political representation. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 109-127.
7.
Browne, W.J., & Draper, D. ( 2006). A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 473-514.
8.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Suppl.), S95-S120.
9.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
10.
Curtis, J.E., Baer, D.E., & Grabb, E.G. ( 2001). Nations of joiners: Explaining voluntary association membership in democratic societies. American Sociological Review, 66, 783-805.
11.
Curtis, J.E., Grabb, E.G., & Baer, D.E. ( 1992). Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 57, 139-152.
12.
Dahl, R.A. ( 1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
13.
Eisinger, P.K. ( 1973). The conditions of protest behaviour inAmerican cities. American Political Science Review, 67(1), 11-28.
14.
Elster, J. ( 1998). A plea for mechanism. In: P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanism: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 45-73). Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Feld, L.P., & Kirchgässner, G. (2001). The political economy of direct legislation: Direct democracy and local decision-making. Economic Policy, 16, 329-367.
16.
Feld, L.P., & Matsusaka, J.G. (2003). Budget referendums and government spending: Evidence from Swiss cantons. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2703-2724.
17.
Feld, L.P., & Savioz, M.R. ( 1997). Direct democracy matters for economic performance: An empirical investigation. Kyklos, 50, 507-538.
18.
Foley, M.W., & Edwards, B. ( 1996). The paradox of civil society. Journal of Democracy, 7, 8-52.
19.
Freitag, M. ( 2006). Bowling the state back in: Political institutions and the creation of social capital. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 123-152.
Fukuyama, F. ( 2000). The great disruption. Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: Free Press.
22.
Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. ( 1996). Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A159, 505-513.
23.
Hall, P.A., & Taylor, R.C.R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Köln, Germany: Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
24.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Gidron, B. ( 2005). Understanding multi-purpose hybrid voluntary organizations: The contributions of theories on civil society, social movements and non-profit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 97-112.
25.
Hofstede, G. ( 2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. London : Sage.
26.
Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. ( 2003). Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective. New York: Palgrave.
27.
Immergut, E. ( 1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society, 26, 5-34.
28.
Jones, K. ( 1997). Multilevel approaches to modelling contextuality. From nuisance to substance in the analysis of voting behaviour. In: G. P. Westert & N. V. René (Eds.), Places and people. Multilevel modelling in geographical research (pp. 19-43). Utrecht: KNAG/Netherlands Geographical Studies.
29.
Kaiser, A. ( 1997). Types of democracy: From classical to new institutionalism . Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9, 419-444.
30.
Kanazawa, S. ( 1998). A possible solution to the paradox of voter turnout. Journal of Politics, 60, 974-995.
31.
Kanazawa, S. ( 2000). A new solution to the collective action problem: The paradox of voter turnout. American Sociological Review, 65, 433-442.
32.
Kornberg, A., & Clarke, H.D. ( 1992). Citizens and community. Political support in a representative democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Knüsel, R. ( 1994). Plurilinguism et enjeux politique. Les minorités ethnolinguistiques autochtones à territoire: l’exemple du cas helvétique [Ethnolinguistic indigenous minorities: The example of the Swiss case]. Lausanne, Switzerland: Payot.
34.
Kriesi, H., & Baglioni, S. ( 2003). Putting local associations into their context. Preliminary results from a Swiss study of local associations. Swiss Political Science Review, 9, 1-34.
35.
Kriesi, H., & Wisler, D. ( 1996). Social movements and direct democracy in Switzerland . European Journal of Political Research, 30, 19-40.
36.
Ladner, A. ( 2007). Das Alter der Parlamentarierinnen und Parlamentarier in den kantonalen Parlamenten [The age of women parliamentarians and parliamentarians in the Cantonal parliaments] (Working Paper No. l’IDHEAP 1/2007). Chavannes-près-Renens, Switzerland: IDHEAP.
37.
Ladner, A. ( 1994). Finanzkompetenzen der Gemeinden-ein Überblick über die Praxis [Financial powers of municipalities, an overview of the practice] . In: F. Eng, A. Glatthard, & B. Koenig (Eds.), Finanzföderalismus [Fiscal Federalism] (pp. 64-85). Zürich , Switzerland: Emissionszentrale der Schweizer Gemeinden .
38.
Ladner, A. ( 1991). Direkte Demokratie auf kommunaler Ebene-Die Beteiligung an Gemeindeversammlungen. Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Politische Wissenschaft [Direct democracy at the local level, the participation at community meetings. Swiss Yearbook of Political Science] (pp. 63-68). Bern, Switzerland: Paul Haupt.
39.
Ladner, A., & Brändle, M. (1999). Does direct democracy matter for political parties? Party Politics, 5, 283-302.
40.
Lafitte, P. ( 1987). Les institutions de la démocratie directe en Suisse au niveau local [The institutions of direct democracy in Switzerland at the local level]. Lausanne, Switzerland: IDHEAP.
41.
Levi, M. ( 1996). Social and Unsocial Capital. A Review Essay of Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work. Politics & Society , 24, 45-55.
42.
Lijphart, A. ( 1999). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. London: Yale University Press.
43.
Linder, W. ( 2005). Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven [Swiss democracy. Institutions, processes, perspectives] (2nd ed.). Bern, Switzerland: Paul Haupt.
44.
Lowndes, V., & Wilson, D. ( 2001). Social capital and local governance: Exploring the institutional design variable. Political Studies, 49, 629-647.
45.
Matsusaka, J.G. ( 2005). Direct democracy works. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 185-206.
46.
Matsusaka, J.G. ( 2004). For the many or the few: The initiative, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47.
Mettler, S. ( 2002). Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the G. I. Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review, 96, 351-365.
48.
Mill, J.S. ( 1957) Autobiography. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Original work published 1873)
49.
Offe, C. ( 1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42-87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Olson, M. ( 1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (Rev ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1965 )
51.
Opp, K.-D. ( 1996). Gesellschaftliche Krisen, Gelegenheitsstrukturen oder rationales Handeln? Ein kritischer Theorienvergleich von Erklärungen politischen Protests [Social crises, opportunity structures and rational action? A critical comparison of theoretical explanations of political protest]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25, 223-242.
52.
Paxton, P. ( 2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship . American Sociological Review, 6, 254-277.
53.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000), Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon and Schuster.
54.
Putnam, R.D. ( 1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. ( 2003). Introduction: Social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2, 1-26.
56.
Sartori, G. ( 1987). Theory of democracy revisited, Chatham NY: Chatham House.
57.
Scarrow, S.E. ( 2001). Direct democracy and the institutional change. A comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 651-665.
58.
Schaltegger, C.A., & Feld, L.P. ( 2001). On government centralization and budget referendums: Evidence from Switzerland (CESifo Working Paper, No. 615). Munich, Germany: University of Munich.
59.
Scheepers, P., & Te Grotenhuis, M. (2005). Who cares for the poor in Europe? Micro and macro determinants for alleviating poverty in 15European countries. European Sociological Review, 21, 453-465.
Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement. Voluntary association membership, comparative perspective . American Sociological Review, 66, 806-828.
62.
Skocpol, T., Marshall, G., & Munson, Z. ( 2000). A nation of organizers. The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94, 527-561.
63.
Skocpol, T. ( 1996, March-April 1996). Unravelling from above . American Prospect, No. 25.
64.
Stadelmann-Steffen, I., Freitag, M., & Bühlmann, M. (2007). Freiwilligen-Monitor Schweiz 2007 [Swiss volunteering survey]. Zürich, Switzerland: Seismo.
65.
Steenbergen, M.R., & Jones, B.S. ( 2002). Modelling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 218-237.
66.
Stolle, D. ( 2003). The sources of social capital. In: M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 19-42). New York: Palgrave.
67.
Stutzer, A. ( 1999). Demokratieindizes für die Kantone der Schweiz [Democracy indices for the cantons of Switzerland] (Working Paper No. 23). Zurich, Switzerland: Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.
68.
Vatter, A. ( 2002). Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich. Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen [Cantonal democracies in comparison. Emergence of reasons, interactions and effects of political institutions in the Swiss cantons]. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
69.
Vatter, A., & Freitag, M. ( 2007). The contradictory effects of consensus democracy on the size of government: Evidence from the Swiss Cantons. British Journal for Political Science, 37, 359-367.
70.
Vatter, A., Freitag, M., Müller, C., Bühlmann, M., & Steffen, I. ( 2006). Comparative cantonal data set (CCDS).
71.
Warner, M. ( 1999). Social capital construction and the role of the State . Rural Sociology, 64, 373-393.
72.
Wilson, J. ( 2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology , 26, 215-240.
73.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. ( 1997). Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
