Although awareness of the involvement of human service nonprofits (HSNPs) in policy advocacy has grown, scholars continue to know little about how they actually carry out their advocacy work. This study uses a large, representative survey of HSNPs to answer two primary research questions: First, what kinds of advocacy tactics do HSNPs participate in most frequently? Second, does reliance on government funding and greater institutionalization, both pervasive trends among HSNPs, affect the choices they make when it comes to the tactics they engage in? Findings indicate that HSNPs are involved in a wide range of advocacy tactics, but that together the field-level trends of institutionalization and privatization may be increasing political opportunity for HSNPs, leading to tactical choices similar to those of interest groups. Increased institutionalization and dependence on government funding are associated with using a wider variety of tactics overall and increased use of insider tactics in particular.
Alexander, J. ( 2000). Adaptive strategies of nonprofit human service organizations in an era of devolution and new public management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10, 287-303.
2.
Alter, C.F. ( 2000). Interorganizational collaboration in the task environment . In R. Patti (Ed.), The handbook of social welfare management (pp. 283-302). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Andrews, K.T., & Edwards, B. ( 2004). Advocacy organizations in the U.S. political process . Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 479-506.
4.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. ( 2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
5.
Bass, G.D., Arons, D.F., Guinane, K., & Carter, M.F. ( 2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy . Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute .
6.
Berry, J.M. (in press). Urban interest groups. In L. S. Maisel & J. M. Berry (Eds.), The handbook of American political parties and interest groups. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Berry, J.M., & Arons, D.F. ( 2003). A voice for nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
8.
Burstein, P. ( 1998). Interest organizations, political parties, and the study of democratic politics. In A. M. Costain & A. S. McFarland (Eds.), Social movements and American political institutions (pp. 39-56). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Chaves, M., Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2004). Does government funding suppress nonprofits’ political activity? American Sociological Review, 69, 292-316.
10.
Child, C.D., & Grønbjerg, K.A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 259-281.
11.
Donaldson, L.P. ( 2007). Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies: Organizational factors as correlates to advocacy behavior. Journal of Community Practice, 15, 139-158.
12.
Everett, K.D. ( 1992). Professionalization and protest: Changes in the social movement sector, 1961-1983. Social Forces, 70, 957-975.
13.
Frumkin, P., & Andre-Clark, A. (2000). When missions, markets, and politics collide: Values and strategy in the nonprofit human services . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 141-163.
14.
Gamson, W.A. ( 1975). The strategy of social protest. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
15.
Grogan, C.M., & Gusmano, M.K. ( 2009). Political strategies of safety-net providers in response to Medicaid managed care reforms. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 34, 5-35.
16.
Grønbjerg, K.A., & Smith, S.R. ( 1999). Nonprofit organizations and public policies in the delivery of human services. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 139-171). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17.
Hasenfeld, Y. ( 1992). The nature of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Hojnacki, M. ( 1997). Interest groups’ decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 61-87.
19.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. ( 2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
20.
Jenkins, J.C. ( 1987). Nonprofit organizations and policy advocacy. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 296-315). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Jenkins, J.C., & Eckert, C.M. ( 1986). Channeling Black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the Black movement. American Sociological Review, 51, 812-829.
22.
LeRoux, K. (in press). The effects of descriptive representation on nonprofits civic intermediary roles: A test of the "racial mismatch" hypothesis in the social services sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly .
23.
Lofland, J. ( 1996). Social movement organizations: Guide to research on insurgent realities. New York: Aldine De Gruyter .
24.
Long, J.S., & Freese, J. ( 2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
25.
Marwell, N. ( 2007). Bargaining forBrooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
26.
McAdam, D. ( 1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
McAdam, D., Sampson, R.J., Weffer, S., & MacIndoe, H. ( 2005). "There will be fighting in the streets": The distorting lens of social movement theory. Mobilization: An International Journal, 10(1), 1-18.
28.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. ( 1996). To map contentious politics. Mobilization: An International Journal, 1(1), 17-34.
29.
McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M.N. ( 1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
30.
Meyer, J.W., & Rowan, B. ( 1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
31.
Mosley, J.E. ( 2008). Nonprofit policy advocacy and lobbying in human service organizations. In R. Patti (Ed.), Handbook of human services management (pp. 457-472). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Mosley, J.E. ( 2009). Policy advocacy by human service nonprofits: Incentives, involvement and impact. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 505-531). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Mosley, J.E. (in press). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review.
34.
Mosley, J.E., Katz, H., Hasenfeld, Y., & Anheier, H.K. ( 2003). The challenge of meeting social needs in Los Angeles: Nonprofit human service organizations in a diverse community. Los Angeles: UCLA School of Public Policy and Social Research.
35.
Oliver, C. ( 1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179.
36.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York : Harper & Row.
37.
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., & Hardy, C. ( 2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 23-43.
38.
Piven, F.F., & Cloward, R.A. ( 1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books .
39.
Reid, E.J. ( 2006). Advocacy and the challenges it presents for nonprofits . In E. T. Boris & C. E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (2nd ed., pp. 343-371). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
40.
Royston, P. ( 2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227-241.
41.
Royston, P. ( 2005). Multiple imputation of missing values: Update of ICE . Stata Journal, 5, 527-536.
42.
Salamon, L.M. ( 1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43.
Salamon, L.M., Geller, S.L., & Lorentz, S.C. ( 2008). Nonprofit America: A force for democracy?Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
44.
Schlozman, K.L., & Tierney, J.T. ( 1986). Organized interests and American democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
45.
Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. ( 1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
Spalter-Roth, R., & Schreiber, R. ( 1995). Outsider issues and insider tactics: Strategic tensions in the women’s policy network in the 1980s. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement (pp. 195-127). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
47.
Staggenborg, S. ( 1988). The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review, 53, 585-605.
48.
Staggenborg, S. ( 1989). Organizational and environmental influences on the development of the pro-choice movement. Social Forces, 68, 204-240.
49.
Staggenborg, S. ( 1991). The pro-choice movement: Organization and activism in the abortion conflict. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
Suchman, M.C. ( 1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches . Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
51.
Takahashi, L.M., & Smutny, G. ( 2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 165-185.
52.
Wiener, S.J., Kirsch, A.D., & McCormack, M.T. (2002). Balancing the scales: Measuring the roles and contributions of nonprofit organizations and religious congregations . New York: Independent Sector.
