Listings of Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-registered and state-incorporated nonprofits for the same region may differ for a variety of reasons. Using Indiana as a case study, we first describe the distribution of nonprofits across these two listings. We then present findings from a small telephone survey of incorporated nonprofits that are not registered with the IRS for Indiana to explore whether they are excluded from the IRS-listing for statutory, technical, or compliance reasons. We consider several aspects of state incorporation status: date of incorporation and whether active status has been maintained or not. We conclude that researchers need to pay careful attention to the limitations of the IRS registration system when wishing to examine the dimensions of the nonprofit sector at local, state, or regional levels. Our finding, that some nonprofits fail to maintain active incorporation status, points to significant problems of nonprofit capacity.
Abzug, R., & Mezias, S. ( 1993). The Fragmented state and due process protections in organizations . Organization Science, 4, 433-453.
2.
Abzug, R., & Turnheim, J. ( 1998). Bandwagon or band-aid? A model of nonprofit incorporation by state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 300-322.
3.
De Vita, C.J., & Twombly, E.C. ( 2003). The precarious billion dollar sector: Nonprofit human services in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area. Retrieved, January 14, 2008, from http://www .urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410879
4.
Edelman, L. ( 1990). Legal environments and organizational governance: The expansion of due process in theAmerican workplace. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1401-1440
5.
Edelman, L. ( 1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structure: Organizational mediation of civil right law. American Journal of Sociology , 97, 1531-1576.
6.
Fremont-Smith, M. ( 2004). Governing nonprofit organizations: Federal and state law and regulation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
7.
Giving USA Foundation. (2008). Annual survey of state laws regulating charitable solicitation as of January 1, 2008. Author.
8.
Grønbjerg, K.A. ( 1989). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(1), 63-80.
9.
Grønbjerg, K.A. ( 1994). The NTEE: Human service and regional applications. Voluntas, 5, 301-328.
Grønbjerg, K.A., & Allen, L. ( 2004). The Indiana nonprofit sector: A profile. Bloomington, IN: School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Retrieved , January 14, 2008, from www.indiana .edu/~nonprof/results/npsurvey/insprofile.html
12.
Grønbjerg, K.A., & Clerkin, R. ( 2005). Examining the landscape of Indiana’s nonprofit sector: Does what you know depend on where you look? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 232-259.
13.
Grønbjerg, K.A., Lewis, A., & Campbell, P. ( 2007). Indiana nonprofit employment: 2007 Report. Bloomington, IN: School of Public and Environmental Affairs. Retrieved , January 14, 2008, from www.indiana.edu/~nonprof/results/innonprofitemploy.htm
14.
Grønbjerg, K.A., Liu, H., Pollak, T., & Elliott-Teaque, G. (2009). Burrowing into the grey matter of the nonprofit universe: Changing patterns of IRS registrations and state incorporations, 2001-2005. Retrieved, January 14, 2008 , from http://www.indiana.edu/~nonprof/results/database/burrowing.pdf
15.
Grønbjerg, K.A., & Paarlberg, L. ( 2002, December). Extent and nature of overlap between two nonprofit databases: IRS tax-exempt registrations and nonprofit incorporation in Indiana . Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 565-594.
16.
Haycock, N. ( 1992). The nonprofit sector in New York city. N.Y. The Nonprofit Coordinating Committee of New York.
17.
Hopkins, B. ( 2007). The law of tax-exempt organizations (9th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley .
18.
Independent Sector & Urban Institute. ( 2002). The new nonprofit almanac and desk reference: The essential facts and figures for managers, researchers, and volunteers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Jenkins, G. ( 2007). Incorporation choice, uniformity, and the reform of nonprofit state law. Georgia Law Review, 41, 1113-1179.
20.
Malamut, M. ( 2008a, Second Quarter). Summary of sources of state nonprofit corporation laws. National Parliamentarian, 69(2), 8-11.
21.
Malamut, M. ( 2008b, Third Quarter). Issues of concern to parliamentarians raised by the 1952 Model Nonprofit Corporation Act. National Parliamentarian, 69(3), 16-21.
22.
Malamut, M. ( 2008c, Fourth Quarter). Issues of concern to parliamentarians raised by the 1988 Revised Model Nonprofit Corporation Act. National Parliamentarian, 69(4), 22-29.
23.
National Center for Charitable Statistics ( 2008). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved, January 12, 2008, from http://www.nccs.urban.org/resources/faq.cfm
24.
National Taxpayer Advocate. (2008). 2007 Annual report to Congress, Volume One. Retrieved January 14, 2008 from http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/arc_2007_vol_1_cover_msps.pdf
25.
Rafter, K., & Silverman, C. ( 2006). Silicon valley’s changing nonprofit sector. Regional Nonprofit Sector Report Series. San Francisco: Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management.
26.
Salamon, L.M. ( 1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
27.
Smith, D.H. ( 1997). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing "flat earth" maps of the sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 114-131.
28.
Toepler, S. ( 2003). Grassroots associations versus larger nonprofits: New evidence from a community case study in arts and culture. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 236-251
29.
Wing, K., Pollak, T.H., & Blackwood, A. ( 2008). The nonprofit almanac 2008. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
