This article argues that the concept of private government contributes to an elegant framework for understanding the public and private nature of American civil society. Private government has two distinct elements comprised of the interests of businesses and nonprofit organizations that exercise power to interact with government to achieve their specific goals and objectives. This new, yet familiar, lens on which to consider the role of the nonprofit sector in the United States and the manner in which it interacts with government policy makers and business decision makers adds clarity to the muddle of terminology scholars have assembled to classify and characterize one of American society’s most distinguishing features. The article will be of interest to domestic and international scholars seeking yet another tool to compare nongovernmental organizations and the particular character of civil society in countries that do not have the same political traditions as the United States.
Anheier, H.K. ( 2001). The civil society diamond: A primer (Civicus occasional paper, No. 2). Washington, DC: Civicus.
2.
Baer, S., & Feiock, R. ( 2005). Private governments in urban areas: Political contracting and collective action. American Review of Public Administration , 35(1), 42-56.
3.
Berger, P.L., & Neuhaus, R.J. ( 1996). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. Washington, DC: AEI Press.
4.
Boris, E.T. ( 1999). The nonprofit sector in the 1990s. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 1-33). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
5.
Boris, E., & Steuerle, C. E. (Eds.). (1999). Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
6.
Cook, K. S. (Ed.). (2001). Trust in society (Vol. II in the Russell Sage Foundation Series on Trust) . New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
7.
Couto, R. ( 1999). Making democracy work better: Mediating structures, social capital and the democratic prospect. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
8.
Domhoff, G.W. ( 2001). Who rules America? Power and politics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Drucker, P.F. ( 1990). Managing the nonprofit organization: Principles and practices . New York: HarperCollins.
10.
Duvall, T. ( 2003). The new feudalism: Globalization, the market, and the great chain of consumption. New Political Science, 25(1), 81.
11.
Ehrenberg, J. ( 1999). Civil society: The critical history of an idea. New York: New York University Press.
12.
Gilchrist, T.A. ( 2008, August 1). American Heart Association leader to retire after 35 years. CEO Update, XVIII(455). Available from http://www.associationjobs.com/articles/
13.
Habermas, J. ( 2000). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Hammack, D.C. ( 1989). Community foundations: The delicate question of purpose . In R. Magat (Ed.), An agile servant (pp. 23-50). New York: The Foundation Center.
15.
Hardin, R. ( 2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
16.
Helsley, R.W., & Strange, W.C. ( 1998). Private government. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 281-304.
17.
Hills, R.M., Jr. ( 2003). The constitutional rights of private government. New York University Law Review, 78(1), 144.
18.
Karl, B. ( 1997). Philanthropy and the maintenance of democratic elites . Minerva, 35, 207-220.
19.
King, C.S., & Stivers, C. ( 1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era. San Francisco: Sage.
20.
Lakoff, S. A., & Rich, D. (Eds.). (1973). Private government: Introductory readings. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .
21.
Light, P.C. ( 2008). The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
22.
Long, N.E. ( 1958). The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 64, 251-261.
23.
McConnell, G. ( 1966). Private power and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
24.
McKenzie, E. ( 1994). Privatopia: Homeowner associations and the rise of residential private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Mendel, S. ( 2003). The ecology of games between public policy and private action: Nonprofit community organizations as bridging and mediating institutions . Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 13, 229-236.
26.
Merriam, C.E. ( 1944). Public and private government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Mezey, M.L. ( 1997). Review of Privatopia. Journal of Politics , 59, 1292.
28.
Milofsky, C. ( 1988). Structure and process in community self-help organizations . In C. Milofsky (Ed.), Community organizations: Studies in resource mobilization and exchange (pp. 183-216). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Mintzberg, H. ( 2003). The nonprofit sector does not exist. ARNOVA News, 32(1), 8.
30.
O’Connell, B. ( 1999). Civil society: The underpinnings of American democracy . Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
31.
O’Connell, B. ( 2000). Civil society: Definitions and descriptions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 471-478.
32.
Piotroski, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2008, January). Regulation and bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the flow of international listings. Retrieved May 8, 2009, from www.gsb.stanford.edu/cgbe/research/documents/PiotroskiSrinivasanJanuary2008.pdf
33.
Powell, W., & Clemens, E. S. (Eds.). (1998). Private action and the public good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Putnam, R. ( 1993). Making democracy work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Putnam, R. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36.
Salamon, L. ( 1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1-2), 29-49.
37.
Salamon, L. ( 2002). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
38.
Salamon, L., Anheier, H., List, R., Toepler, S., Sokolowski, S.W., & Associates. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society.
39.
Schattschneider, E.E. ( 1975). Semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace .
40.
Seligman, A. ( 1992). The idea of civil society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M.P. ( 1999). Civic engagement in American democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Smith, D.H., & Shen, C. ( 2002). The roots of civil society: A model of voluntary association prevalence applied to data of larger contemporary nations. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 43(2), 93-133.
44.
Smith, S.R., & Lipsky, M. ( 1993). Nonprofit for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
Van Til, J. ( 2000). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
46.
Weisbrod, B. ( 1991). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Young, D.R. ( 2000, March). Alternative models of government-nonprofit relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 149-172.
48.
Young, D.R. ( 2006). Synthesis. In D. R. Young (Eds.), Financing nonprofits: Putting theory into practice (pp. 337-372). Arlington, VA: National Center on Nonprofit Enterprise; Lanham, MD : Altamira Press.
