Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research suggests that 501(c)(3) organizations play an active role in governance, shaping both the formulation and implementation of policy through advocacy. Previous work has, however, produced relatively inconsistent findings concerning the causes of and constrains on the advocacy function. In an attempt to reconcile these inconsistencies, this study draws on a theoretical model of strategic decision making in organizations, which suggests that decisions such as advocacy are best conceived of as a two-stage process. This approach produces the expectation that nonprofit organizations considering advocacy first decide whether the potential policy benefits are sufficient to undertake any form of political activity and then choose among the set of political tactics available to them. These hypotheses are tested in an analysis of the advocacy activities of more than 500 nonprofit reproductive health service providers.

Keywords

advocacy lobbying reproductive health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck, B. ( 1970). The voluntary social welfare agency. Social Service Review, 44, 147-154.

Berry, W.D. , Ringquist, E.J. , Fording, R.C. , & Hanson, R.L. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American States, 1960 -93. American Journal of Political Science 42(1): 327-48.

Berry, J.M. ( 2003). A voice for nonprofits. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Boyne, G. , & Walker, R. ( 2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 231-252.

Cruz, V. ( 2001). Advocacy in nonprofit human service organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.

Dalton, R. ( 1994). The green rainbow: Environmental groups in Western Europe . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

DiMaggio, P.J. , & Anheier, H.K. 1990. "The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors ." Annual Review of Sociology 16: 137-159.

DiMaggio, P.J. , & Powell, W.W. ( 1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.

DiMaggio, P.J. , &. Powell, W.W. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

10.

Hart, S. 1992. "An integrative Framework for Strategy-Making Processes ." Academy of Management Review 17: 327-51.

11.

Hay, R. 1990. Strategic Management in Non-profit Organizations. New York: Quorum Books.

12.

Hopkins, B.R. ( 1992). Charity, advocacy, and the law. New York: John Wiley.

13.

Jasper, J. ( 1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

14.

Kramer, R.M. ( 1985). The future of the voluntary agency in a mixed economy . Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21, 377-391.

15.

Krehely, J. ( 2001). Assessing the current data on 501(c)(3) advocacy: What IRS Form 990 can tell us. In Reid, E. J. , & Montilla, M. D. , (eds.), Nonprofit advocacy and the policy process: Exploring Organizations and Advocacy, strategies and finances (pp. 37-50). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

16.

Manser, G. ( 1974). Further thoughts on purchase of services. Social Caseworker, 55, 421-474.

17.

McAdam, D. , McCarthy, J. , & Zald, M. ( 1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Nicholson-Crotty, J. ( 2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 5-21.

19.

Reid, E.J. ( 2006). Advocacy and the Challenges it Presents for Nonprofits . In Boris, E.T. , & Steuerle, C. E. , Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

20.

Ring, P.S. 1989. The Environment and Strategic Management. In Handbook of Strategic Management, J. Rabin , G. Miller , & W. Hildreth , eds., New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

21.

Rubin, M. 1988. "Sagas, Ventures, Quests, and Parlays: A Typology of Strategies in the Public Sector." In Strategic Planning , J. Bryson & R. Einsweiler , eds., Chicago: Planners Press, 84-105.

22.

Salamon, L.M. ( 1995a). Explaining nonprofit advocacy: An exploratory analysis . Paper presented at the Independent Sector Spring Research Forum, Alexandria, CA.

23.

Thompson, J. 1967. Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. NewYork: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

24.

Tilly, C. ( 1979). Repertoires of contention in America and Britain, 1750-1830 . In M. Zald & J. McCarthy (Eds.), The dynamics of social movements: Resource mobilization, social control, and tactics, 126-155. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

25.

Wolch, J. ( 1990). The shadow state: Government and the nonprofit sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.

The Stages and Strategies of Advocacy Among Nonprofit Reproductive Health Providers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References