The idea of increasing the role of faith-based organizations (FBOs) as social service providers has risen to prominence during George W. Bush's presidency. Although the knowledge base on FBO activity has expanded in recent years, a number of factors make it difficult to ascertain the actual value of the services provided by these groups. This Research Note is concerned with reviewing several important studies in the emerging research to establish a comprehensive estimate for the dollar value of the social services provided by FBOs. The analysis in this research note reveals the value of the FBO contribution to be greater than previously recognized.
Amato-von Hemert, K. (1998). Anti-poverty policy and practice: Ethnographic case study of churches in Appalachia, Kentucky and South-Central Los Angeles (Joint Research Center on Poverty Working Paper No. 2). Retrieved July 24, 2007, from http://www.jcpr.org/wpfiles/amato_vonhemert.pdf?CFID=11953043&CFTOKEN=61724175
2.
American Association of Fund Raising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy. (1996). Giving USA 1996. New York: Author.
3.
American Association of Fund Raising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy. (2004). Giving USA 2004. New York: Author.
4.
American Association of Fund Raising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy. (2006). Giving USA 2006. New York: American Association of Fund Raising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy.
5.
Ammerman, N. (2001a). Doing good in American communities: Congregations and service organizations working together. Hartford, CT : Hartford Institute for Religion Research. Retrieved March 9, 2003, from http://www.hirr.hartsem.edu/research/research_charitable_choice.html#research
6.
Ammerman, N. (2001b). Still gathering after all these years: Congregations in U.S. cities. In A. Walsh (Ed.), Can charitable choice work? Covering religion's impact on urban affairs and social services (pp. 6-22). Hartford, CT: Pew Program on Religion and the News Media and the Leonard E. Greenberg Center for the Study of Religion in Public Life. Retrieved June 27, 2007, from http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/csrpl/Charitable%20Choice%20book/contents.htm
7.
Anderson, S., Orr, J., & Silverman, C. (2001). Can we make welfare reform work? The California religious capacity study. Retrieved March 8, 2003, from http://www.calchurches.org/WelfareReport
8.
Association of Jewish Family and Children's Agencies. (n.d.). Fact sheet. Retrieved March 17, 2007, from http://aijfca.org/facts.html
9.
Black, A., Koopman, D., & Ryden, D. (2004). Of little faith: The politics of George W. Bush's faith-based initiatives. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10.
Catholic Charities. (2006). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://www.catholiccharitiesusa.org/about/faqs.cfm
11.
Chaves, M. (1999). Religious organizations and welfare reform: Who will take advantage of "charitable choice"?The Aspen Institute Non-profit Research Sector Working Papers Series. Retrieved December 5, 2003, from http://www.nonprofitresearch.org/usr_doc/19966.pdf
12.
Chaves, M. (2002). Religious congregations. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 275-298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: What they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660-683.
14.
Cnaan, R., & Boddie, S. (2001, December). Philadelphia census of congregations and their involvement social service delivery [Electronic version]. Social Service Review, 559-580.
15.
Cnaan, R., Wineburg, R., & Boddie, S. (1999). The newer deal. New York: Columbia University Press. Crew , R. (2003). Faith-based organizations and the delivery of social services in Florida: A case study. The roundtable on religion and social welfare policy. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute of Government.
16.
De Vita, C., Printz, T., & Twombly, E. (1999). Report to the human services faith-based task force: Findings from the survey of community services of faith-based organizations in New Jersey. Retrieved November 30, 2002, from http://www.urban.org/authors/devita.html
17.
Ebaugh, H., Staltzman-Chaftez, J., & Pipes, P. (2005a). Faith-based social service organizations and government funding: Data from a national survey. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2), 273-292.
18.
Ebaugh, H., Staltzman-Chaftez, J., & Pipes, P. (2005b). Funding good works: Funding sources of faith-based service coalitions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Service Quarterly , 34(4), 448-472.
19.
Farnsley, A. (1998). Thinking of congregations as community assets . Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://www.polis.iupui.edu/RUC/Newsletters/Research/v011n07.htm
20.
Flynn Research. (2002). Lutheran services in America: 2000-2001 annual survey findings, executive summary. Retrieved March 6, 2008, from http://www.flynnresearch.com/lsa2001.html
21.
Formicola, J., Segers, M., & Weber, P. (2003). Faith-based initiatives and the Bush administration: The good the bad and the ugly. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
22.
Goodwill Industries. (2005). Goodwill Industries annual report 2005. Rockville, MD: Author. Retrieved March 24, 2007, from http://www.goodwill.org/page/guest/about/howweoperate
23.
Grettenberger, S. (2001). Churches as a community resource and source of funding for human services [Nonprofit research fund working papers series] . Retrieved March 9, 2003, from http://www.nonprofitresearch.org/publications1526/publicationsshow.htm?doc_id=74406
24.
Guest, A.M., & Lee, B.A. (1987). Metropolitan residential environments and church organizational activities. Sociological Analysis, 47, 335-354.
25.
Habitat for Humanity. (2005). Habitat for Humanity, 2005 annual report. Retrieved March 24, 2007, from http://www.habitat.org/giving/report/2005/annual_report_2005.pdf
26.
Hodgkinson, V., & Weitzman, M. (1993). From belief to commitment: The community service activities of religious congregations. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
27.
Independent Sector. (2001). The new nonprofit almanac in brief: Facts and figures on the independent sector 2001. Washington, DC: Author.
28.
Katz, M. (2001). The price of citizenship: Redefining the American welfare state. New York: Metropolitan .
29.
Kearns, K., Park, C., & Yankoski, L. (2005). Comparing faith-based and secular community service corporations in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 206-229.
30.
McCarthy, J., & Castelli, J. (1997). Religion-sponsored social service providers: The not-so-independent sector [Working paper series]. Retrieved March 9, 2003, from http://www.nonprofitresearch.org/publications1526/publications
31.
McGrew, C., & Cnaan, R. (2006). Finding congregations: Developing conceptual clarity in the study of faith-based social services. Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work, 25(3/4), 19-37.
32.
Mock, A. (1992). Congregational religious styles and orientations to society: Exploring our linear assumptions. Review of Religious Research, 34, 20-33.
33.
Office of the President. (2005). The budget for fiscal year 2005 [Historical tables, budget of the United States government, fiscal year 2005]. Retrieved March 26, 2007, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/
34.
Orr, J., Mounts, C., & Spoto, P. (2001). Religion and welfare reform in Southern California: Is charitable choice succeeding?Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center for Religion and Civic Culture.
35.
Ragan, M., Montiel, L., &Wright, D. (2003). Scanning the policy environment for faith-based services in the United States: Results of a 50-state study. The roundtable on religion and social policy. Albany, NY: Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government.
36.
Ragan, M., & Wright, D. (2005). Scanning the policy environment for faith-based services in the United States: What has changed since 2002? Results of a 50-state study. The roundtable on religion and social policy. Albany, NY: Nelson Rockefeller Institute of Government.
37.
Seley, H., & Wolpert, J. (2003). Secular and faith-based human services: Complementarities or competition. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://religionandsocialpolicy.org/docs/2003_spring_research_conference
38.
Sherman, A. (2000). A survey of church-government anti-poverty partnerships . American Enterprise, 11(4), 32-33.
39.
Smith, S., & Sosin, M. (2001) The varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 651-670.
40.
Tenpas, K.D. (2002). Can an office change a country? The White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, a year in review [Report prepared for the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life]. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://pewforum.org/events/022002/tenpas.pdf
41.
Twombly, E. (2002). The religious versus secular human service organizations: Implications for public policy. Social Science Quarterly, 83(4), 947-961.
42.
U.S. Census Department. (2003). Statistical abstract of the United States, Table 425: State and local governments-Revenue and expenditures by function: 2003. Retrieved March 17, 2007, from www.census.gov/compendia/statab/state_local_govt_finances_employment
43.
Weiner, S. (1996). Balancing the scales: Measuring the contributions of nonprofit organizations and religious congregations. Washington, DC: Independent Sector. Retrieved November 30, 2002, from http://www.independentsector.org/media/measuresPR.html
44.
White House. (2001). Unlevel playing field: Barriers to participation by faith-based and community organizations in federal social service programs. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010816-3-report.pdf
45.
White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives. (2006). Grants to faith-based organizations fiscal year 2005: Based on a review of 130 competitive programs and 28 program areas at seven federal agencies. Retrieved May 24, 2006, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/final_report_2005.pdf
46.
Wineburg, B. (2007). Faith-based inefficiency: The folly of Bush's initiatives. Westport, CT: Praeger .
