Charity brands have been found to assist income generation by enhancing donor understanding of an organization and what it stands for. Despite an increasing interest in this topic, few studies have addressed the dimensions of such brands and sought to explore the link (if any) with donor behavior. The authors report the results of a large-scale postal survey of donors to nine national nonprofits and conclude that traits associated with benevolence, progression, and conservatism are incapable of distinguishing between the study's participating brands. Traits associated with emotional engagement, service, voice, and tradition are capable of serving as the basis for differentiation and are also linked to facets of individual giving behavior.
Aaker, J.L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 347-356.
2.
Adler, P., & Adler, P.A. (1987). Role conflict and identity salience: College athletics and the academic role. Social Science Journal, 24, 443-455.
3.
Aldrich, T. (2004). Do-it-yourself DRTV: A practical guide to making direct response television advertising work for charities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9, 135-144.
4.
Ashton, M.C., Goldberg, L.R., & Kibeom, L. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 707-723.
5.
Ashton, M.C., Perugini, M., de Vries, R.E., Boies, K., Kiboem, L., Szarota, P., et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 353-367.
6.
Austin, J.R., Siguaw, J.A., & Mattila, A.S. (2003). A re-examination of the generalizability of the Aaker brand personality measurement framework. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 11, 77-92.
7.
Azoulay, A., & Kapferer, J.N. (2003). Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Brand Management, 11, 143-155.
8.
Barnardo's ad leads ASA's top offenders in 2003. (2004, April 23). Campaign, p. 1.
9.
Basch, C.E. (1987). Focus group interview: An under-utilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education Quarterly, 14, 411-448.
10.
Bendapudi, N., Singh, S.N., & Bendapudi, V. (1996). Enhancing helping behavior: An integrative framework for promotion planning. Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 33-54.
11.
Bennett, R., & Barkensjo, A. (2005). Causes and consequences of donor perceptions of the quality of the relationship marketing activities of charitable organizations . Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing , 13, 122-139.
12.
Berger, I.E., & Gainer, B. (2002). Jewish identity, social capital and giving. Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 408-413.
13.
Bhattacharya, C.B., Hayagreeva, R., & Glynn, M.A. (1995). Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing , 59(4), 46-57.
14.
Braybrooke, D. (1965). Philosophical problems of the social science. New York: Macmillan.
15.
Burnett, J.J., & Wood, V.R. (1988). A proposed model of the donation decision process . Research in Consumer Behavior, 3, 1-47.
16.
Charities Aid Foundation. (2002). Dimensions of the voluntary sector. West Malling, UK: Author.
17.
Charity Commission. (2005). The register of charities. Retrieved March 5, 2007, from http://www.charity-commission.gov.uk/
18.
Chiagouris, L. (2006). Nonprofit brands come of age. Marketing Management, 14(5), 30-33.
19.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20.
Davis, M.H., Hull, J.G., Young, R.D., & Warren, G.G. (1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 126-133.
21.
De Chernatony, L., & Dall'olmo, R.F. (1998). Modelling the components of the brand. European Journal of Marketing, 32, 937-1090.
22.
De Chernatony, L., Drury, S., & Segal-Horn, S. (2004). Identifying and sustaining services brands' values. Journal of Marketing Communications , 10, 73-94.
23.
Dutton, J.M., & Harquail, C.V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
24.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers .
25.
Elischer, T. (2001, July). Organizational identity and brand issues . Paper presented at the Institute of Fundraising Annual Conference, Birmingham, UK.
Fournier, S. (1991). A meaning-based framework for the study of the consumer-object relations. In R. Holman & M. Soloman (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 18, pp. 736-742). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
28.
Giving USA Foundation. (2007). Giving USA. Indianapolis, IN: Author .
29.
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
30.
Goulding, C. (1999). Consumer research, interpretive paradigms and methodological ambiguities. European Journal of Marketing , 33, 859-874.
31.
Griffin, M., Babin, B.J., Attaway, J.A., & Darden, W.R. (1993). Hey you, can ya spare some change? The case of empathy and personal distress as reactions to charitable appeals. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 508-514.
32.
Grounds, J. (2005). Special issue on charity branding. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10, 65-67.
33.
Grounds, J., & Harkness, J. (1996). Developing a brand from within: Involving employees and volunteers when developing a new brand position. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 3, 179-184.
34.
Growman, L. (2000, March). Leveraging the brand. Paper presented at the Association of Fundraising Professionals Annual Conference , New Orleans, LA.
35.
Grubb, E., & Hupp, G. (1968). Perception of self, generalized stereotypes and brand selection. Journal of Marketing, 5, 58-63.
36.
Guy, B.S., & Patton, W.E. (1989). The marketing of altruistic causes: Understanding why people help. Journal of Services Marketing, 2, 5-16.
37.
Hankinson, P., & Rochester, C. (2005). The face and voice of volunteering: A suitable case for branding. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10, 93-105.
38.
Hofstee, W.K.B., & Berge, J.M.F. (2004). Personality in proportion: A bipolar proportional scale for personality assessments and its consequences for trait structure . Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 120-128.
39.
Jones, A., & Posnett, J. (1991). Charitable giving by UK households: Evidence from the Family Expenditure Survey. Applied Economics, 23, 343-351.
40.
Keller, K.L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.
41.
Kirk, R. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
42.
Kleine, R.E., Kleine, S.S., & Kernan, J.B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social-identity perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2, 209-235.
43.
Kottasz, R. (2004). How should charitable organizations motivate young professionals to give philanthropically? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9, 9-27.
44.
Levy, S.J. (1959). Symbols for sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117-124.
45.
Ligas, M. (2000). People, products and pursuits: Exploring the relationship between consumer goals and product meanings. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 983-1003.
46.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B.E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification . Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
47.
Malloy, D.C., & Agarwal, J. (2001). Ethical climate in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12, 39-55.
McCracken, G.D. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 310-321.
50.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
51.
Morgeson, F.P., & Hofmann, D.A. (1999). The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 249-266.
52.
Olejnik, S., & James, A. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
Pharoah, C., Wilding, K., Walker, C., & Wainwright, S. (2005). UK Giving 2004/5. London: National Council for Voluntary Organizations .
55.
Pidgeon, S. (2002, July). Developing donor lifetime value. Paper presented at the Institute of Fundraising Annual Conference , Birmingham, UK.
56.
Prince, R.A., & File, K.M. (1994). The seven faces of philanthropy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57.
Radley, A., & Kennedy, M. (1992). Reflections upon charitable giving: A comparison of individuals from business, "manual" and professional backgrounds. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 2, 113-129.
58.
Ritchie, R.J.B., Swami, S., & Weinberg, C. (1998). A brand new world. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 4, 26-42.
59.
Sargeant, A. (1999). Charity giving: Towards a model of donor behavior . Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 215-238.
60.
Sargeant, A., West, D.C., & Ford, J.B. (2001). The role of perceptions in predicting donor value . Journal of Marketing Management, 17, 407-428.
61.
Saxton, J. (2002). Polishing the diamond. London : The Future Foundation.
62.
Saxton, J. (2005). The jeweller's story. London : nfpSynergy.
63.
Schervish, P.G. (2000). The material horizons of philanthropy: New directions for money and motives. New Directions in Philanthropic Fundraising , 29, 17-31.
64.
Schervish, P.G., & Herman, A. (1988). Empowerment and beneficence: Strategies of living and giving among the wealthy. (Final report on the Study on Wealth and Philanthropy; submitted to the T. B. Murphy Foundation Charitable Trust)
65.
Schlegelmilch, B., & Tynan, C. (1989). The scope for market segmentation within the charity market: An empirical analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics , 10, 127-134.
66.
Sirgy, M.J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 287-299.
67.
Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
68.
Solley, S. (2003, December 18). Have Barnardo's shock ads alienated donors?Marketing, p. 1.
69.
Strauss, A.L. (1990). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Stride, H. (2006). An investigation into the values dimensions of branding: Implications for the charity sector. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11, 115-124.
71.
Stride, H., & Lee, S. (2007). No logo? No way. Branding in the non-profit sector . Journal of Marketing Management, 23, 107-122.
72.
Tapp, A. (1996). Charity brands: A qualitative study of current practice. Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing , 1, 327-336.
73.
Thompson, B. (2002). Statistical, practical and clinical: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64-71.
74.
Thompson, B., & Kieffer, K.M. (2000). Interpreting statistical significance test results: A proposed new "what if" method. Research in Schools, 7(2), 3-10.
75.
Venables, B.T., Rose, G.M., Bush, V.D., & Gilbert, F.W. (2005). The role of brand personality in charitable giving: An assessment and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 295-312.
76.
Webber, D. (2004). Understanding charity fundraising events. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9, 122-134.
77.
Wee, T., Ming, T.T., & Matthew, C.H. (2003). Leveraging on symbolic values and meanings in branding. Journal of Brand Management, 10, 208-218.
78.
Werther, W.B., & Berman, E.M. (2001). Third sector management: The art of managing nonprofit organizations. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
79.
Wispe, L. (1978). Altruism, sympathy and helping. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
80.
Zwick, R. (1997, March). Would the abolition of significance testing lead to better science?Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
