Using case examples from Kenosha, Wisconsin, and metropolitan Washington, D.C., this article examines the relationship between social capital and civic engagement. Clarifying the differences and connections between the two concepts through comparing emergency-services organizations in the two communities, the article identifies three kinds of organizations where civic engagement and social capital function differently: citywide civic-engagement organizations, community-based civic institutions, and social-capital organizations. Analysis of the three organization types reveals that social capital and civic engagement are not always intertwined and that civic engagement through contributing to a nonprofit organization can either involve most groups in a locality or represent civic activity of one group within the city for its own members or another specific group. Findings suggest that participation in social-service agencies through volunteering or donations does not necessarily lead to greater civic engagement.
Borchert, J.
(1980). Alley life in Washington: Family, community, religion and folklife in the city 1850-1970.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press
.
2.
Bourdieu, P.
(1986). The forms of capital. In
J. G. Richardson
(Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (R. Nice, trans., pp. 241-258).
New York: Greenwood
.
3.
Brint, S.
, &
Levy, C.
(1999). Professions and civic engagement: Trends in rhetoric and practice, 1875-1995. In
T. Skocpol
&
M. Fiorina
(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 163-210).
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
.
4.
DeFelippis, J.
(2001).
The myth of social capital in community development
. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4),
781-806
.
5.
de Tocqueville, A.
(1990). Democracy in America.
New York : Vintage
. (Original work published 1835)
6.
Edwards, B.
,
Foley, M.
, &
Diani, M.
(2001). Beyond de Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective.
Hanover, NH : Tufts University
,
University Press of New England
.
7.
Fernandez Kelly, P.
(1995). Social and cultural capital in the urban ghetto: Implications for the economic sociology of immigration. In
A. Portes
(Ed.), The economic sociology of immigration: Essays on networks, ethnicity and entrepreneurship (pp. 213-247).
New York: Russell Sage
.
8.
Foley, M.
, &
Edwards, B.
(1997).
Escape from politics? Social theory and the social capital debate
. American Behavioral Scientist, 40,
550-561
.
9.
Foley, M.
, &
Edwards, B.
(1999).
Is it time to disinvest in social capital?Journal of Public Policy, 19,
199-231
.
10.
Gamm, G.
, &
Putnam, R.
(1999).
Association building in America, 1840-1940
. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29(3),
511-557
.
11.
Goode, J.
, &
Schneider, J.A.
(1994). Reshaping ethnic and racial relations in Philadelphia: Immigrants in a divided city.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press
.
12.
Granovetter, M.
(1973).
The strength of weak ties
. American Journal of Sociology, 78,
1360-1380
.
13.
Hunter, A.
(1974). Symbolic communities: The persistence and change of Chicago's local communities.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press
.
14.
Lynd, R.
, &
Lynd, H.
(1929). Middletown: A study in American culture.
New York: Harcourt, Brace
.
15.
Myers, D.
(1999).
Demographic dynamism and metropolitan change: ComparingLos Angeles
,
New York
,
Chicago
and Washington, D.C. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4),
919-954
.
16.
Portes, A.
(1998).
Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology
. Annual Review of Sociology, 24,
1-24
.
17.
Portes, A.
, &
Landolt, P.
(1996).
The downside of social capital
. The American Prospect, 26,
18-21
.
18.
Putnam, R.
(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
19.
Putnam, R.
(2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community.
New York: Simon & Schuster
.
20.
Putnam, R.
, &
Feldstein, L.
(2003). Better together: Restoring the American community .
New York: Simon & Schuster
.
21.
Schneider, J.A.
(1995).
Fostering equality through service learning
. NSEE Quarterly, 20(4),
10-11
.
22.
Schneider, J.A.
(1997).
Welfare to network
. Demos Quarterly,12,
30-32
.
23.
Schneider, J.A.
(1999).
Trusting that of God in everyone: Three examples of Quaker-based social service in disadvantaged communities
. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3),
269-295
.
24.
Schneider, J.A.
(2001). Kenosha social capital study. Available from http://home.gwu.edu/~jschneid
25.
Schneider, J.A.
(2003, March).
Newcomers serving the city: Immigrant church and non-profit connections in Washington D.C. and Kenosha, WI
. Paper presented at the 33rd annual Urban Affairs Association Meetings , Cleveland, OH.
26.
Schneider, J.A.
(2004). The role of social capital in building healthy communities.
Baltimore: Annie E. Casey Foundation
.
27.
Schneider, J.A.
(2005). Social capital, community and economic development .
Dallas, TX: FCE
.
28.
Schneider, J.A.
(2006a). Small nonprofits and civil society: Civic engagement and social capital. In
R. A. Cnaan
&
C. Milofsky
(Eds.), Handbook of community movements and local organizations (pp. 74-88).
New York: Springer
.
29.
Schneider, J.A.
(2006b). Social capital and welfare reform: Government, non-profits, churches and community in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
New York
: Columbia
University Press
.
30.
Schneider, J.A.
, &
Foley, M.
(2003). Immigrant churches and immigrant social services: Nonprofit and congregation connections in Washington DC. In Independent sector spring research forum.
Washington, D.C. : Independent Sector
.
31.
Scholman, K.
,
Verba, S.
, &
Brady, H.
(1999). Civic participation and the equity problem. In
T. Skocpol
&
M. Fiorina
(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 427-460).
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
.
32.
Skocpol, T.
(1999a). Advocates without members: The recent transformation of civic life. In
T. Skocpol
&
M. Fiorina
(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 461-510).
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
.
33.
Skocpol, T.
(1999b). How Americans became civic. In
T. Skocpol
&
M. Fiorina
(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 27-80).
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
.
34.
Skocpol, T.
, &
Fiorina, M.
(1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In
T. Skocpol
&
M. Fiorina
(Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1-26).
Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
.
35.
Trattner, W.
(1994). From poor law to welfare state.
New York: Free Press
.
36.
Wacquant, L.
(1998).
Negative social capital: State breakdown and social destitution in America's urban core. Housing and theBuilt Environment, 13(1),
25-40
.
37.
Waldinger, R.
(1995).
The “other side” of embeddedness: A case-study of the interplay of economy and ethnicity
. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(3),
555-580
.
38.
World Bank.
(2001). World Development Report 2000/2001. Available at www.worldbank.org/poverty/wdrpoverty/report.
