Exploiting a unique data set created in 1999 on a sample of 228 public, nonprofit, and for-profit organizations operating in the social service sector, and on 2,066 workers, the article tests whether workers’ satisfaction and loyalty to the organization is influenced by workers’ motivations and by the incentive mixes offered by different organizational forms. As for satisfaction, intrinsic and relational attitudes toward work exert the greatest influence, whereas workers motivated by economic interests are less satisfied. As for loyalty to the organization, satisfaction with economic and process-related aspects of the job appear to have the greatest impact. The behavior of nonprofit organizations, which form the largest part of the sample, is consistent with these results. The specific strength of their incentive mix is represented by worker involvement and other process-related aspects of the job. By contrast, workers in public bodies are the least satisfied, higher monetary incentives notwithstanding.
Abzug, R., & Watson, M. R. (2005). Finding the ones you want, keeping the ones you find. In R. D. Herman & Associates (Eds.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management (2nd. ed., pp. 623-659). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Almond, S., & Kendall, J. (2000). Paid employment in the self-defined voluntary sector in the late 1990s: An initial description of patterns and trends (Civil Society Working Paper 7). London: London School of Economics.
3.
Bacchiega, A., & Borzaga, C. (2001). Social enterprise as a incentive structures. In C. Borzaga & J. Defourny (Eds.), The emergence of social enterprises (pp. 273-295). London: Routledge.
4.
Bacchiega, A., & Borzaga, C. (2003). The economics of the third sector: Toward a more comprehensive approach. In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 27-48). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
5.
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489-520.
6.
Ben-Ner, A., & Putterman, L. (1999). Values and institutions in economic analysis. In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.), Economics, values, and organization (pp. 3-72). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Benz, M. (2005). Not for the profit, but for the satisfaction? Evidence on worker well-being in non-profit firms. Kyklos, 58(2), 155-176.
8.
Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2003). Do workers enjoy procedural utility?Applied Economics Quarterly, 49(2), 149-172.
9.
Borzaga, C. (2003). L’analisi economica delle organizzazioni nonprofit: Teorie, limiti e possibili sviluppi. In C. Borzaga & M. Musella (Eds.), Produttività ed efficienza nelle organizzazioni non profit. Il ruolo dei lavoratori e delle relazioni di lavoro [Productivity and efficiency in non-profit organizations: The role of workers and work relations] (pp. 23-48). Trento, Italy: Edizioni 31.
10.
Borzaga, C., & Depedri, S. (2005). Interpersonal relations and job satisfaction: Some empirical results in social and community care services. In B. Gui & R. Sugden (Eds.), Economics and social interaction: Accounting for interpersonal relations (pp. 132-153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2004). Worker involvement in entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Toward a new assessment of workers’ perceived satisfaction and fairness (Discussion Paper no. 7). Trento, Italy: University of Trento, Department of Economics.
12.
Centro Studi CGM. (Ed.). (2004). Fourth report on social cooperation in Italy. Torino, Italy: Edizioni Fondazione Giovanni Agelli.
13.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
14.
Deci, E. L., & Gagné, M. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362.
15.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
16.
Erez, M., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1102-1121.
17.
Eurisko. (1998). International Social Survey Programme, work orientation II. Milan, Italy: Eurisko, Social and Marketing Research.
18.
European Commission, Eurostat. (1994-1996). European Community Household Panel. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
19.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2001). Theories of fairness and reciprocity. Evidence and economic applications (Working Paper Series ISSN 1424-0459, n. 20). Zurich, Switzerland: University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.
20.
Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money: An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
21.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn from happiness research?Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402-435.
22.
Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Not for-profit entrepreneurs. Journal of Public Economics, 81(July), 99-115.
23.
Gui, B. (2000). Beyond transactions: On the interpersonal dimension of economic reality. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 71(2), 139-168.
24.
Gui, B., & Sugden, R. (Eds.). (2005). Economics and social interaction: Accounting for interpersonal relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Italian National Agency for Statistics. (2001). Census on industry and services. Available at http://dwcis.istat.it/cis/index.htm
26.
Leete, L. (2000). Wage equity and employment motivation in nonprofit and for profit organizations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43, 423-446.
27.
Levine, D. I. (1991), Cohesiveness, productivity, and wage dispersion. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 15, 237-255.
28.
Light, P. (2002). The content of their character: The state of the nonprofit workforce. Nonprofit Quarterly, 9(3), 6-19.
29.
Mirvis, P. H. (1992). The quality of employment in the nonprofit sector: An update on employee attitudes in nonprofit versus business and government. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3(1), 23-41.
30.
Mirvis, P. H., & Hackett, E. (1983). Work and work force characteristics in the nonprofit sector. Monthly Labor Review, 106(4), 3-12.
31.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2001). The characteristics and quality of service sector jobs. In Employment outlook 2001. Paris: Author.
32.
Ortman, A., & Schlesinger, M. (2003). Trust, repute, and the role of nonprofit enterprise. In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 77-114). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
33.
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815-1831.
34.
Pagano, U. (1985). Work and welfare in economic theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
35.
Prendergast, C. (1999). The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 7-63.
36.
U. K. Institute for Social and Economic Research. (1991-1999). British Household Panel Survey (GHPS) for the United Kingdom. Colchester, UK: University of Essex.
37.
U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1994, 1996, 1998, 2000). The National Longitudinal Study Youth (NLSY) for the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
