This article describes a telephone survey (called “America Gives”) that asked 1,304 randomly selected adults about their philanthropic behavior (giving of time and treasure) after the events of September 11, 2001. The questions were part of a larger national study (n = 4,200) on giving and volunteering that was being conducted at the time of the September 11 attacks. This article provides a brief description of that study, the methodological considerations resulting from the immediate philanthropic response to the September 11 events, and steps that were taken to adapt the study to the changing national conditions. Next, the authors provide descriptive results from the survey, along with multivariate analyses of the determinants of giving and volunteering in this unique situation. Finally, the authors provide some caveats for researchers who may want to assess household giving and volunteering, and discuss implications for nonprofit managers and policy makers.
AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy. (2002). Giving USA 2002. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
2.
Andreoni, J., Gale, W. G., & Scholz, J. K. (1996). Charitable contributions of time and money (Working paper). Madison: Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin.
3.
Association of Fundraising Professionals. (2002). Study of the impact of the events of September 11 on charities. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
Bennett, R., & Kottasz, R. (2000). Emergency fund-raising for disaster relief. Disaster Prevention and Management, 9(5), 352-359.
5.
Bradley, R., Holden, S., & McClelland, R. (1999). A robust estimation of the effects of taxation on charitable contributions (Working paper). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
6.
Bram, J., Orr, J., & Rapaport, C. (2002, November). Measuring the effects of the September 11 attack on New York City. Federal Reserve Board of New York Economic Policy Review, pp. 5-20.
7.
Britton, N. R. (1991). Permanent disaster volunteers: Where do they fit?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(4), 395-414.
8.
Brown, E. (1999). Patterns and purposes of philanthropic giving. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 212-230). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Brown, E., & Lankford, H. (1992). Gifts of money and gifts of time: Estimating the effects of tax prices and available time. Journal of Public Economics, 47, 321-341.
10.
Cox, L. R. (2002). September 11 relief funds: A report at six months. New York Regional Association of Grantmakers. Retrieved from http://www.nyrag.org
11.
Donors Forum of Chicago. (2002). Six months later...: A survey of local nonprofits and foundations reporting on their fiscal health and outlook after September 11. Chicago: Author.
12.
Duncan, B. (1999). Modeling charitable contributions of time and money. Journal of Public Economics, 72, 213-242.
13.
Fischer, H. W. (1994). Response to disaster: Fact versus fiction and its perpetuation: The sociology of disaster. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
14.
Foundation Center. (2002). September 11: Perspectives from the field of philanthropy. New York: Author. Retrieved from http://fdncenter.org/research/911/book.html
15.
Hall, M., McKeown, L., & Roberts, K. (2001). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy and Statistics Canada.
16.
Independent Sector. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1999 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
Independent Sector. (2001a). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 2001 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
Independent Sector. (2001b). A survey of charitable giving after September 11th, 2001. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved January 18, 2002, from http://www.independentsector.org/sept11/survey.html
19.
Jalandoni, N., & Hume, K. (2001). America’s family volunteers. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
20.
Mesch, D., Rooney, P., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. (2002, November 14-16). The effects of race, gender and measurement on giving and volunteering: Indiana as a test case. Paper presented at the 31st annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Montreal, Canada.
21.
Nasser, H. E. (2001, December 19). Poll: Charities should offer support, not just cash. USA Today. Retrieved January 2, 2002, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/attack/2001/12/19/pollstory.htm
22.
O’Neill, M., & Roberts, W. L. (2000). Giving and volunteering in California. San Francisco: Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management, University of San Francisco.
23.
Raphael, B. (1986). When disaster strikes: How individuals and communities cope with catastrophe. New York: Basic Books.
24.
Renz, L. (2002a). Assessing the post-9/11 funding environment: Grantmakers’ perspectives. New York: Foundation Center.
25.
Renz, L. (2002b). Giving in the aftermath of 9/11: Foundations and corporations respond. New York: Foundation Center.
26.
Rooney, P. M. (2002). The effect of the stock market and the attack on America on charitable giving. Indianapolis: Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
27.
Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Schervish, P. G. (2001). A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 551-568.
28.
Schuster, M. A., Bradley, D. S., Jaycox, L. H., Collins, R. L., Marshall, G. N., Elliott, M. N., et al.. (2001). A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. New England Journal of Medicine, 345(20), 1507-1512.
29.
Seessel, T. (2002). The philanthropic response to 9/11: A report prepared for the Ford Foundation. Trenton, NJ: Thomas Edison State College.
30.
Smith, T., Rasinski, K. A., & Toce, M. (2001). America rebounds: A national study of public response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.
31.
Steinberg, K. S., Rooney, P. M., & Chin, W. (2002). Measurement of volunteering: A methodological study using Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(4), 484-501.
32.
Tierney, K. J. (2001). Strength of a city: A disaster research perspective on the World Trade Center attack. Retrieved April 18, 2002, from http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/tierney.htm
33.
Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers. (2002). The philanthropic response to September 11th: A six month report. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Wolensky, R. P. (1979). Toward a broader conceptualization of volunteerism in disasters. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 8(3-4), 33-42.
