This analysis looks at how foundations and community organizations jointly formulated antipoverty agendas within the context of a collaboration forged in Chicago between these two groups in the aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The study reveals that as foundations exhibited preferences for supporting antipoverty work that they saw as politically safe and uncontroversial, community organizations enticed foundations to expand the range of funding agendas that suited these preferences. This finding is of timely significance given that during the past 2 decades, policy-making responsibility has shifted from the public to the philanthropic sectors.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Brown, P., & Garg, S. (1997). Foundations and comprehensive community initiatives: The challenges of partnership. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children.
3.
Chicago Initiative. (1992a). The Chicago Initiative Long Range Planning Task Force report (Box: Marta White #1. Folder: Reports). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
4.
Chicago Initiative. (1992b, June 12). Letter (Box: Marta White, 1. Folder: Correspondence). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
5.
Chicago Initiative. (1992c, June 18). Letter (Box: Marta White, 1. Folder: Correspondence). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
6.
Chicago Initiative. (1992d). Report of Funders’ Affinity Group meeting (Box: 1993Files, #4.Folder: CI Steering Committee Meetings). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
7.
Chicago Initiative. (1993a). The Chicago Initiative: A community response (Box: Marta Whites Files #1. Folder: Correspondence). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
8.
Chicago Initiative. (1993b, May 5). Letter (Box: Marta White 1. Folder: Correspondence). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
9.
Chicago Initiative. (1993c, November 10). Letter (Box: 1993 Files, 8. Folder: Correspondence Sent). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
10.
Chicago Initiative. (1993d, April 23). Memo (Box: Funders’ Files 1. Folder: Attachments).Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
11.
Chicago Initiative. (1993e). Report of the Chicago Initiative Committee on the 1993 summer component (Box: Marta White 1. Folder: TCI Funded Projects ‘92). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
12.
Chicago Initiative. (1994a, June 23). The Chicago Initiative work plan: A discussion document (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Executive Committee Meetings). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
13.
Chicago Initiative. (1994b, January). Funding decisions approved by Distribution Committee (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Long Range). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
14.
Chicago Initiative. (1994c, September 1). Memo (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Youth Development Task Force). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
15.
Chicago Initiative. (1994d, February 7). Minutes from Executive Committee meeting, special open session (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Executive Committee Comments). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
16.
Chicago Initiative. (1994e, January 27). Minutes from Steering Committee meeting (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Steering Committee). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
17.
Chicago Initiative. (1994f, September 22). Minutes from Youth Development Task Force meeting (Box: 1993 Files, 7. Folder: Youth Development Task Force). Chicago: Chicago Historical Society.
18.
Colwell, M. (1993). Private foundations and public policy: The political role of philanthropy. New York: Garland.
19.
Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (1996). Mobilization at the margins: Resources, benefactors, and the viability of homeless social movement organizations. American Sociological Review, 61, 1089-1109.
20.
Fisher, D. (1983). The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony. Sociology, 17, 206-233.
21.
Haines, H. H. (1984). Black radicalization and the funding of civil rights: 1957-1970. Social Problems, 32, 31-43.
22.
Haines, H. H. (1988). Black radicals and the civil rights mainstream, 1954-1970. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
23.
Halpern, R. (1995). Rebuilding the inner city. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
Helfgot, J. (1981). Professional reforming. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25.
Jenkins, J. C. (1989). Social movement philanthropy and American democracy. In R. Magat (Ed.), Philanthropic giving: Studies in varieties and goals (pp. 292-314). New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Jenkins, J. C. (1998). Channeling social protest: Foundation patronage of contemporary social movements. In W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 206-216). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
27.
Jenkins, J. C., & Eckert, C. M. (1986). Channeling Black insurgency: Elite patronage and professional social movement organizations in the development of the Black movement. American Sociological Review, 51, 812-829.
28.
Jenkins, J. C., & Perrow, C. (1977). Insurgency of the powerless: Farm worker movements (1946-1972). American Sociological Review, 42, 249-268.
29.
Karl, B. D., & Katz, S. N. (1987). Foundations and ruling class elites. Daedalus, 116, 1-40.
30.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: HarperCollins College.
31.
Marger, M. (1984). Social movement organization and response to environmental change. Social Problems, 32, 16-30.
32.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of Black insurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
McCarthy, J., Shields, J. J., & Hall, M. F. (1997). The American Catholic bishops and the empowerment of the poor through community development. In J. H. Stanfield, II (Ed.), Research in social policy: Vol. 5. Social justice philanthropy (pp. 97-119). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
34.
McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1973). The trend of social movements: Professionalization and resource mobilization. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
35.
McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
36.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Milofsky, C. (1997). Community organizations and the new politics. In J.H. Stanfield, II (Ed.), Research in social policy: Vol. 5: Social justice philanthropy (pp. 139-168). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
38.
Morris, A. (1984). The origin of the civil rights movement. New York: Free Press.
39.
Nickerson, M. (1992, October 14). Sniper kills Cabrini kid steps from school. Chicago Tribune, p. 1.
40.
Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflicts and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Ostrander, S. A., & Schervish, P. G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. Van Til (Ed.), Issues in American philanthropy: Strengthening theory and practice (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Ostrander, S. A., Silver, I., & McCarthy, D. (in press). Mobilizing money strategically: Grantee agency, the funding dilemma, and social change philanthropy. In D. Faber & D. McCarthy (Eds.), Foundations for social change: Critical perspectives on philanthropy and popular movements. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
43.
Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
Paarlberg, L., & Gronbjerg, K. (1999, November). Funding human services: Can public and private funders cope with the changing environment? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Washington, DC.
45.
Pitt, J. (1996, November). Comprehensive community revitalization: Assessing the new generation of community development initiatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, New York City.
46.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements. New York: Pantheon.
47.
Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (1991). Agenda setting: Readings on media, public opinion, and policymaking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Raynor, G. K. (1999). The Ford Foundation’s war on poverty: Private philanthropy and race relations in New York City, 1948-68. In E. C. Lagemann (Ed.), Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities (pp. 195-228). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
49.
Rose, S. (1976). Betrayal of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
50.
Stanfield, J. H., II. (1997). Social justice philanthropy. In J. H. Stanfield, II (Ed.), Research in social policy: Vol. 5. Social justice philanthropy (pp. ix-xvi). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
51.
Walsh, J. (1997). Community building in theory and practice: Three case studies. National Civic Review, 86, 291-314.
52.
Wolpert, J. (1997). How federal cutbacks affect the charitable sector. In L. A. Staeheli, J. E. Kodras, & C. Flint (Eds.), State devolution in America (pp. 97-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Zweigenhaft, R. L., & Domhoff, G. W. (1997). Sophisticated conservatives and the integration of prep schools: The creation, funding, and evolution of the “A Better Chance” program. In J. H. Stanfield, II (Ed.), Research in social policy: Vol. 5. Social justice philanthropy (pp. 223-240). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
