Surveys of charitable giving typically find that a substantial proportion of respondents say they do not know how much they gave in the past year. In this article, it is argued that these responses tend to distort giving levels among certain demographic groups, thus compromising the accuracy of charity measures. This problem is illustrated using data from the 2000 Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, and the groups that are the primary source of this distortion are identified.
Andreoni, J., Brown, E., & Rischall, I. (2003). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter?Journal of Human Resources, 38(1), 111-133.
2.
Asheim, G. B. (1991). Unjust intergenerational allocations. Journal of Economic Theory, 54(2), 350-371.
3.
Barrett, C. B. (1999). On pluralistic ethics and the economics of compassion. Bulletin of the Association of Christian Economists, 33, 20-35.
4.
Berinsky, A. (1999). The two faces of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 1209-1230.
5.
Berinsky, A. (2002a).Political context andthe survey response: The dynamicsof racial policy opinion. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 567-584.
6.
Berinsky, A. (2002b). Silent voices: Social welfare policy opinions and political equality in America. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 276-287.
7.
Brooks, A. C. (2002a). Charitable giving in transition economies: Evidence from Russia. National Tax Journal, 55(4), 743-754.
8.
Brooks, A. C. (2002b). Welfare receipt and private charity. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22(3), 100-114.
9.
Brooks, A. C. (2004). Measuring item nonresponse bias. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
10.
Brown, E. (1997).Taxes andcharitable giving: Is there a new conventional wisdom. In 1996 proceedings of the 89th Annual Conference on Taxation (pp. 153-159). Washington, DC: National Tax Association.
11.
Clotfelter, C. T. (1985). Federal tax policy and charitable giving [National Bureau of Economic Research monographs]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Clotfelter, C. T. (1997). The economics of giving. In J. W. Barry & B. V. Manno (Eds.), Giving better, giving smarter: Renewing philanthropy in America (pp. 31-55). Washington, DC: National Commission on Philanthropy & Civic Renewal.
13.
Collier, D., & Mahoney, J. (1996). Insights and pitfalls: Selection bias in qualitative research. World Politics, 49(1), 56-91.
14.
Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (1999). General social surveys, 1972-1998: Cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
15.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161.
16.
Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1996). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
17.
Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1998). Responding to factual errors present in the Schervish and Havens articles, “Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving,” and other comments. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(4), 522-528.
18.
Hoge, D. R. (1995). Explanations for current levels of religious giving. In C. H. Hamilton & W. F. Ilchman (Eds.), Cultures of giving: How region and religion influence philanthropy. New directions for philanthropic fundraising (Vol. 7, pp. 51-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Independent Sector. (2001). The new nonprofit almanac IN BRIEF: Facts and figures on the Independent Sector. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from www.independentsector.org/PDFs/inbrief.pdf
20.
Jackson, E. F., Bachmeier, M. D., Wood, J. R., & Craft, E. A. (1995). Volunteering and charitable giving: Do religious and associational ties promote helping behavior?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 59-78.
21.
Litz, R., & Stewart, A. C. (2000). Charity begins at home: Family firms and patterns of community involvement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 131-148.
22.
Lustick, I. S. (1996). History, historiography, and political science: Multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 90(3), 605-618.
23.
McClelland, R., & Kokoski, M. F. (1994). Econometric issues in the analysis of charitable giving. Public Finance Quarterly, 22(4), 498-517.
24.
Morgan, J. N., Dye, R. F., & Hybels, J. H. (1977).Results from two national surveys of philanthropic activity. In Research papers sponsored by the Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs, Vol. 1 (pp. 157-323). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Treasury.
25.
Ostrower, F. (1995). Why the wealthy give: The culture of elite philanthropy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26.
Randolph, W. C. (1995).Dynamicincome, progressive taxes, andthe timing of charitable contributions. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 709-738.
27.
Reed, W. (2000). A unified statistical model of conflict onset and escalation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 84-93.
28.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 701-728.
29.
Saguaro Seminar. (2000). Social capital benchmark survey. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved December 1, 2002, from www.cfsv.org/communitysurvey/
30.
Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (2001). Wealth and the commonwealth: New findings on wherewithal and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 5-25.
31.
Steinberg, R. (1990). Taxes and giving: New findings. Voluntas, 1(2), 61-79.
32.
Wilhelm, M. (2003, November). The distribution of charitable giving in six surveys. Paper presented at the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action conference, Montreal, Canada.
33.
Wolfe, A. (1998). What is altruism? In W. W. Powell & E. S. Clemens (Eds.), Private action and the public good (pp. 36-46). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Wolpert, J. (1995).Giving and region: Generous and stingy communities. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 7, 11-30.
