The importance in Israeli society of service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is well known. Less well known are the voluntary alternatives to serving in the IDF through National Service. This study deals with the characteristics of National Service volunteers, their views and motives for service, their levels of satisfaction or dissatisfaction with their work, and proposals for changes in the National Service. The random sample included 40 volunteers. The instruments were developed specifically for this study. The findings suggest that parents and friends have the greatest influence on the decision to serve in the National Service. Altruistic motives are the main category of motivation for serving, followed by environmental pressure, and idealism. Overall, respondents were satisfied with their experiences, especially in regard to their coworkers’ attitudes. Although some dissatisfaction was expressed, it was not with the work itself but rather with the lack of public appreciation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carlopio, J., & Gardner, D. (1995). Perceptions of work and workplace: Mediators of the relationship between job level and employee reactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 321-326.
2.
Chapman, J. G., & Morley, R. (1999). Collegiate service-learning: Motives underlying volunteerism and satisfaction with volunteer service. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 18(1/2), 19-33.
3.
Chinman, M. J., & Wandersman, A. (1999). The benefits and costs of volunteering in community organizations: Review and practical implications. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(1), 46-64.
4.
Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1991). A functional analysis of altruism and prosocial behavior: The case of volunteerism. In M. Clark (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 119-148). London: Sage.
5.
Clary, G. E., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivation to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159.
6.
Clohesy, W. W. (2000). Altruism and the endurance of the good. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(3), 237-253.
7.
Cnaan, R. A., & Cascio, T. A. (1999). Performance and commitment: Issues in management of volunteers in human service organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 24(3/4), 1-37.
8.
Eisenberg, P. (2000). The nonprofit sector in a changing world. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(2), 325-330.
9.
Finlay, W., Martin, J. K., Roman, P. M., & Blum, T. C. (1995). Organizational structure and job satisfaction. Administration and Society, 27(3), 427-450.
10.
Gidron, B., & Lazar, A. (1998). Level of religiosity and patterns of giving and volunteering in Israel. Social Security, 51, 44-56.
11.
Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Brundney, J. L., Ascoli, U., Meijs, L. C. M. P., & Ranade, S. (2000). Public perception of “who is a volunteer”: An examination of the net-cost approach from a cross-cultural perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 45-65.
12.
Harrison, W. D. (1994). The inevitability of integrated methods. In E. Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 409-422). New York: Columbia University Press.
13.
Litz, A. R., & Stewart, C. A. (2000). Charity begins at home: Family firms and patterns of community involvement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 131-148.
14.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Parker, P., Dipboye, R. L., & Jackson, S. L. (1995). Perception of organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management, 21(5), 891-912.
16.
Rapoport, T., Penso, A., & Garb, Y. (1994). Contribution to the collective by religious-Zionist adolescent girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(3), 375-388.
17.
Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Fleissig, P. (1987). Understanding motivation to help: A study of social cognition. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 113(3), 323-340.
18.
Schneider, J. C. (1996). Philanthropic styles in the United States: Toward a theory of regional differences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(2), 190-210.
19.
Sherraden, M., & Eberly, D. (1990). Introduction. In S. D. M. Eberly (Ed.), The moral equivalent of war? A study on non-military service in nine nations (pp. 1-6). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
20.
Sherraden, M., & Gal, R. (1990). Israel: Non-military service amidst continuing conflict. In S. D. M. Eberly (Ed.), The moral equivalent of war? A study on non-military service in nine nations (pp. 67-85). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
21.
State Comptroller and Ombudsman. (1996). Annual report [Report No. 47]. Jerusalem: Official printed publications of the State of Israel.
22.
State Comptroller and Ombudsman. (2001). Annual report [Report No. 51b]. Jerusalem: Official printed publications of the State of Israel.
23.
Stevens, S. E. (1991). Toward satisfaction and retention of senior volunteers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 16(3/4), 33-41.
24.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Palmer.
