In this commentary about Sider and Unruh’s typology, four questions are raised: (a) When religion is visibly expressed, is it the expression of religion? (b) When organizations move within the continuum, do they move in multiple and even counterintuitive directions? (c) How do beneficiaries benefit? (d) How does the “faith factor” figure into macro programs? It is concluded that it is in both what the typology is designed to do and not designed to do that informs future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Fabricant, M., & Fisher, R. (2002). Agency based community building in low income neighborhoods: A praxis framework. Journal of Community Practice, 10(2), 1-22.
2.
Martin, L. L., & Kettner, P. M. (1996). Measuring the performance of human service programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Netting, F. E. (1984). Church-related agencies and social welfare. Social Service Review, 58(3), 404-420.
4.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
